• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: The Book of Genesis (comics)     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:Wikicat2009GraphicNovels, within Data Space : dbpedia.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)

Type: yago:WikicatAmericanGraphicNovelsyago:WikicatNon-fictionGraphicNovelsyago:Abstraction100002137yago:Act100030358yago:Action100037396yago:Beginning100235435yago:Change100191142yago:ChangeOfState100199130yago:Communication100033020yago:Event100029378yago:Fiction106367107yago:Introduction100238022yago:LiteraryComposition106364329yago:Novel106367879yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100yago:Writing106362953yago:WrittenCommunication106349220yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntitybookyago:Wikicat2009ComicDebutsyago:Wikicat2009GraphicNovels New Facet based on Instances of this Class

The Book of Genesis (2009) is a comic book illustrated by American cartoonist Robert Crumb that purports to be a faithful, literal illustration of the Book of Genesis. It reached #1 the New York Times graphic novel bestseller list and on the Christian books list at Amazon.com. The book has been controversial, particularly for the explicit illustrations of sexual intercourse described in the text itself. In critical circles, it has drawn fire over whether and how literal the illustration job is, or should be.