This HTML5 document contains 125 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n15https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n19https://scholar.google.com/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
n4https://www.oyez.org/cases/1993/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
dbpedia-kohttp://ko.dbpedia.org/resource/
n26http://www.vh1.com/news/270137/luther-campbell-first-amendment-supreme-court-case/
n31https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
n14https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/510/
n24https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/112936/campbell-v-acuff-rose-music-inc/
umbel-rchttp://umbel.org/umbel/rc/
n27https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/754/1150/2353338/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
n21https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/929/700/123794/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
n20http://supreme.justia.com/us/510/569/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n23http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep510/usrep510569/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n22https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/972/1429/178597/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n29https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/25/297/571821/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Campbell_v._Acuff-Rose_Music,_Inc.
rdf:type
yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRehnquistCourt dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases umbel-rc:Event yago:Case107308889 dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:Event100029378 wikidata:Q2334719 yago:Happening107283608 yago:Abstraction100002137 owl:Thing dbo:Case
rdfs:label
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. 캠프벨 대 어큐프-로즈 뮤직 사건
rdfs:comment
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994), was a United States Supreme Court copyright law case that established that a commercial parody can qualify as fair use. This case established that the fact that money is made by a work does not make it impossible for fair use to apply; it is merely one of the components of a fair use analysis. 캠프벨 대 어큐프-로즈 뮤직 사건(510 U.S. 569 (1994))은 미국 연방대법원의 저작권 소송 사건으로 상업적인 패러디도 공정이용으로 볼 수 있다는 판결이 내려진 사건이다. 금전적인 이익은 공정이용 분석의 요건중의 하나일 뿐이므로, 상업적 이용이라서 항상 공정이용에 해당하지 않는 것은 아니라는 판결이다.
foaf:name
Luther R. Campbell a.k.a. Luke Skyywalker, et al., Petitioners v. Acuff-Rose Music, Incorporated
dcterms:subject
dbc:1994_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court dbc:Fair_use_case_law dbc:United_States_copyright_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
2847441
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1117063862
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Law_library dbr:F._Supp. dbr:Fair_use dbr:Copyright dbr:Nashville,_Tennessee dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_510 dbr:M.D._Tenn. dbr:Remand_(court_procedure) dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Berlin_v._E.C._Publications,_Inc. dbr:F.2d dbr:Lists_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_volume dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Rehnquist_Court dbc:1994_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Justice_Story dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:2_Live_Crew dbr:Justice_Souter dbr:Lord_Ellenborough dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court dbr:License dbr:Luther_Campbell dbr:Copyright_Act_of_1976 dbr:Folsom_v._Marsh dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Parody dbr:Sony_Corp._of_America_v._Universal_City_Studios,_Inc. dbr:United_States_Code dbr:NXIVM_Corp._v._The_Ross_Institute dbr:6th_Cir. dbc:United_States_copyright_case_law dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Roy_Orbison dbc:Fair_use_case_law dbr:Luke_Records dbr:F.3d dbr:Copyright_law dbr:United_States_Reports dbr:Acuff-Rose_Music dbr:Oh,_Pretty_Woman dbr:Certiorari
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n4:92-1292 n14:569.html n15:92-1292.ZS.html n19:scholar_case%3Fcase=16686162998040575773 n21: n22: n23:usrep510569.pdf n20:case.html n24: n26: n27: n29:
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q5028189 dbpedia-ko:캠프벨_대_어큐프-로즈_뮤직_사건 freebase:m.086kr9 yago-res:Campbell_v._Acuff-Rose_Music,_Inc. n31:4fWti
dbp:subsequent
25920.0
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:2_Live_Crew dbt:Cite_journal dbt:USArticleI dbt:USCopyrightActs
dbp:joinmajority
unanimous
dbp:lawsapplied
Copyright Act of 1976; 17 U.S.C. §§ 101, 107
dbp:oyez
n4:92-1292
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
17280.0
dbp:uspage
569
dbp:usvol
510
dbp:arguedate
0001-11-09
dbp:argueyear
1993
dbp:case
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.,
dbp:courtlistener
n24:
dbp:decidedate
0001-03-07
dbp:decideyear
1994
dbp:findlaw
n14:569.html
dbp:fullname
Luther R. Campbell a.k.a. Luke Skyywalker, et al., Petitioners v. Acuff-Rose Music, Incorporated
dbp:holding
The commercial nature of a parody does not render it a presumptively unfair use of copyrighted material. Rather, a parody's commercial character is only one element that should be weighed in a fair use inquiry.
dbp:justia
n20:case.html
dbp:litigants
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.
dbp:majority
Souter
dbp:loc
n23:usrep510569.pdf
dbo:abstract
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994), was a United States Supreme Court copyright law case that established that a commercial parody can qualify as fair use. This case established that the fact that money is made by a work does not make it impossible for fair use to apply; it is merely one of the components of a fair use analysis. 캠프벨 대 어큐프-로즈 뮤직 사건(510 U.S. 569 (1994))은 미국 연방대법원의 저작권 소송 사건으로 상업적인 패러디도 공정이용으로 볼 수 있다는 판결이 내려진 사건이다. 금전적인 이익은 공정이용 분석의 요건중의 하나일 뿐이므로, 상업적 이용이라서 항상 공정이용에 해당하지 않는 것은 아니라는 판결이다.
dbp:concurrence
Kennedy
dbp:cornell
n15:92-1292.ZS.html
dbp:googlescholar
n19:scholar_case%3Fcase=16686162998040575773
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Campbell_v._Acuff-Rose_Music,_Inc.?oldid=1117063862&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
11600
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Campbell_v._Acuff-Rose_Music,_Inc.