About: R v Harbottle

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: R v Harbottle Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/c/9T7Lpt3XKn

R v Harbottle, [1993] 3 SCR 306 is a Canadian criminal law case decided by the Supreme Court of Canada on the standard of causation required in order for an accused to be convicted of first degree murder under section 231(5) (where the murder is subsequent to a predicate offence) of the Criminal Code. The Court held that the standard for this provision must be strict requiring a "substantial and integral cause". On the facts, the Court found that Harbottle's conduct in holding the victim's legs while she was strangled to death was sufficient to be a substantial and integral cause. This standard does not apply to all first degree murder, where the standard articulated in R v Nette applies.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	R. c. Harbottle (fr) R v Harbottle (en)
rdfs:comment	R v Harbottle, [1993] 3 SCR 306 is a Canadian criminal law case decided by the Supreme Court of Canada on the standard of causation required in order for an accused to be convicted of first degree murder under section 231(5) (where the murder is subsequent to a predicate offence) of the Criminal Code. The Court held that the standard for this provision must be strict requiring a "substantial and integral cause". On the facts, the Court found that Harbottle's conduct in holding the victim's legs while she was strangled to death was sufficient to be a substantial and integral cause. This standard does not apply to all first degree murder, where the standard articulated in R v Nette applies. (en) R. c. Harbottle est un arrêt de principe de la Cour suprême du Canada rendu en 1993 sur la norme de causalité en droit pénal canadien pour qu'un accusé soit déclaré coupable de meurtre au premier degré en vertu de l'article 231 (5) du Code criminel, lorsque le meurtre est consécutif à une infraction pénale sous-jacente. (fr)
dcterms:subject	1993 in Canadian case law Canadian criminal case law Murder in Canada Supreme Court of Canada cases
Wikipage page ID	8271655 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	815071998 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	1993 in Canadian case law Murder Criminal Code (Canada) Canadian criminal case law List of Supreme Court of Canada cases Murder in Canada R v Nette Supreme Court of Canada cases Supreme Court of Canada
sameAs	R v Harbottle R v Harbottle R v Harbottle R v Harbottle
Unanimous	Cory J (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Canada-law-stub dbt:SCCInfoBox dbt:Lexum-scc2
docket	23037 (xsd:integer)
citations	[1993] 3 SCR 306 (en)
has abstract	R. c. Harbottle est un arrêt de principe de la Cour suprême du Canada rendu en 1993 sur la norme de causalité en droit pénal canadien pour qu'un accusé soit déclaré coupable de meurtre au premier degré en vertu de l'article 231 (5) du Code criminel, lorsque le meurtre est consécutif à une infraction pénale sous-jacente. La Cour a jugé que la norme pour cette disposition doit être stricte et exige une « cause substantielle et intégrale ». D'après les faits, la Cour a conclu que la conduite de Harbottle en tenant les jambes de la victime alors qu'elle était étranglée à mort était suffisante pour être une cause substantielle et intégrale. Cette norme de causalité ne s'applique pas à tous les meurtres au premier degré, où il s'agit de la norme énoncée dans R. c. Nette qui s'applique. (fr) R v Harbottle, [1993] 3 SCR 306 is a Canadian criminal law case decided by the Supreme Court of Canada on the standard of causation required in order for an accused to be convicted of first degree murder under section 231(5) (where the murder is subsequent to a predicate offence) of the Criminal Code. The Court held that the standard for this provision must be strict requiring a "substantial and integral cause". On the facts, the Court found that Harbottle's conduct in holding the victim's legs while she was strangled to death was sufficient to be a substantial and integral cause. This standard does not apply to all first degree murder, where the standard articulated in R v Nette applies. (en)
case-name	R v Harbottle (en)
decided-date	1993-09-30 (xsd:date)
full-case-name	James Harbottle v Her Majesty The Queen (en)
heard-date	1993-05-25 (xsd:date)
ruling	Harbottle appeal dismissed (en)
SCC	1992 (xsd:integer)
gold:hypernym	Case
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:R_v_Harbottle?oldid=815071998&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	1427 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:R_v_Harbottle
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	1993 reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada R. v. Harbottle R v Nette
is Wikipage redirect of	R. v. Harbottle
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:R_v_Harbottle

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3332 as of Dec 5 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 59 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software