About: Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc. Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:Test100791078, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FSony_Corp._of_America_v._Universal_City_Studios%2C_Inc.

Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984), also known as the “Betamax case”, is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States which ruled that the making of individual copies of complete television shows for purposes of time shifting does not constitute copyright infringement, but is fair use. The Court also ruled that the manufacturers of home video recording devices, such as Betamax or other VCRs (referred to as VTRs in the case), cannot be liable for contributory infringement. The case was a boon to the home video market, as it created a legal safe haven for the technology.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatTrialsWithCorporateDefendants yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Act100030358 yago:Activity100407535 yago:Attempt100786195 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case yago:Test100791078
rdfs:label	Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc. (es) Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc. (en) 索尼美国公司诉环球城市影业公司案 (zh)
rdfs:comment	索尼美国公司诉环球城市影业公司案，464 U.S. 417 (1984), 又俗称“Betamax案”, 是一起最终由美国最高法院判决的版权案件。该判决认定，个人出于时光平移（time shifting）目的而对电视节目进行的完整复制不属于版权侵权，而构成合理使用。法院同时认定，包括Betamax或其他类型录影机在内，家用录影设备的制造者无须承担共同侵权责任。本案判决为家用录影机创建了避风港，对其市场发展产生了巨大的激励作用。 (zh) Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc. , 464 US 417 (1984), también conocido como el " caso Betamax ", es una decisión de la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos que dictaminó que la realización de copias individuales de programas de televisión completos con el fin de time shifting no constituye una infracción a los derechos de autor y es de "uso legítimo" (fair use). El Tribunal también dictaminó que los fabricantes de dispositivos de grabación de videos domésticos, como Betamax u otros VCR (a los que se hace referencia como VTR en el caso), no pueden ser responsables de la infracción. El caso fue beneficioso para el mercado de videos domésticos, ya que creó un antecedente legal seguro para la tecnología. (es) Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984), also known as the “Betamax case”, is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States which ruled that the making of individual copies of complete television shows for purposes of time shifting does not constitute copyright infringement, but is fair use. The Court also ruled that the manufacturers of home video recording devices, such as Betamax or other VCRs (referred to as VTRs in the case), cannot be liable for contributory infringement. The case was a boon to the home video market, as it created a legal safe haven for the technology. (en)
foaf:name	Sony Corporation of America et al. v. Universal City Studios, Inc., et al. (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	Fair use case law 1984 in United States case law United States Supreme Court cases Disney litigation Universal Pictures litigation United States copyright case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court Sony litigation Media case law
Wikipage page ID	18935619 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1114070983 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Fair use case law Betamax 1984 in United States case law United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit United States District Court for the Central District of California Videocassette recorder Internet United States Supreme Court cases Columbia Pictures Copyright Act of 1976 Fred Rogers Disney litigation Bloomberg BNA Contributory copyright infringement Copyright Copyright infringement Damages MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. Universal Pictures litigation Compulsory license Federal Reporter Peer-to-peer A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. Thurgood Marshall U.S. Congress Walt Disney Company Universal Pictures United States copyright case law Fair use Federal Supplement First Amendment to the United States Constitution Harry Blackmun Associated Press United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court Justice Powell L. Ed. 2d Lanham Act Sony litigation Supreme Court of the United States Television Time shifting Digital Millennium Copyright Act Media case law Sony File sharing Certiorari Pamela Samuelson Stanford University Press United States Code Video tape recorder Unfair competition Injunctive relief Space shifting Video rental store Justice Rehnquist Movie channels Time-shifting U.S.P.Q. U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. LEXIS
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=5876335373788447272 https://www.law.cornell.edu/copyright/cases/464_US_417.htm

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 59 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software