This HTML5 document contains 207 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n6http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:
n15https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n10http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Antitheatricality
rdf:type
owl:Thing
rdfs:label
Antitheatricality
rdfs:comment
Antitheatricality is any form of opposition or hostility to theater. Such opposition is as old as theater itself, suggesting a deep-seated ambivalence in human nature about the dramatic arts. Jonas Barish's 1981 book, The Antitheatrical Prejudice, was, according to one of his Berkeley colleagues, immediately recognized as having given intellectual and historical definition to a phenomenon which up to that point had been only dimly observed and understood. The book earned the American Theater Association's Barnard Hewitt Award for outstanding research in theater history. Barish and some more recent commentators treat the anti-theatrical, not as an enemy to be overcome, but rather as an inevitable and valuable part of the theatrical dynamic.
rdfs:seeAlso
dbr:Mimesis dbr:William_Morton_(theatre_manager) dbr:Stewart_Headlam dbr:Stage' dbr:Mansfield_Park dbr:Restoration_comedy dbr:English_Renaissance_theatre
foaf:depiction
n10:Wenceslas_Hollar_-_Prynne_cropped.jpg n10:Wilberforce_john_rising.jpg n10:ShortView1698.png n10:Ben_Jonson_by_George_Vertue_1730_(cropped).jpg n10:Stewart_Headlam.jpg n10:William_Morton,_theatre_manager.jpg n10:Portrait_of_Plato;_bust._Wellcome_M0005618.jpg n10:Tertullian's_Prescription_Against_Hereticks.jpg n10:Charles_Lamb.jpg n10:Mp-Brock-03.jpg n10:ChesterMysteryPlay_300dpi.jpg n10:Jean-Jacques_Rousseau_(painted_portrait).jpg n10:Thomas_Becon.jpg n10:London._Royalty_Theatre._Advertising_postcard._1912.jpg n10:Aphra_Behn.jpg
dcterms:subject
dbc:History_of_theatre dbc:Theatre_criticism dbc:British_drama dbc:Theatre_in_the_United_Kingdom
dbo:wikiPageID
44162441
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1088356115
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Restoration_spectacular dbr:Richard_Wagner dbr:The_Frogs dbr:Prostitution dbr:Martin_Puchner n6:Tertullian's_Prescription_Against_Hereticks.jpg dbr:Puritan dbr:Aphra_Behn n6:Wilberforce_john_rising.jpg dbr:Gambling dbr:The_Era_(newspaper) dbr:Restoration_comedy dbr:Atlantic_slave_trade dbr:William_Makepeace_Thackeray dbr:Charles_Lamb dbr:Friedrich_Nietzsche dbr:Marian_exiles dbr:Ben_Greet dbr:Mary_II_of_England dbr:Mary_I_of_England dbr:Effeminization dbr:Aristophanes dbr:Stewart_Headlam dbr:Shakespeare dbr:John_Jackson_(bishop) dbr:Michael_Fried dbr:Jeremy_Collier dbr:British_Board_of_Film_Classification dbr:Plutarch dbr:William_Macready n6:Jean-Jacques_Rousseau_(painted_portrait).jpg n6:ChesterMysteryPlay_300dpi.jpg dbr:Domestic_Manners_of_the_Americans dbr:Bartholomew_Fair_(play) n6:Charles_Lamb.jpg dbr:De_spectaculis dbr:Fanny_Price dbr:Good_versus_evil n6:Stewart_Headlam.jpg dbr:The_School_for_Scandal dbr:Walter_Benjamin n6:ShortView1698.png dbr:John_Witherspoon dbr:William_Hague dbr:Elizabethan_era dbr:Konstantin_Stanislavski dbr:Christ dbr:University_of_California,_Berkeley dbr:Mansfield_Park dbr:Ancient_Greek_culture dbr:Book_of_Deuteronomy dbr:Ascetical_theology n6:Ben_Jonson_by_George_Vertue_1730_(cropped).jpg dbr:William_Wilberforce dbr:Confessions_(Augustine) dbr:Thomas_Becon dbr:Short_View_of_the_Immorality_and_Profaneness_of_the_English_Stage dbr:Giuseppe_Verdi dbr:Auguste_Comte dbr:Lovers'_Vows dbr:François_de_La_Rochefoucauld_(writer) dbr:Jansenism dbr:Roman_Empire dbr:Mimesis n6:Mp-Brock-03.jpg dbr:Philip_Stubbs dbr:William_Congreve dbr:France n6:William_Morton,_theatre_manager.jpg dbr:Glorious_Revolution dbr:Cicero dbr:Licensing_Act_1737 dbr:Liturgical_drama n6:Wenceslas_Hollar_-_Prynne_cropped.jpg dbr:Mystery_plays dbr:Richard_Brinsley_Sheridan dbr:Paula_Byrne n6:London._Royalty_Theatre._Advertising_postcard._1912.jpg dbr:Avant-garde dbr:Modernism dbr:Frances_Milton_Trollope dbr:Greek_drama dbr:William_III_of_England dbr:George_Norman_Clark dbr:Closet_drama dbr:Wilson_Barrett dbr:Performance dbr:Cockfighting dbr:William_Shakespeare dbr:Boy_player dbr:Christmas n6:Aphra_Behn.jpg dbr:Horse_racing dbr:Cinematograph_Act_1909 dbr:The_Sign_of_the_Cross_(play) dbr:Republic_(Plato) dbc:Theatre_criticism dbr:Plato dbr:Psychomachia dbr:Eleonora_Duse dbr:Master_of_the_Revels dbr:Stephen_Gosson dbr:Film_censorship_in_the_United_Kingdom dbr:English_Restoration dbr:Walter_Scott dbr:William_Prynne dbr:Becky_Sharp_(character) dbr:Timothy_Dwight_IV dbr:Pierre_Nicole dbr:Elizabeth_Inchbald dbc:British_drama dbr:Charles_II_of_England dbr:William_Morton_(theatre_manager) dbr:John_Vanbrugh n6:Thomas_Becon.jpg dbc:Theatre_in_the_United_Kingdom dbr:Bible dbr:George_Bernard_Shaw dbr:Lord_Byron n6:Portrait_of_Plato;_bust._Wellcome_M0005618.jpg dbr:Court_masques dbr:Moralia dbr:Edmund_Kean dbr:Tertullian dbr:Princeton_College dbr:Henrietta_Street,_Covent_Garden dbr:Decorum dbr:Mime dbr:London_theatre_closure_1642 dbr:Claire_Tomalin dbr:Jane_Austen dbr:Jean-Jacques_Rousseau dbr:Victor_Hugo dbr:Theatres_Act_1843 dbr:Histriomastix dbr:Theatres_Act_1968 dbr:Excommunication_of_actors_by_the_Catholic_Church dbr:Lollard dbr:St._Augustine dbr:Theater dbr:Phineas_Densmore_Gurley dbr:Hypocrites dbr:First_English_Civil_War dbr:Vanity_Fair_(novel) dbr:John_Chrysostom dbr:Yale_University dbc:History_of_theatre dbr:Taitian dbr:Society_for_the_Reformation_of_Manners dbr:Ben_Jonson dbr:Member_of_parliament
owl:sameAs
n15:nCBW wikidata:Q18352635
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Citation_needed dbt:Rp dbt:See_also dbt:Reflist dbt:' dbt:Main dbt:Quote
dbo:thumbnail
n10:London._Royalty_Theatre._Advertising_postcard._1912.jpg?width=300
dbp:source
0001-11-13
dbp:text
"So long as the drama had been content to be mainly the echo of the pulpit, some bond of sympathy, however slight, continued to exist between priests and players. But as soon as the theatre claimed to have a voice of its own, to have its own aims and objects, its own field of enterprise, its own mode of action, that bond was broken. The functions of the church were found to be different from those of the theatre; and because their functions were different the fatal fallacy, which has been, and still is, the cause of so much misunderstanding, sprang at once into existence, that therefore their interests must be opposed." "The artistic conscience, struggling against the grossness of the physical stage, striving to free itself from the despotism of the actors, resembles the spirit warring against the flesh, the soul wrestling with the body, or the virtues launching their assault on the vices. But the persistence of the struggle seems to suggest that it is more than a temporary skirmish: it reflects an abiding tension in our natures as social beings." "Sir, knowing your valuable paper to be the only medium through which the 'poor player' can defend himself and his honest calling against the bigotry, slander, and unchristian misrepresentations of certain reverend mawworms who occasionally attack the Drama and its expounders, I venture to forward you this communication... These aforesaid mawworms, creaming over with a superabundance of piety, and blinded by too much zeal, forget their divine calling, and stem to profit little by the divine behest which bears reference to evil-speaking and slander." "Histrio-mastix. The players scourge, or, actors tragædie, divided into two parts. Wherein it is largely evidenced, by divers arguments, by the concurring authorities and resolutions of sundry texts of Scripture, that popular stage-playes are sinfull, heathenish, lewde, ungodly spectacles, and most pernicious corruptions; condemned in all ages, as intolerable mischiefes to churches, to republickes, to the manners, mindes, and soules of men. And that the profession of play-poets, of stage-players; together with the penning, acting, and frequenting of stage-playes, are unlawfull, infamous and misbeseeming Christians. All pretences to the contrary are here likewise fully answered; and the unlawfulnes of acting, of beholding academicall enterludes, briefly discussed; besides sundry other particulars concerning dancing, dicing, health-drinking, &c. of which the table will informe you." His ambitious and energetic promotion of his views may well have contributed to the changed social conventions which dominated the Victorian age after his death, creating a British society very different from the licentious London against which he had revolted in the 1780s. As one of the ‘Fathers of the Victorians’ his views once again seem dated when seen from the vantage point of the more relaxed morality of later times, but in relation to his basic view that the long-term happiness of a society depends on how individuals behave towards each other, how families hold together, and how leaders keep the trust of people, who can say with confidence that he was wrong? "For in the theatre, dens of iniquity though they may be, if a man is fond of a particular actor, and enjoys his art as a great or even as the very greatest good, he is fond of all who join with him in admiration of his favorite, not for their own sakes, but for the sake of him whom they admire in common; and the more fervent he is in his admiration, the more he works in every way he can to secure new admirers for him, and the more anxious he becomes to show him to others; and if he find anyone comparatively indifferent, he does all he can to excite his interest by urging his favorite's merits. If, however, he meet with anyone who opposes him, he is exceedingly displeased by such a man's contempt of his favorite, and strives in every way he can to remove it. Now, if this be so, what does it become us to do who live in the fellowship of the love of God, the enjoyment of whom is the true happiness of life...?" Tonight at the Grand opera house Wilson Barrett produced his new play, "The Sign of the Cross." to a large audience. It is a professed attempt to conciliate the prejudices which church members are said to have for the stage and to bring the two nearer together. Of the play, the actor-author says: "With 'The Sign of the Cross' I stand today half way over the bridge that I have striven to construct to span the gulf between the two. I think it is but justice to expect the denouncers of my profession to come the other half of the way to meet me." "Among the most dangerous resorts for pleasure is the theater. Instead of being a school of morality and virtue, as is so often claimed, it is the very hotbed of immorality. Vicious habits and sinful propensities are strengthened and confirmed by these entertainments. Low songs, lewd gestures, expressions, and attitudes, deprave the imagination and debase the morals. Every youth who habitually attends such exhibitions will be corrupted in principle. There is no influence in our land more powerful to poison the imagination, to destroy religious impressions, and to blunt the relish for the tranquil pleasures and sober realities of life than theatrical amusements. The love for these scenes increases with every indulgence, as the desire for intoxicating drinks strengthens with its use. The only safe course is to shun the theater, the circus, and every other questionable place of amusement." "It is well-known that the Kirk of Scotland, strict, if not somewhat stern in its observances, is utterly opposed to all theatrical exhibitions; in fact, amusement of any kind is in direct opposition to the gloomy Calvinistic tenets on which the Presbyterian Kirk is based. Kean's arrival in Edinburgh made a great stir [c.1820]. In Auld Reekie, the more rigid viewed his coming with anything but pleasure. Many really pious and well-meaning teachers of the word were very strenuous in their exertions to prevent their flocks being contaminated by a visit under such strong temptations. A certain clergyman was extremely anxious to prevent any collision between the lambs of the elect and the children of Satan, as he conscientiously believed his followers and the Corps Dramatique to be, and earnestly cautioned the major part of his flock, particularly his own family, not to go near the theatre."
dbo:abstract
Antitheatricality is any form of opposition or hostility to theater. Such opposition is as old as theater itself, suggesting a deep-seated ambivalence in human nature about the dramatic arts. Jonas Barish's 1981 book, The Antitheatrical Prejudice, was, according to one of his Berkeley colleagues, immediately recognized as having given intellectual and historical definition to a phenomenon which up to that point had been only dimly observed and understood. The book earned the American Theater Association's Barnard Hewitt Award for outstanding research in theater history. Barish and some more recent commentators treat the anti-theatrical, not as an enemy to be overcome, but rather as an inevitable and valuable part of the theatrical dynamic. Antitheatrical views have been based on philosophy, religion, morality, psychology, aesthetics and on simple prejudice. Opinions have focussed variously on the art form, the artistic content, the players, the lifestyle of theater people, and on the influence of theater on the behaviour and morals of individuals and society. Anti-theatrical sentiments have been expressed by government legislation, philosophers, artists, playwrights, religious representatives, communities, classes, and individuals. The earliest documented objections to theatrical performance were made by Plato around 380 B.C. and re-emerged in various forms over the following 2,500 years. Plato's philosophical objection was that theatrical performance was inherently distanced from reality and therefore unworthy. Church leaders would rework this argument in a theological context. A later aesthetic variation, which led to closet drama, valued the play, but only as a book. From Victorian times, critics complained that self-aggrandizing actors and lavish stage settings were getting in the way of the play. Plato's moral objections were echoed widely in Roman times, leading eventually to theater's decline. During the Middle Ages, theatrical performance gradually re-emerged, the mystery plays accepted as part of church life. From the 16th century onwards, once theater was re-established as an independent profession, concerns were regularly raised that the acting community was inherently corrupt and that acting had a destructive moral influence on both actors and audiences. These views were often expressed during the emergence of Protestant, Puritan and Evangelical movements.
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Antitheatricality?oldid=1088356115&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
62686
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Antitheatricality