This HTML5 document contains 50 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n13https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n19http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n16http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Cable_&_Wireless_plc_v_Muscat
rdf:type
yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Happening107283608 yago:Event100029378
rdfs:label
Cable & Wireless plc v Muscat
rdfs:comment
Cable & Wireless plc v Muscat [2006] EWCA Civ 220 is a UK labour law case, concerning the test for an implied contract between an employee and a place they work through an employment agency. It holds that with reference to the reality of the relationship, an implied contract should be found according to the ordinary rules of construction.
dbp:name
Cable & Wireless plc v Muscat
foaf:depiction
n16:Cable_&_Wireless_Worldwide.svg
dcterms:subject
dbc:Court_of_Appeal_(England_and_Wales)_cases dbc:2006_in_case_law dbc:United_Kingdom_labour_case_law dbc:2006_in_British_law
dbo:wikiPageID
33352886
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1082968853
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:The_Aramis dbc:Court_of_Appeal_(England_and_Wales)_cases dbr:Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales dbc:2006_in_case_law dbc:United_Kingdom_labour_case_law dbr:UK_labour_law dbr:Cable_&_Wireless_plc dbr:Employment_agency dbr:TUPER_1981 dbc:2006_in_British_law
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n19:220.html
owl:sameAs
n13:4rpMo freebase:m.0h7q0sg wikidata:Q6940227
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Infobox_court_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Cquote dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Cite_BAILII dbt:Clist_worker_scope dbt:Start_date
dbo:thumbnail
n16:Cable_&_Wireless_Worldwide.svg?width=300
dbp:citations
, [2006] ICR 975
dbp:court
dbr:Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales
dbp:fullName
Cable & Wireless Plc v Mr P Muscat
dbp:judges
Sir Anthony Clarke MR, Smith LJ and Maurice Kay LJ
dbp:keywords
Implied contract, sham terms
dbo:abstract
Cable & Wireless plc v Muscat [2006] EWCA Civ 220 is a UK labour law case, concerning the test for an implied contract between an employee and a place they work through an employment agency. It holds that with reference to the reality of the relationship, an implied contract should be found according to the ordinary rules of construction.
dbp:dateDecided
2006-03-09
gold:hypernym
dbr:Case
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Cable_&_Wireless_plc_v_Muscat?oldid=1082968853&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
4683
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Cable_&_Wireless_plc_v_Muscat