This HTML5 document contains 155 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n9http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:
n21https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/supreme-court-review/2018/9/
n13https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/
n27http://www.journaloftechlaw.org/issues/
n16https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
n23https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n24https://www.leagle.com/decision/
n20https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles/
n26http://www.journaloftechlaw.org/
n10https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/carpenter-v-united-states-2/
n18https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/585/16-402/
n28http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n17https://www.oyez.org/cases/2017/
dbpedia-zhhttp://zh.dbpedia.org/resource/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n12https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Carpenter_v._United_States
rdf:type
wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase owl:Thing dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork dbo:Case
rdfs:label
卡本特訴美國案 Carpenter v. United States
rdfs:comment
Carpenter v. United States, 138 S.Ct. 2206 (2018), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning the privacy of historical cell site location information (CSLI). The Court held that the government violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution when it accesses historical CSLI records containing the physical locations of cellphones without a search warrant. 卡本特訴美國案（Carpenter v. United States），是美國最高法院的一個里程碑式的判例，涉及（CSLI）的隱私問題。美國首席大法官約翰·羅伯茨提出的5–4判決之裁定，致法院認爲美國政府違反了美國憲法第四修正案，即因政府搜查了手機位置資訊的歷史記錄，其中也包含沒有搜查令的手機之實際位置資訊。
foaf:name
Timothy Ivory Carpenter v. United States of America
foaf:depiction
n28:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States_-_Roberts_Court_2017.jpg
dcterms:subject
dbc:Telecommunications_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:Search_and_seizure_case_law dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit_cases dbc:Global_Positioning_System dbc:2010s_in_Detroit dbc:2018_in_United_States_case_law dbc:2016_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Mobile_phone_culture
dbo:wikiPageID
54275492
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1122487655
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Remand_(court_procedure) dbc:Mobile_phone_culture dbc:Search_and_seizure_case_law dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbr:Global_Positioning_System dbr:Mobile_phone dbr:RadioShack dbr:Supreme_Court_Review n9:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States_-_Roberts_Court_2017.jpg dbr:Mobile_phone_tracking dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit_cases dbr:Search_warrant dbr:Triangulation dbr:Cell_site_location_information dbr:Cell_site dbr:Certiorari dbr:F.3d dbc:Global_Positioning_System dbr:GPS dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit dbr:Search_and_seizure dbr:John_Roberts dbr:Expectation_of_privacy_(United_States) dbr:T-Mobile_US dbr:Detroit dbr:Amicus_curiae dbr:Neil_Gorsuch dbr:Third-party_doctrine dbr:Smith_v._Maryland dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Samuel_Alito dbr:SCOTUSblog dbr:Anthony_Kennedy dbr:Smartphone dbr:Good_faith_(law) dbr:Expectation_of_privacy dbc:2010s_in_Detroit dbr:Exclusionary_rule dbc:2018_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Cato_Supreme_Court_Review dbr:Tower_dumps dbr:6th_Cir. dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Video_surveillance dbr:Davis_v._United_States_(2011) dbr:FBI dbr:Harvard_Law_Review dbr:Journal_of_Tech_Law dbr:List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_the_United_States dbc:Telecommunications_law dbc:2016_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Michigan dbr:United_States_v._Jones_(2012)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n10: n13:viewcontent.cgi%3Farticle=3394&context=facpub n18: n20:2061 n21:2018-cato-supreme-court-review-4.pdf%7C n17:16-402 n23:205-235_Online.pdf%7C n24:infco20160413094 n26:your-spying-smartphone-vania-chaker n27:23-2-chaker n12:16-402_h315.pdf
owl:sameAs
n16:pFMo dbpedia-zh:卡本特訴美國案 wikidata:Q19023931
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:US4thAmendment dbt:Bluebook_journal dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Ussc dbt:Reflist dbt:SCOTUS_oral_arguments dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case
dbo:thumbnail
n28:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States_-_Roberts_Court_2017.jpg?width=300
dbp:dissent
Alito Thomas Kennedy Gorsuch
dbp:docket
16
dbp:joindissent
Thomas, Alito Thomas
dbp:joinmajority
Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan
dbp:opinionannouncement
n12:16-402_h315.pdf
dbp:oralargument
n17:16-402
dbp:oyez
n17:16-402
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
25920.0
dbp:uspage
___
dbp:usvol
585
dbp:arguedate
0001-11-29
dbp:argueyear
2017
dbp:case
Carpenter v. United States,
dbp:decidedate
0001-06-22
dbp:decideyear
2018
dbp:first
Susan Trevor Stephen Wm. James
dbp:fullname
Timothy Ivory Carpenter v. United States of America
dbp:holding
Government acquisition of cell-site records is a search under the Fourth Amendment, and, thus requires a warrant.
dbp:justia
n18:
dbp:last
Burrus Freiwald Knight Smith
dbp:litigants
Carpenter v. United States
dbp:majority
Roberts
dbp:otherSource
Supreme Court
dbp:otherUrl
n12:16-402_h315.pdf
dbp:page
79 205
dbp:title
Katz Nipped and Katz Cradled: Carpenter and the Evolving Fourth Amendment The Supreme Court, 2017 Term — Comment: The Carpenter Chronicle: A Near-Perfect Surveillance
dbp:url
https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/supreme-court-review/2018/9/2018-cato-supreme-court-review-4.pdf| year=2018 https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/205-235_Online.pdf| year=2018
dbp:volume
2017 132
dbo:abstract
Carpenter v. United States, 138 S.Ct. 2206 (2018), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning the privacy of historical cell site location information (CSLI). The Court held that the government violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution when it accesses historical CSLI records containing the physical locations of cellphones without a search warrant. Prior to Carpenter, government entities could obtain cellphone location records by claiming the information was required as part of an investigation. After Carpenter, government entities are required to obtain a search warrant to access that information. Recognizing the influence of new consumer communications devices in the 2010s, the Court expanded its conceptions of constitutional rights toward the privacy of this type of data. However, the Court emphasized that the Carpenter ruling was narrowly restricted to the precise types of information and search procedures that were relevant to Carpenter's complaint. 卡本特訴美國案（Carpenter v. United States），是美國最高法院的一個里程碑式的判例，涉及（CSLI）的隱私問題。美國首席大法官約翰·羅伯茨提出的5–4判決之裁定，致法院認爲美國政府違反了美國憲法第四修正案，即因政府搜查了手機位置資訊的歷史記錄，其中也包含沒有搜查令的手機之實際位置資訊。
dbp:journal
dbr:Harvard_Law_Review dbr:Cato_Supreme_Court_Review
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Carpenter_v._United_States?oldid=1122487655&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
30152
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Carpenter_v._United_States