This HTML5 document contains 194 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n4https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n29https://scholar.google.com/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
n24https://www.oyez.org/cases/2004/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
dbpedia-kohttp://ko.dbpedia.org/resource/
n25https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/545/
n23https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
umbel-rchttp://umbel.org/umbel/rc/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n8https://www.leagle.com/decision/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n22https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/545/1/
n21https://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2004/2004_03_1454/argument/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n27https://openjurist.org/545/us/
n30http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n18https://
n19https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/799995/gonzales-v-raich/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
n28https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/352/1222/478670/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Gonzales_v._Raich
rdf:type
yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases umbel-rc:Event wikidata:Q2334719 yago:Event100029378 owl:Thing dbo:Case yago:Case107308889 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 dbo:UnitOfWork dbo:LegalCase yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:label
곤잘레스 대 라익 사건 Gonzales v. Raich
rdfs:comment
곤잘레스 대 라익 사건(Gonzales v. Raich , 54 U.S. 1 (2005))은 통상조항 관련 미국 연방 대법원의 유명 판례이다. 대마초의 소지, 배포를 금지하는 연방법과 개인적 의료상 이유의 재배를 허락하는 캘리포니아 법이 충돌하는 사안에서 개인의료 목적으로 재배된 것이라 하더라도 그 중 얼마는 주간시장으로 흘러들어갈 것이며, 그 양을 모두 합하며 주간시장에 상당한 영향을 미치기에 연방의회의 규제대상이 된다고 연방대법원이 판결하였다. Gonzales v. Raich (previously Ashcroft v. Raich), 545 U.S. 1 (2005), was a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that under the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Congress may criminalize the production and use of homegrown cannabis even if state law allows its use for medicinal purposes.
foaf:name
Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General, et al. v. Angel McClary Raich, et al.
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Commerce_Clause_case_law dbc:United_States_Constitution_Article_One_case_law dbc:2005_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Medicinal_use_of_cannabis dbc:Cannabis_in_California dbc:United_States_controlled_substances_case_law dbc:2005_in_cannabis dbc:Cannabis_law_in_the_United_States dbc:History_of_Butte_County,_California dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court
dbo:wikiPageID
30870593
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1120845322
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Katherine_Harris dbr:United_States_v._Lopez dbc:United_States_Constitution_Article_One_case_law dbr:Butte_County_Sheriff's_Department dbr:Dana_Rohrabacher dbr:Injunction dbr:Antonin_Scalia dbc:United_States_Commerce_Clause_case_law dbr:Medical_marijuana dbr:Cannabis_(drug) dbr:Declaratory_judgment dbr:Attorney_general dbr:Necessary_and_Proper_Clause dbr:Machine_guns dbr:Hinchey-Rohrabacher_medical_marijuana_amendment dbr:United_States_Congress dbr:Commerce_Clause dbr:Harry_Pregerson dbr:L._Ed._2d dbc:2005_in_United_States_case_law dbr:9th_Cir. dbr:Eric_Holder dbr:Prosecute dbr:F.3d dbr:Tenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Maurice_Hinchey dbr:Oroville,_California dbr:Originalism dbr:International_Narcotics_Control_Board dbr:1996_California_Proposition_215 dbr:Southern_United_States dbr:Separate_sovereigns dbr:US_Department_of_Justice dbr:United_States_House_of_Representatives dbc:Medicinal_use_of_cannabis dbr:Partnership_for_a_Drug-Free_America dbr:Wickard_v._Filburn dbr:Libertarianism dbr:Substantive_due_process dbr:Mississippi dbr:Clarence_Thomas dbr:South_Dakota_v._Dole dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_545 dbr:Medical_necessity dbr:Alabama dbc:Cannabis_in_California dbr:John_Paul_Stevens dbr:New_Deal dbr:Ninth_Circuit_Court_of_Appeals dbr:N.D._Cal. dbr:Controlled_Substances_Act dbr:Louis_Brandeis dbr:C-SPAN dbr:Comprehensive_Drug_Abuse_Prevention_and_Control_Act_of_1970 dbr:Mark_Souder dbr:U.S._Constitution dbr:Institute_for_Justice dbr:Maryland dbr:United_States_v._Stewart_(2003) dbr:Sandra_Day_O'Connor dbr:Amicus_briefs dbr:Oakland,_California dbr:Single_Convention_on_Narcotic_Drugs dbr:Supremacy_Clause dbr:Hamid_Ghodse dbr:Alberto_Gonzales dbr:California_Proposition_215_(1996) dbr:States'_rights dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbr:Community_Rights_Council dbr:Marijuana_Tax_Act_of_1937 dbr:Marijuana_Control,_Regulation,_and_Education_Act dbc:United_States_controlled_substances_case_law dbr:Washington_(U.S._state) dbr:Federal_government_of_the_United_States dbc:2005_in_cannabis dbr:Rohrabacher–Farr_amendment dbr:Randy_Barnett dbr:Drug_Enforcement_Administration dbr:California dbr:Medical_cannabis dbr:F._Supp._2d dbc:History_of_Butte_County,_California dbr:Arrest dbr:National_Organization_for_the_Reform_of_Marijuana_Laws dbr:Louisiana dbc:Cannabis_law_in_the_United_States dbr:War_on_Drugs dbr:Legal_history_of_marijuana_in_the_United_States dbr:Cato_Institute dbr:U.S._Supreme_Court dbr:New_State_Ice_Co._v._Liebmann dbr:United_States_v._Morrison dbr:Brian_Lamb dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court dbr:Ninth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:William_Rehnquist dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n4:03-1454.ZS.html n8:20031166248fsupp2d91811082 n18:www.thorburnlawgroup.com n19: n22: n25:1.html n28: n29:scholar_case%3Fcase=15647611274064109718 n30:codes_displaySection.xhtml%3FsectionNum=11362.5&lawCode=HSC n27:1 n21: n24:03-1454
owl:sameAs
yago-res:Gonzales_v._Raich wikidata:Q5582161 n23:4kK8e dbpedia-ko:곤잘레스_대_라익_사건 freebase:m.06dkxc
dbp:subsequent
None
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:USArticleI dbt:Original_research dbt:Cannabis_in_the_United_States dbt:Primary_sources dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Quote dbt:Ussc dbt:Reflist dbt:Multiple_issues dbt:Short_description dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case
dbp:dissent
O'Connor Thomas
dbp:joindissent
Rehnquist, Thomas
dbp:joinmajority
Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
dbp:lawsapplied
U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 3, 18 ; Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 801–971 ; California Compassionate Use Act of 1996, California Health & Safety Code § 11362.5
dbp:oralargument
n21:
dbp:oyez
n24:03-1454
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
25920.0
dbp:uspage
1
dbp:usvol
545
dbp:arguedate
0001-11-29
dbp:argueyear
2004
dbp:case
Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1
dbp:courtlistener
n19:
dbp:decidedate
0001-06-06
dbp:decideyear
2005
dbp:findlaw
n25:1.html
dbp:fullname
Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General, et al. v. Angel McClary Raich, et al.
dbp:holding
Congress may ban the use of cannabis even if states approve it for medicinal purposes.
dbp:justia
n22:
dbp:litigants
Gonzales v. Raich
dbp:majority
Stevens
dbo:abstract
곤잘레스 대 라익 사건(Gonzales v. Raich , 54 U.S. 1 (2005))은 통상조항 관련 미국 연방 대법원의 유명 판례이다. 대마초의 소지, 배포를 금지하는 연방법과 개인적 의료상 이유의 재배를 허락하는 캘리포니아 법이 충돌하는 사안에서 개인의료 목적으로 재배된 것이라 하더라도 그 중 얼마는 주간시장으로 흘러들어갈 것이며, 그 양을 모두 합하며 주간시장에 상당한 영향을 미치기에 연방의회의 규제대상이 된다고 연방대법원이 판결하였다. Gonzales v. Raich (previously Ashcroft v. Raich), 545 U.S. 1 (2005), was a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that under the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Congress may criminalize the production and use of homegrown cannabis even if state law allows its use for medicinal purposes.
dbp:concurrence
Scalia
dbp:cornell
n4:03-1454.ZS.html
dbp:googlescholar
n29:scholar_case%3Fcase=15647611274064109718
dbp:openjurist
n27:1
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Gonzales_v._Raich?oldid=1120845322&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
26592
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Gonzales_v._Raich