About: Rule in Shelley's Case

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Rule in Shelley's Case Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:Rule105846054, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FRule_in_Shelley%27s_Case

The Rule in Shelley's Case is a rule of law that may apply to certain future interests in real property and trusts created in common law jurisdictions. It was applied as early as 1366 in The Provost of Beverly's Case but in its present form is derived from Shelley's Case (1581), in which counsel stated the rule as follows:

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing yago:WikicatCommonLawRules yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Cognition100023271 yago:Concept105835747 yago:Content105809192 yago:Idea105833840 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 country yago:Rule105846054
rdfs:label	쉘리사건의 원칙 (ko) Rule in Shelley's Case (en)
rdfs:comment	쉘리사건의 원칙(Rule in Shelley's Case)란 자유보유권의 이전이 있으며, 동시에 피이전자의 법정상속인에게 직접 또는 간접으로 단순 봉토권(fee simple) 또는 한사봉토권으로서 권리의 양도가 있는 경우, 그 후계자라는 말은 권리의 범위를 나타내는 한정문언(words of limitation)으로서 권리를 부여하는 양수인 지정문언(words of purchase)은 아니라는 법리이다. 1725년 이 원칙은 폐지되었다. (ko) The Rule in Shelley's Case is a rule of law that may apply to certain future interests in real property and trusts created in common law jurisdictions. It was applied as early as 1366 in The Provost of Beverly's Case but in its present form is derived from Shelley's Case (1581), in which counsel stated the rule as follows: (en)
dcterms:subject	Real property law Common law rules 1581 in England English property case law 1581 in law
Wikipage page ID	33657291 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1120584030 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Precedent En banc Merger doctrine (property law) Easter term Estate in land England Lord Chancellor Common law Fee simple Fee tail Real property law Common law rules 1581 in England Doctrine of worthier title Future interest Lawsuit Estate tax Edward Coke English common law John V. Orth Real property Remainder (law) Intestacy The Common Law (Holmes) English property case law 1581 in law King's Bench Law of Property Act 1925 Blackacre Occam's razor Words of purchase Rule against perpetuities Sir William Shelley Vested remainder States of the United States Trusts Future interests Life tenant Sion Monastery Sir Thomas Bromley
sameAs	Rule in Shelley's Case Rule in Shelley's Case Rule in Shelley's Case Rule in Shelley's Case Rule in Shelley's Case
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Property_law dbt:EB1911_poster dbt:Attribution_needed dbt:Authority_control dbt:Blockquote dbt:Efn dbt:Notelist dbt:Reflist dbt:Rp dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_dmy_dates
has abstract	The Rule in Shelley's Case is a rule of law that may apply to certain future interests in real property and trusts created in common law jurisdictions. It was applied as early as 1366 in The Provost of Beverly's Case but in its present form is derived from Shelley's Case (1581), in which counsel stated the rule as follows: …when the ancestor by any gift or conveyance takes an estate of freehold, and in the same gift or conveyance an estate is limited either mediately or immediately to his heirs in fee simple or in fee tail; that always in such cases, 'the heirs' are words of limitation of the estate, not words of purchase. The rule was reported by Lord Coke in England in the 17th century as well-settled law. In England, it was abolished by the Law of Property Act 1925. During the twentieth century, it was abolished in most common law jurisdictions, including the majority of the states of the United States. However, in states where the abrogation has been interpreted to apply only to conveyances made after abrogation, the relevance of the rule today varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and in many states remains unclear. (en) 쉘리사건의 원칙(Rule in Shelley's Case)란 자유보유권의 이전이 있으며, 동시에 피이전자의 법정상속인에게 직접 또는 간접으로 단순 봉토권(fee simple) 또는 한사봉토권으로서 권리의 양도가 있는 경우, 그 후계자라는 말은 권리의 범위를 나타내는 한정문언(words of limitation)으로서 권리를 부여하는 양수인 지정문언(words of purchase)은 아니라는 법리이다. 1725년 이 원칙은 폐지되었다. (ko)
gold:hypernym	Rule
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Rule_in_Shelley's_Case?oldid=1120584030&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	9911 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Rule_in_Shelley's_Case
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	List of early landmark court cases Charles Fearne Index of law articles Thomas Bromley Doctrine of worthier title Edward Coke Remainder (law) Edward Vaughan Williams William Dean (priest) Shelley Sir William Shelley Rule In Shelley's Case Rule in Shelley's case Rule in Shelly's Case The Rule in Shelley's Case Shelley's rule
is Wikipage redirect of	Rule In Shelley's Case

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 59 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software