Reitman v. Mulkey, 387 U.S. 369 (1967), was a United States Supreme Court decision that set an important legal precedent that held that a state could not authorize invidious discrimination by private landlords without entangling itself in the ensuing discriminatory private decisions. Thus, the state constitutional amendment by referendum purporting to authorize landlord freedom was unconstitutional.
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:label
| - Reitman v. Mulkey (fr)
- Reitman v. Mulkey (en)
|
| rdfs:comment
| - Dans l'arrêt Reitman v. Mulkey (387 U.S. 369, 1967), la Cour suprême des États-Unis soutient qu'un amendement constitutionnel à la Constitution de Californie violait le XIVe amendement interdisant la discrimination raciale. Cet arrêt est considéré comme ayant établi le précédent selon lequel toute disposition constitutionnelle d'un État, même prise à l'issue d'un référendum d'initiative populaire, serait anti-constitutionnelle si elle violait le XIVe amendement. (fr)
- Reitman v. Mulkey, 387 U.S. 369 (1967), was a United States Supreme Court decision that set an important legal precedent that held that a state could not authorize invidious discrimination by private landlords without entangling itself in the ensuing discriminatory private decisions. Thus, the state constitutional amendment by referendum purporting to authorize landlord freedom was unconstitutional. (en)
|
| foaf:name
| - (en)
- Reitman v. Mulkey (en)
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| Wikipage page ID
| |
| Wikipage revision ID
| |
| Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
| Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
| sameAs
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| Dissent
| |
| JoinDissent
| - Black, Clark, Stewart (en)
|
| JoinMajority
| - Warren, Brennan, Fortas, Douglas (en)
|
| LawsApplied
| |
| oyez
| |
| ParallelCitations
| |
| Prior
| |
| USPage
| |
| USVol
| |
| ArgueYear
| |
| case
| |
| courtlistener
| |
| DecideDate
| |
| DecideYear
| |
| findlaw
| |
| fullname
| |
| Holding
| - California Proposition 14 violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (en)
|
| justia
| |
| Litigants
| |
| majority
| |
| loc
| |
| has abstract
| - Dans l'arrêt Reitman v. Mulkey (387 U.S. 369, 1967), la Cour suprême des États-Unis soutient qu'un amendement constitutionnel à la Constitution de Californie violait le XIVe amendement interdisant la discrimination raciale. Cet arrêt est considéré comme ayant établi le précédent selon lequel toute disposition constitutionnelle d'un État, même prise à l'issue d'un référendum d'initiative populaire, serait anti-constitutionnelle si elle violait le XIVe amendement. (fr)
- Reitman v. Mulkey, 387 U.S. 369 (1967), was a United States Supreme Court decision that set an important legal precedent that held that a state could not authorize invidious discrimination by private landlords without entangling itself in the ensuing discriminatory private decisions. Thus, the state constitutional amendment by referendum purporting to authorize landlord freedom was unconstitutional. (en)
|
| ArgueDateA
| |
| ArgueDateB
| |
| Concurrence
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)
![[cxml]](/fct/images/cxml_doc.png)
![[csv]](/fct/images/csv_doc.png)
![[text]](/fct/images/ntriples_doc.png)
![[turtle]](/fct/images/n3turtle_doc.png)
![[ld+json]](/fct/images/jsonld_doc.png)
![[rdf+json]](/fct/images/json_doc.png)
![[rdf+xml]](/fct/images/xml_doc.png)
![[atom+xml]](/fct/images/atom_doc.png)
![[html]](/fct/images/html_doc.png)