About: Subject-matter jurisdiction

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Subject-matter jurisdiction Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:Organisation, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com/c/8jy8Yh4KAm

Subject-matter jurisdiction (also called jurisdiction ratione materiae) is the authority of a court to hear cases of a particular type or cases relating to a specific subject matter. For instance, bankruptcy court only has the authority to hear bankruptcy cases. Subject-matter jurisdiction, personal or territorial jurisdiction, and adequate notice are the three most fundamental constitutional requirements for a valid judgment.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	organisation
rdfs:label	사물관할 (ko) Subject-matter jurisdiction (en)
rdfs:comment	사물관할(subject-matter jurisdiction, 혹은 대물관할)은 영미법의 개념으로 법원이 특정 법정분쟁중인 사물에 대해 관할권을 가지고 있는지 여부를 말한다. 대인관할(personal jurisdiction)과 대응되는 개념으로서 사물관할권이 없는 법원에서의 판결은 법적효력이 없다. 사물관할, 대인관할, 적절한 공시(adaquate notice)는 유효한 판결에 필요한 3가지 요소이다. (ko) Subject-matter jurisdiction (also called jurisdiction ratione materiae) is the authority of a court to hear cases of a particular type or cases relating to a specific subject matter. For instance, bankruptcy court only has the authority to hear bankruptcy cases. Subject-matter jurisdiction, personal or territorial jurisdiction, and adequate notice are the three most fundamental constitutional requirements for a valid judgment. (en)
foaf:depiction
dct:subject	American legal terminology Civil procedure Jurisdiction
Wikipage page ID	1460494 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1119499478 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	United States Congress Limited jurisdiction Criminal law General jurisdiction Notice Civil law (common law) Copyright Ordinary court United States bankruptcy court Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Patent Personal jurisdiction U.S. state Federal question jurisdiction Bankruptcy Amount-in-controversy Family court United States federal courts Removal jurisdiction Court Article III of the United States Constitution American legal terminology Civil procedure Jurisdiction Diversity jurisdiction Superior court Exclusive jurisdiction Probate Sua sponte Territorial jurisdiction Specialized court Bankruptcy court U.S. Constitution
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule12.htm
sameAs	Subject-matter jurisdiction Subject-matter jurisdiction Subject-matter jurisdiction Subject-matter jurisdiction Subject-matter jurisdiction
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Globalize dbt:Multiple_issues dbt:Refimprove dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:UnitedStatesCode dbt:Use_American_English dbt:Use_mdy_dates dbt:Expert dbt:US_fed_civ_pro
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/United_States_Bankruptcy_Court_Seal.png?width=300
has abstract	Subject-matter jurisdiction (also called jurisdiction ratione materiae) is the authority of a court to hear cases of a particular type or cases relating to a specific subject matter. For instance, bankruptcy court only has the authority to hear bankruptcy cases. Subject-matter jurisdiction must be distinguished from personal jurisdiction, which is the power of a court to render a judgment against a particular defendant, and territorial jurisdiction, which is the power of the court to render a judgment concerning events that have occurred within a well-defined territory. Unlike personal or territorial jurisdiction, lack of subject-matter jurisdiction cannot be waived. A judgment from a court that did not have subject-matter jurisdiction is forever a nullity. To decide a case, a court must have a combination of subject (subjectam) and either personal (personam) or territorial (locum) jurisdiction. Subject-matter jurisdiction, personal or territorial jurisdiction, and adequate notice are the three most fundamental constitutional requirements for a valid judgment. (en) 사물관할(subject-matter jurisdiction, 혹은 대물관할)은 영미법의 개념으로 법원이 특정 법정분쟁중인 사물에 대해 관할권을 가지고 있는지 여부를 말한다. 대인관할(personal jurisdiction)과 대응되는 개념으로서 사물관할권이 없는 법원에서의 판결은 법적효력이 없다. 사물관할, 대인관할, 적절한 공시(adaquate notice)는 유효한 판결에 필요한 3가지 요소이다. (ko)
gold:hypernym	Authority
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Subject-matter_jurisdiction?oldid=1119499478&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	6601 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Subject-matter_jurisdiction
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	Powell v. McCormack Professional corporation Rockwell International Corp. v. United States Same-sex marriage in Texas Saudi Arabia v. Nelson Scottish Land Court 2012 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Roberts Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents Day v. McDonough List of Lord High Admirals of Scotland United States Court of International Trade United States v. Ivanov List of justices of the Federal Constitutional Court List of landmark court decisions in the United States List of legal abbreviations Timeline of same-sex marriage in the United States Court of Exchequer (Scotland) Court of Session Courts of Scotland General jurisdiction Midnight Judges Act Ohio Municipal Courts Circuit court Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 Fufi Santori Google Spain v AEPD and Mario Costeja González Constitutional challenges to the Affordable Care Act Copyright law of the United States Copyright registration Thomas Beatie Ordinary court United States bankruptcy court

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3331 as of Sep 2 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 51 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software