This HTML5 document contains 72 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n14https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n9http://electionlawblog.org/wp-content/uploads/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:American_Tradition_Partnership,_Inc._v._Bullock
rdf:type
owl:Thing dbo:LegalCase dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase dbo:Case dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719
rdfs:label
American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock
rdfs:comment
American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock, 2011 MT 328, is a decision by the Montana Supreme Court ruling that the broad free speech protections given to corporations in Citizens United v. FEC do not apply to Montana's campaign finance laws. The United States Supreme Court reversed the Montana Supreme Court's decision in American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock, 567, U.S. 516 (2012), in a short, per curiam opinion issued without oral argument. The court wrote only that the legal issue had already been precluded by Citizens United, and this case offered no new arguments and failed to distinguish that prior decision.
foaf:name
American Tradition Partnership, Inc., fka Western Tradition Partnership, Inc., et al. v. Steve Bullock, Attorney General of Montana, et al.
dcterms:subject
dbc:Political_history_of_Montana dbc:United_States_elections_case_law dbc:Montana_state_case_law dbc:2011_in_Montana dbc:2011_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court
dbo:wikiPageID
34318554
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1100035528
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Per_curiam dbr:Steve_Bullock_(American_politician) dbr:Elena_Kagan dbr:James_Bopp dbc:Montana_state_case_law dbr:Montana dbc:2011_in_Montana dbc:2011_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Political_history_of_Montana dbr:Quid_pro_quo dbc:United_States_elections_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Oral_argument dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Sonia_Sotomayor dbr:Paul_Magnuson dbr:Stay_of_proceedings dbr:Stephen_Breyer dbr:McCain-Feingold_Act dbr:Original_intent dbr:American_Tradition_Partnership dbr:Bipartisan_Campaign_Reform_Act dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Citizens_United_v._FEC dbr:Citizens_United_v._Federal_Election_Commission dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbr:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg dbr:Montana_Supreme_Court
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n9:MT-expenditures-decision.pdf
owl:sameAs
n14:4xwAL wikidata:Q7988389
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Reflist dbt:Italic_title dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:US1stAmendment
dbp:dissent
Breyer
dbp:joindissent
Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan
dbp:lawsapplied
dbr:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Attorney General, 2011 MT 328
dbp:uspage
516
dbp:usvol
567
dbp:decidedate
0001-06-25
dbp:decideyear
2012
dbp:fullname
American Tradition Partnership, Inc., fka Western Tradition Partnership, Inc., et al. v. Steve Bullock, Attorney General of Montana, et al.
dbp:litigants
American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock
dbo:abstract
American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock, 2011 MT 328, is a decision by the Montana Supreme Court ruling that the broad free speech protections given to corporations in Citizens United v. FEC do not apply to Montana's campaign finance laws. The United States Supreme Court reversed the Montana Supreme Court's decision in American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock, 567, U.S. 516 (2012), in a short, per curiam opinion issued without oral argument. The court wrote only that the legal issue had already been precluded by Citizens United, and this case offered no new arguments and failed to distinguish that prior decision.
dbp:percuriam
Yes
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:American_Tradition_Partnership,_Inc._v._Bullock?oldid=1100035528&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
14486
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:American_Tradition_Partnership,_Inc._v._Bullock