This HTML5 document contains 88 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n21https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
umbel-rchttp://umbel.org/umbel/rc/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n13https://www.oyez.org/cases/1990/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n20http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep500/usrep500565/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/
n15https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/500/565/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:California_v._Acevedo
rdf:type
umbel-rc:Event yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:Case owl:Thing yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase dbo:LegalCase yago:Abstraction100002137 dbo:UnitOfWork yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Happening107283608 yago:Event100029378 wikidata:Q2334719 yago:Case107308889
rdfs:label
California v. Acevedo
rdfs:comment
California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565 (1991), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court, which interpreted the Carroll doctrine to provide one rule to govern all automobile searches. The Court stated, "The police may search an automobile and the containers within it where they have probable cause to believe contraband or evidence is contained." The decision also overruled the distinctions in United States v. Chadwick (1977) and Arkansas v. Sanders (1979) which had previously held that, if probable cause existed to search an automobile, the police may perform a warrantless search of the automobile and the containers within it, but if the police only had probable cause to search a container in the automobile, the police first had to obtain a warrant before searching the container.
foaf:name
California v. Charles Steven Acevedo
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbc:Legal_history_of_California dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_decisions_that_overrule_a_prior_Supreme_Court_decision dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court dbc:1991_in_United_States_case_law dbc:1991_in_California
dbo:wikiPageID
17953596
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
992641208
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Probable_cause dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Lists_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_volume dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Rehnquist_Court dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_500 dbr:Arizona_v._Gant dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbr:Arkansas_v._Sanders dbc:Legal_history_of_California dbc:1991_in_California dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_decisions_that_overrule_a_prior_Supreme_Court_decision dbc:1991_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court dbr:Carroll_v._United_States dbr:United_States_v._Chadwick dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Automobile dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n13:89-1690 n15: n20:usrep500565.pdf
owl:sameAs
freebase:m.047qby2 yago-res:California_v._Acevedo n21:4egr6 wikidata:Q5021296
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:US4thAmendment dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Ussc dbt:SCOTUS-case-stub dbt:Wikisource dbt:Caselaw_source
dbp:dissent
White Stevens
dbp:joindissent
Marshall
dbp:joinmajority
Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter
dbp:lawsapplied
dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:oyez
n13:89-1690
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
25920.0
dbp:uspage
565
dbp:usvol
500
dbp:arguedate
0001-01-08
dbp:argueyear
1991
dbp:case
California v. Acevedo,
dbp:decidedate
0001-05-30
dbp:decideyear
1991
dbp:fullname
California v. Charles Steven Acevedo
dbp:holding
Police, in a search extending only to a container within an automobile, may search the container without a warrant where they have probable cause to believe that it holds contraband or evidence.
dbp:justia
n15:
dbp:litigants
California v. Acevedo
dbp:majority
Blackmun
dbp:loc
n20:usrep500565.pdf
dbo:abstract
California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565 (1991), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court, which interpreted the Carroll doctrine to provide one rule to govern all automobile searches. The Court stated, "The police may search an automobile and the containers within it where they have probable cause to believe contraband or evidence is contained." The decision also overruled the distinctions in United States v. Chadwick (1977) and Arkansas v. Sanders (1979) which had previously held that, if probable cause existed to search an automobile, the police may perform a warrantless search of the automobile and the containers within it, but if the police only had probable cause to search a container in the automobile, the police first had to obtain a warrant before searching the container. It thereby confirmed Carroll v. United States (1925), which held that a warrantless search of an automobile based upon probable cause to believe that the vehicle contained evidence of crime in the light of an exigency arising out of the vehicle's likely disappearance did not contravene the Fourth Amendment's Warrant Clause. Wikisource has original text related to this article:California v. Acevedo
dbp:concurrence
Scalia
dbp:overturnedPreviousCase
Arkansas v. Sanders
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:California_v._Acevedo?oldid=992641208&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
4499
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:California_v._Acevedo