This HTML5 document contains 68 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n10https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
n6https://www.oyez.org/cases/2021/
n18https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/539/19-1442/
n4https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n16https://www.oyez.org/cases/2020/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Carr_v._Saul
rdf:type
wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:LegalCase owl:Thing dbo:UnitOfWork dbo:Case dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:label
Carr v. Saul
rdfs:comment
Carr v. Saul, 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court concerning the Appointments Clause.
foaf:name
Willie Earl Carr, et al. v. Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security John J. Davis, et al. v. Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_administrative_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:Appointments_Clause_case_law dbc:2021_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_separation_of_powers_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
71209302
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1096304090
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbc:United_States_administrative_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Exhaustion_of_remedies dbc:Appointments_Clause_case_law dbr:Appointments_Clause dbc:United_States_separation_of_powers_case_law dbc:2021_in_United_States_case_law
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n4:19-1442_971e.pdf n16:19-1442 n6:19-1442 n18:
owl:sameAs
n10:GWS6h wikidata:Q113127389
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Reflist dbt:US_Appointments_Clause dbt:Ussc dbt:SCOTUS-case-stub dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Caselaw_source
dbp:docket
19 20
dbp:joinmajority
Roberts, Alito, Kagan, Kavanaugh; Thomas, Gorsuch, Barrett ; Breyer
dbp:lawsapplied
dbr:Appointments_Clause
dbp:oralargument
n16:19-1442
dbp:oyez
n6:19-1442
dbp:uspage
___
dbp:usvol
593
dbp:arguedate
0001-03-03
dbp:argueyear
2021
dbp:case
Carr v. Saul,
dbp:decidedate
0001-04-22
dbp:decideyear
2021
dbp:fullname
John J. Davis, et al. v. Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security Willie Earl Carr, et al. v. Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
dbp:holding
A petitioner need not challenge the constitutionality of an agency's structure under the Appointments Clause in an internal agency administrative proceeding in order to present that challenge in court on appeal.
dbp:justia
n18:
dbp:litigants
Carr v. Saul
dbp:majority
Sotomayor
dbp:otherSource
Supreme Court
dbp:otherUrl
n4:19-1442_971e.pdf
dbo:abstract
Carr v. Saul, 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court concerning the Appointments Clause.
dbp:concurrence
Thomas Breyer
dbp:joinconcurrence
Gorsuch, Barrett
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Carr_v._Saul?oldid=1096304090&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
1938
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Carr_v._Saul