Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. ICC, 219 U.S. 498 (1911), was a United States Supreme Court decision that held that while normally, in order for the court to hear a case, there must still be a controversy outstanding, when the issue was such that it would be of short duration, and would most likely become moot before appellate review could take place, and that the issue was likely to reoccur, then the court could hear the issue.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. ICC (en)
|
rdfs:comment
| - Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. ICC, 219 U.S. 498 (1911), was a United States Supreme Court decision that held that while normally, in order for the court to hear a case, there must still be a controversy outstanding, when the issue was such that it would be of short duration, and would most likely become moot before appellate review could take place, and that the issue was likely to reoccur, then the court could hear the issue. (en)
|
foaf:name
| - (en)
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v.Interstate Commerce Commission (en)
|
dcterms:subject
| |
Wikipage page ID
| |
Wikipage revision ID
| |
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
| |
sameAs
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
JoinMajority
| |
LawsApplied
| |
ParallelCitations
| |
Prior
| - Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Texas (en)
|
USPage
| |
USVol
| |
ArgueDate
| |
ArgueYear
| |
case
| - Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. ICC, (en)
|
courtlistener
| |
DecideDate
| |
DecideYear
| |
findlaw
| |
fullname
| - Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission (en)
|
justia
| |
Litigants
| - Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. ICC (en)
|
majority
| |
loc
| |
has abstract
| - Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. ICC, 219 U.S. 498 (1911), was a United States Supreme Court decision that held that while normally, in order for the court to hear a case, there must still be a controversy outstanding, when the issue was such that it would be of short duration, and would most likely become moot before appellate review could take place, and that the issue was likely to reoccur, then the court could hear the issue. (en)
|
googlescholar
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
is Wikipage redirect
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |