This HTML5 document contains 62 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n16https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/234/679/5751/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n17https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
n8https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/105542/carroll-v-united-states/
n13https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/354/394/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n6https://www.oyez.org/cases/1956/
n18https://www.leagle.com/decision/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n9http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep354/usrep354394/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Carroll_v._United_States_(1957)
rdf:type
owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:UnitOfWork dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:LegalCase
rdfs:label
Carroll v. United States (1957)
rdfs:comment
Carroll v. United States, 354 U.S. 394 (1957), was a case dealing with the appealablility of a suppression order issued by the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia for an unlawful warrant under the Fourth Amendment. In a unanimous 9-0 opinion written by Justice Warren, the Supreme Court of the United States reversed the Court of Appeals, stating that: The Court held that, although some orders may be appealable under the authority of 18 U.S.C. 1291, this order in this case lacked such authority. The Circuit Court was reversed and remanded.
foaf:name
Leon F. Carroll and Daniel J. Stewart v. United States
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:1957_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court
dbo:wikiPageID
64462191
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1073056739
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_Columbia dbr:Certiorari dbc:1957_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Search_incident_to_arrest dbr:F.2d dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court dbr:D.C._Cir. dbr:D.D.C. dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Probable_cause dbr:F._Supp.
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n6:571 n9:usrep354394.pdf n16: n18:1955746126fsupp6201618 n13: n8:
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q97180294 n17:CnkDg
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Primary_sources dbt:Reflist dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Ussc
dbp:joinmajority
unanimous
dbp:oyez
n6:571
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
17280.0
dbp:uspage
394
dbp:usvol
354
dbp:arguedate
0001-04-04
dbp:argueyear
1957
dbp:case
Carroll v. United States,
dbp:courtlistener
n8:
dbp:decidedate
0001-06-24
dbp:decideyear
1957
dbp:fullname
Leon F. Carroll and Daniel J. Stewart v. United States
dbp:holding
The order of suppression of evidence in this case by the District Court is not appealable under the statutes of the federal appeals courts; therefore, the appeal should've been dismissed.
dbp:justia
n13:
dbp:litigants
Carroll v. United States
dbp:majority
Warren
dbp:loc
n9:usrep354394.pdf
dbo:abstract
Carroll v. United States, 354 U.S. 394 (1957), was a case dealing with the appealablility of a suppression order issued by the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia for an unlawful warrant under the Fourth Amendment. In February of 1957, officers arrested Carroll and Stewart on John Doe arrest warrants for violations of local lottery laws. During the detainment, officers conducted a Search Incident to Arrest and seized evidence from their person. They petitioned the District Court for suppression of the evidence on grounds that the warrants were null and void due to the lack of the Constitutionally required probable cause under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The District Court granted the petition. The Government appeals to the Federal Court of Appeals, which reversed the suppression order. In a unanimous 9-0 opinion written by Justice Warren, the Supreme Court of the United States reversed the Court of Appeals, stating that: 𝐼𝑑 𝑖𝑠 π‘Žπ‘₯π‘–π‘œπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘, π‘Žπ‘  π‘Ž π‘šπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘œπ‘“ β„Žπ‘–π‘ π‘‘π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘¦ π‘Žπ‘  𝑀𝑒𝑙𝑙 π‘Žπ‘  π‘‘π‘œπ‘π‘‘π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘›π‘’, π‘‘β„Žπ‘Žπ‘‘ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ 𝑒π‘₯𝑖𝑠𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 π‘œπ‘“ π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘’π‘™π‘™π‘Žπ‘‘π‘’ π‘—π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘ π‘‘π‘–π‘π‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘› 𝑖𝑛 π‘Ž 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐 π‘“π‘’π‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘™ π‘π‘œπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘‘ π‘œπ‘£π‘’π‘Ÿ π‘Ž 𝑔𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑛 𝑑𝑦𝑝𝑒 π‘œπ‘“ π‘π‘Žπ‘ π‘’ 𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑑 π‘’π‘π‘œπ‘› π‘Žπ‘’π‘‘β„Žπ‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘‘π‘¦ 𝑒π‘₯π‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ π‘ π‘™π‘¦ π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘“π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘‘ 𝑏𝑦 π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘‘π‘’π‘‘π‘’. The Court held that, although some orders may be appealable under the authority of 18 U.S.C. 1291, this order in this case lacked such authority. The Circuit Court was reversed and remanded.
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Carroll_v._United_States_(1957)?oldid=1073056739&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
4361
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Carroll_v._United_States_(1957)