About: Peer review     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:Election, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/c/8YCXtajqjx

Scholarly peer review or academic peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of having a draft version of a researcher's methods and findings reviewed (usually anonymously) by experts (or "peers") in the same field. Peer review is widely used for helping the academic publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief, the editorial board or the program committee) decide whether the work should be accepted, considered acceptable with revisions, or rejected for official publication in an academic journal, a monograph or in the proceedings of an academic conference.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • مراجعة الأقران العلمية (ar)
  • Wissenschaftliches Peer-Review (de)
  • Revisión académica por pares (es)
  • Penelaahan sejawat ilmiah (in)
  • Scholarly peer review (en)
rdfs:comment
  • مراجعة الأقران العلمية ( ويشار لها أحيانًا بالتحكيم) هي عملية نقد الأعمال العلمية لمؤلف ما وأبحاثه أو أفكاره، وذلك من قبل خبير نظير له يحمل مؤهلات معادلة لمؤهلاته أو أعلى. (ar)
  • La revisión académica por pares (también conocida como arbitraje) es el proceso de someter el trabajo académico, la investigación o las ideas de un autor al escrutinio de otros expertos en el mismo campo, antes de que se publique un artículo que describe este trabajo en una revista, actas de conferencias o como un libro. La revisión por pares ayuda al editor (es decir, al editor en jefe, al consejo editorial o al comité del programa) a decidir si el trabajo debe ser aceptado, considerado aceptable con revisiones o rechazado. (es)
  • Scholarly peer review or academic peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of having a draft version of a researcher's methods and findings reviewed (usually anonymously) by experts (or "peers") in the same field. Peer review is widely used for helping the academic publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief, the editorial board or the program committee) decide whether the work should be accepted, considered acceptable with revisions, or rejected for official publication in an academic journal, a monograph or in the proceedings of an academic conference. (en)
  • Penelaahan sejawat ilmiah (juga dikenal sebagai ulasan sejawat ilmiah atau perwasitan) adalah proses penilaian karya ilmiah, penelitian, atau ide-ide seorang penulis di bawah pengawasan orang lain yang ahli di bidang yang sama, sebelum makalah yang menjelaskan karya ini diterbitkan dalam jurnal, prosiding konferensi atau sebagai sebuah buku. Penelaahan sejawat membantu penerbit (yaitu, kepala redaksi, dewan editorial atau komite program) memutuskan apakah sebuah karya harus diterima, dianggap dapat diterima dengan revisi, atau ditolak. (in)
dct:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3331 as of Sep 2 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 54 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software