About: R v Savage

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: R v Savage Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:Building, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FR_v_Savage

R v Savage; R v Parmenter [1991] were conjoined final domestic appeals in English criminal law confirming that the mens rea (level and type of guilty intent) of malicious wounding or the heavily twinned statutory offence of inflicting grievous bodily harm will in all but very exceptional cases include that for the lesser offence of assault occasioning actual bodily harm. Both sections of the Offences against the Person Act 1861 (sections 20 versus section 47) only require damage to have resulted from a violent or otherwise malicious act of the defendant. An appellate court may use its statutory power under a 1968 Act to substitute a charge with an appropriate lesser charge.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity building
rdfs:label	R v Savage (en)
rdfs:comment	R v Savage; R v Parmenter [1991] were conjoined final domestic appeals in English criminal law confirming that the mens rea (level and type of guilty intent) of malicious wounding or the heavily twinned statutory offence of inflicting grievous bodily harm will in all but very exceptional cases include that for the lesser offence of assault occasioning actual bodily harm. Both sections of the Offences against the Person Act 1861 (sections 20 versus section 47) only require damage to have resulted from a violent or otherwise malicious act of the defendant. An appellate court may use its statutory power under a 1968 Act to substitute a charge with an appropriate lesser charge. (en)
name	R v Savage; R v Parmenter (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	English criminal case law House of Lords cases Assault 1991 in British law 1991 in case law
Wikipage page ID	38327248 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1105813177 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Precedent English criminal law Court of Appeal Mens rea Jury instructions English criminal case law House of Lords cases Assault 1991 in British law 1991 in case law Assault occasioning actual bodily harm Offences against the Person Act 1861 Robert Lowry, Baron Lowry Lord Brandon of Oakbrook R v Cunningham Judicial Committee of the House of Lords Lord Ackner Lord Jauncey of Tullichettle Lord Keith of Kinkel
sameAs	R v Savage R v Savage R v Savage
subsequent actions	none (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Italic_title dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Infobox_Court_Case
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Drikkeglas_med_brud-2.jpg?width=300
citations	[1991] UKHL 15, [1992] AC 699, [1992] 4 All ER 698, [1991] 94 Cr App Rep 193, [1991] 94 Cr App R 193, [1992] 1 AC 699 (en)
court	Judicial Committee of the House of Lords
full name	The Crown and Susan Savage; joined appeal in law of The Crown and Philip Mark Parmenter (en)
judges	Robert Lowry, Baron Lowry Lord Brandon of Oakbrook Lord Ackner Lord Jauncey of Tullichettle Lord Keith of Kinkel
keywords	Assault (en) (en) Assault occasioning actual bodily harm (en) accidental aggravation (en) grievous bodily harm (en) oblique intention (en)
has abstract	R v Savage; R v Parmenter [1991] were conjoined final domestic appeals in English criminal law confirming that the mens rea (level and type of guilty intent) of malicious wounding or the heavily twinned statutory offence of inflicting grievous bodily harm will in all but very exceptional cases include that for the lesser offence of assault occasioning actual bodily harm. Both sections of the Offences against the Person Act 1861 (sections 20 versus section 47) only require damage to have resulted from a violent or otherwise malicious act of the defendant. An appellate court may use its statutory power under a 1968 Act to substitute a charge with an appropriate lesser charge. The latter offence, equally a misdemeanour was held to apply to a precise fact pattern which included pouring one's large glass of drink over someone with the glass slipping and cutting a wrist; and to another which included three month's of rough-handling child cruelty. (en)
date decided	1991-11-07 (xsd:date)
opinions	Section 3 Criminal Appeals Act 1968 applied. (en) Lord Ackner, per curiam. On the proven facts of the case, found by the jury, and their having established the relevant malicious act, the severe misdemenour of wounding with its consequent starting point of sentencing scale was improper, the correct legal classification of the offence was the misdemenour of assault occasioning actual bodily harm with its lower starting point for sentencing: a verdict of guilty of assault occasioning actual bodily harm is a permissible alternative verdict on a count alleging unlawful wounding contrary to section 20 of the Offences Against the Persons Act 1861. (en)
prior actions	Conviction in Crown Court for battery with liquid and for malicious wounding under section 18. (en) Court of Appeal replaced latter conviction with assault occasioning actual bodily harm under section 47. (en)
gold:hypernym	House
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:R_v_Savage?oldid=1105813177&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	6639 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:R_v_Savage
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	English criminal law
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:R_v_Savage

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 60 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software