About: Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc.

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc. Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FRomag_Fasteners%2C_Inc._v._Fossil%2C_Inc.

Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc., 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case related to trademark law under the Lanham Act. In the 9–0 decision on judgement, the Court ruled that a plaintiff in a trademark infringement lawsuit is not required to demonstrate that the defendant willfully infringed on their trademark to claim lost profit damages.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc. (en)
rdfs:comment	Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc., 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case related to trademark law under the Lanham Act. In the 9–0 decision on judgement, the Court ruled that a plaintiff in a trademark infringement lawsuit is not required to demonstrate that the defendant willfully infringed on their trademark to claim lost profit damages. (en)
foaf:name	(en) Romag Fasteners, Inc., Petitioner v. Fossil Group, Inc., fka Fossil, Inc., et al. (en)
dcterms:subject	2020 in United States case law United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court United States trademark case law Fossil Group Counterfeit consumer goods Fasteners
Wikipage page ID	64034925 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1063283712 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Samuel Alito F. Supp. 3d 2020 in United States case law United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit United States District Court for the District of Connecticut Deterrence (penology) Trademark infringement United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court United States trademark case law Fossil Group Counterfeit consumer goods Macy's Stephen Breyer Trademark Fed. Cir. Fasteners Fossil Group Trademark dilution Unjust enrichment Janet Bond Arterton L. Ed. 2d Lanham Act Black Friday (shopping) Supreme Court of the United States Sonia Sotomayor D. Conn. Neil Gorsuch Certiorari Elana Kagan F.3d F. App'x
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/590/18-1233/ https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20160331133 https://www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20140703c08 https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-1233_5he6.pdf https://www.oyez.org/cases/2019/18-1233
sameAs	Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc. Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc.
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:USD dbt:UnitedStatesCode dbt:Ussc dbt:USArticleI
docket	18 (xsd:integer)
JoinMajority	unanimous (en)
LawsApplied	Lanham Act
oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2019/18-1233
ParallelCitations	172800.0 (second)
Prior	25920.0 (second)
USPage	___ (en)
USVol	590 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-01-14 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	2020 (xsd:integer)
case	Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc., (en)
DecideDate	0001-04-23 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	2020 (xsd:integer)
fullname	Romag Fasteners, Inc., Petitioner v. Fossil Group, Inc., fka Fossil, Inc., et al. (en)
Holding	A plaintiff in a trademark infringement suit is not required to show that a defendant willfully infringed the plaintiff’s trademark as a precondition to a profits award. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/590/18-1233/
Litigants	Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc. (en)
majority	Gorsuch (en)
other source	Supreme Court (en)
other url	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-1233_5he6.pdf
has abstract	Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc., 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case related to trademark law under the Lanham Act. In the 9–0 decision on judgement, the Court ruled that a plaintiff in a trademark infringement lawsuit is not required to demonstrate that the defendant willfully infringed on their trademark to claim lost profit damages. (en)
Concurrence	Sotomayor (en) Alito (en)
JoinConcurrence	Breyer, Kagan (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Romag_Fasteners,_Inc._v._Fossil,_Inc.?oldid=1063283712&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	9355 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Romag_Fasteners,_Inc._v._Fossil,_Inc.
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	List of United States Supreme Court trademark case law Romag Fasteners, Inc. v Fossil, Inc.
is Wikipage redirect of	Romag Fasteners, Inc. v Fossil, Inc.
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Romag_Fasteners,_Inc._v._Fossil,_Inc.

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 59 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software