This HTML5 document contains 128 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n18https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/426/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
n17https://scholar.google.com/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
n23http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n13https://law.justia.com/cases/minnesota/supreme-court/1975/
n11https://www.oyez.org/cases/1975/
n10https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
n24http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep426/usrep426373/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
n14https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/109478/bryan-v-itasca-county/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n8http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n6https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/426/373/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Bryan_v._Itasca_County
rdf:type
yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Case107308889 wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:Case yago:Event100029378 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 owl:Thing dbo:UnitOfWork dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase dbo:LegalCase yago:Happening107283608
rdfs:label
Bryan v. Itasca County
rdfs:comment
Bryan v. Itasca County, 426 U.S. 373 (1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a state did not have the right to assess a tax on the property of a Native American (Indian) living on tribal land absent a specific Congressional grant of authority to do so.
foaf:name
Russell Bryan v. Itasca County, Minnesota
foaf:depiction
n8:Skokomish_Casino_Lucky_Dog.jpg n8:Mnchippewamap.png n8:US_Supreme_Court_Justice_William_Brennan_-_1972_official_portrait.jpg
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:Itasca_County,_Minnesota dbc:Native_American_history_of_Minnesota dbc:1976_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court dbc:Minnesota_Chippewa_Tribe dbc:United_States_Native_American_case_law dbc:United_States_Native_American_tax_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
27638016
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1110036586
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:California_v._Cabazon_Band_of_Mission_Indians dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Minnesota dbr:Native_American_gaming dbr:William_J._Brennan,_Jr. dbr:Minnesota_Attorney_General dbr:United_States_Constitution dbr:Menominee_Tribe_of_Indians_v._United_States dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:Itasca_County,_Minnesota dbr:Minnesota_Chippewa_Tribe dbr:Mescalero_Apache_Tribe_v._Jones dbr:Minnesota_District_Courts dbr:Commerce_Clause dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbc:Native_American_history_of_Minnesota dbr:Indian_Gaming_Regulatory_Act dbr:Washington,_D.C. dbr:Declaratory_relief dbr:Indigenous_people_of_the_United_States n23:Skokomish_Casino_Lucky_Dog.JPG dbr:UCLA_School_of_Law dbr:Tribal_sovereignty_in_the_United_States dbr:White_Earth_Band_of_Ojibwe dbc:1976_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Worcester_v._Georgia dbr:Certiorari dbr:Statutory_construction dbc:Minnesota_Chippewa_Tribe dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court dbr:Mobile_home dbr:Squaw_Lake,_Minnesota dbr:United_States_Congress dbr:Bingo_(U.S.) dbr:Itasca_County,_Minnesota dbr:Minnesota_Supreme_Court n23:Mnchippewamap.png dbr:Indian_termination_policy dbr:California dbr:Native_American_Rights_Fund dbr:University_of_California,_Los_Angeles dbr:McClanahan_v._Arizona_State_Tax_Comm'n dbr:Injunction dbr:Public_Law_280 dbc:United_States_Native_American_case_law dbr:U.S._LEXIS n23:US_Supreme_Court_Justice_William_Brennan_-_1972_official_portrait.jpg dbr:Class_action dbc:United_States_Native_American_tax_case_law dbr:Legislative_history dbr:Red_Lake_Indian_Reservation dbr:Leech_Lake_Band_of_Ojibwe dbr:Leech_Lake_Indian_Reservation dbr:Amicus_curae
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n6:case.html n11:75-5027 n13:44947-1.html n17:scholar_case%3Fcase=17647976997607556124 n18:373.html n14: n24:usrep426373.pdf
owl:sameAs
n10:4ciau wikidata:Q4980490 yago-res:Bryan_v._Itasca_County freebase:m.0cmb06t
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Ussc dbt:Cite_court dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Good_article dbt:Native_American_rights dbt:Usc dbt:Caselaw_source
dbo:thumbnail
n8:Mnchippewamap.png?width=300
dbp:joinmajority
unanimous
dbp:oyez
n11:75-5027
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:uspage
373
dbp:usvol
426
dbp:arguedate
0001-04-20
dbp:argueyear
1976
dbp:case
Bryan v. Itasca County,
dbp:courtlistener
n14:
dbp:decidedate
0001-06-14
dbp:decideyear
1976
dbp:findlaw
n18:373.html
dbp:fullname
Russell Bryan v. Itasca County, Minnesota
dbp:holding
Minnesota did not have the right to assess a tax on the property of an Indian living on tribal land absent a specific Congressional grant of authority to do so
dbp:justia
n6:case.html
dbp:litigants
Bryan v. Itasca County
dbp:majority
Brennan
dbp:loc
n24:usrep426373.pdf
dbo:abstract
Bryan v. Itasca County, 426 U.S. 373 (1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a state did not have the right to assess a tax on the property of a Native American (Indian) living on tribal land absent a specific Congressional grant of authority to do so. The case arose when a Minnesota county taxed an Indian's mobile home located on the reservation. The Court ruled that the state did not have the authority to impose such a tax or, more generally, to regulate behavior on the reservation. Bryan has become a landmark case that has led to Indian gaming on reservations and altered the economic status of almost every Indian tribe. Later decisions, citing Bryan, ruled that Public Law 280 allows states to enact prohibitions, or crimes, that would apply on reservations, but could not impose regulations on conduct that was otherwise allowed. The case has also called into question the ability of the states to impose any sort of regulations on tribal reservations, such as labor standards and certain traffic regulations.
dbp:googlescholar
n17:scholar_case%3Fcase=17647976997607556124
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Bryan_v._Itasca_County?oldid=1110036586&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
18013
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Bryan_v._Itasca_County