This HTML5 document contains 293 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
n39http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/docs/common/opinions/200507/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/
n31http://www.willamette.edu/~blong/LegalEssaysII/
dbpedia-mshttp://ms.dbpedia.org/resource/
n28https://web.archive.org/web/20060705074010/http:/jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2006/07/
n17https://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2005/2005_05_184/argument/
n52https://web.archive.org/web/20090923184524/http:/moviesblog.mtv.com/2009/09/22/george-clooney-to-direct-matt-damon-in-aaron-sorkins-war-on-terror/
n26https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/05pdf/
n16http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n47https://archive.org/details/challengehamdanv00mahl/page/
n11https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/
n14http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
n35http://majorbenjamintalmadge.blogspot.com/2009/03/national-security-law-for-policymakers.html/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n24https://web.archive.org/web/20060624005214/http:/jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2006/03/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
n21https://web.archive.org/web/20170216013347/https:/www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/
n32https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/
n34http://www.wlf.org/upload/
n13https://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2005/2005_05_184/briefs/
umbel-rchttp://umbel.org/umbel/rc/
n45http://writ.corporate.findlaw.com/dorf/
n50https://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/
n7http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2009/09/22/george-clooney-to-direct-matt-damon-in-aaron-sorkins-war-on-terror/
n12https://web.archive.org/web/20050913031126/http:/www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2004/0responses/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbpedia-dehttp://de.dbpedia.org/resource/
n42https://web.archive.org/web/20060218164446/http:/www.defenselink.mil/news/Mar2002/
n10https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/29/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
n33https://web.archive.org/web/20051221082643/http:/phrusa.org/research/torture/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbpedia-nlhttp://nl.dbpedia.org/resource/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
n48https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
n40https://fas.org/irp/congress/2006_hr/
n43http://www.nybooks.com/articles/
n30https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/548/557/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
n38https://web.archive.org/web/20060109233235/http:/www.wlf.org/Litigating/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n29https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/
n27https://web.archive.org/web/20091111085043/http:/www.humanrightsfirst.org/pdf/
n9https://archive.org/details/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n25https://web.archive.org/web/20060703151319/http:/jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2006/06/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Hamdan_v._Rumsfeld
rdf:type
yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:Act100030358 yago:WikicatGeorgeW.BushAdministrationControversies umbel-rc:Event dbo:UnitOfWork owl:Thing dbo:LegalCase yago:Case107308889 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase wikidata:Q2334719 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:Controversy107183151 yago:Disagreement107180787 yago:Dispute107181935 yago:SpeechAct107160883 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 dbo:Case
rdfs:label
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld Hamdan v. Rumsfeld Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
rdfs:comment
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that military commissions set up by the Bush administration to try detainees at Guantanamo Bay violated both the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and the Geneva Conventions ratified by the U.S. Hamdan v. Rumsfeld was de rechtszaak voor het Hooggerechtshof van de Verenigde Staten in Washington D.C. van Salim Hamdan, de bodyguard en chauffeur van Osama bin Laden die sinds 2001 op Guantánamo Bay zonder aanklacht gevangen wordt gehouden, tegen Donald Rumsfeld, minister van Defensie van de Verenigde Staten, onder president George W. Bush. Hamdan werd bijgestaan door Charles D. Swift, advocaat van de Amerikaanse marine, en Neal Katyal, professor in de rechten aan de Emory University School of Law. Die Entscheidung des Obersten Gerichts der Vereinigten Staaten im Fall Hamdan v. Rumsfeld ist das dritte Präzedenzurteil zu Maßnahmen der US-Regierung im so genannten „Krieg gegen den Terror“ betreffend Personen, die als ungesetzliche Kombattanten festgehalten werden. Sie verbietet die Praxis der US-Regierung, die prozessualen und materiellen Rechte der Gefangenen massiv einzuschränken, und stellt fest, dass für Sondergerichte in Form von „Militärkommissionen“ keine Rechtsgrundlage besteht.
foaf:name
Salim Ahmed Hamdan, Petitioner v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, United States Secretary of Defense; John D. Altenburg, Jr., Appointing Authority for Military Commissions, Department of Defense; Brigadier General Thomas L. Hemingway, Legal Advisor to the Appointing Authority for Military Commissions; Brigadier General Jay Hood, Commander Joint Task Force, Guantanamo, Camp Echo, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; George W. Bush, President of the United States
foaf:depiction
n16:Anthony_Kennedy_Official.jpg n16:John_Paul_Stevens,_SCOTUS_photo_portrait.jpg
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:2006_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:Guantanamo_Bay_captives_legal_and_administrative_procedures dbc:Extrajudicial_prisoners_of_the_United_States dbc:Donald_Rumsfeld_litigation dbc:George_W._Bush_administration_controversies dbc:United_States_military_case_law dbc:Human_rights_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
2273091
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1112462287
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Jurisdiction dbr:Nuremberg_Trials dbr:Illegal_combatant dbr:Yemen dbr:Occam's_razor dbr:United_States dbr:Congressional_Record dbr:Tony_Snow dbr:Laws_of_war dbr:John_Paul_Stevens dbr:Guantanamo_Bay_detainment_camp dbr:McCain_Detainee_Amendment dbr:JURIST n14:John_Paul_Stevens,_SCOTUS_photo_portrait.jpg dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbr:Common_law dbr:Federal_Reporter dbr:Central_Intelligence_Agency dbr:U.S._Senate_Committee_on_the_Judiciary dbr:Authorization_for_Use_of_Military_Force_Against_Terrorists dbr:United_States_Congress dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:2006_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:John_Roberts dbc:Guantanamo_Bay_captives_legal_and_administrative_procedures dbr:Lindsey_Graham dbr:National_Security_Agency dbr:Habeas_corpus_in_the_United_States n14:Anthony_Kennedy_Official.jpg dbr:Stephen_Breyer dbr:U.S._Navy_Judge_Advocate_General's_Corps dbr:Combatant_Status_Review_Tribunal dbr:FindLaw dbr:Equity_(law) dbr:Tribunal dbr:United_States_Constitution dbr:Signing_statement dbr:Federal_Supplement dbr:Ex_parte_Quirin dbc:Extrajudicial_prisoners_of_the_United_States dbr:United_States_Solicitor_General dbr:Charles_Swift dbr:Hearsay dbr:Prisoner_of_war dbr:United_States_Secretary_of_Defense dbr:Courts-martial_in_the_United_States dbr:Neal_Katyal dbr:Detainee_Treatment_Act dbr:Scott_Silliman dbr:John_Warner dbr:United_States_Navy dbr:Stenberg_v._Carhart dbr:David_D._Cole dbr:Georgetown_University_Law_Center dbr:Unlawful_enemy_combatants dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_District_of_Columbia_Circuit dbr:Federal_law_(United_States) dbr:Washington_Legal_Foundation dbr:Supremacy_Clause dbr:Donald_Rumsfeld dbr:Seattle_University dbr:Canadians dbr:Slate_(magazine) dbr:Unitary_executive_theory dbr:Arlen_Specter dbr:Prejudice dbr:Cuba dbr:The_Washington_Post dbr:Jon_Kyl dbr:Hamdi_v._Rumsfeld dbc:Donald_Rumsfeld_litigation dbr:A._Raymond_Randolph dbr:CSRT dbr:Al_Qaeda dbr:Anthony_Kennedy dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Clarence_Thomas dbr:Overt_act dbr:Johnson_v._Eisentrager dbr:Antonin_Scalia dbr:Kibibyte dbr:Habeas_corpus dbc:George_W._Bush_administration_controversies dbr:Charles_D._Swift dbr:Youngstown_Sheet_&_Tube_Co._v._Sawyer dbr:Bagram_Air_Base dbr:Military_Commissions_Act_of_2006 dbr:Combatant dbr:Salim_Ahmed_Hamdan dbr:Geneva_Conventions dbr:US_Department_of_Justice dbr:Physicians_for_Human_Rights dbr:Schlesinger_v._Councilman dbr:Rasul_v._Bush dbr:Boumediene_v._Bush dbr:Guantanamo_Bay_detention_camp dbr:War_in_Afghanistan_(2001–present) dbr:Military_Commission_Order_No._1 dbr:Writ_of_Habeas_Corpus dbr:Guantanamo_military_commission dbr:Certiorari dbr:Writ_of_habeas_corpus dbr:Jihad dbr:Al-Qaeda dbr:Paul_Clement dbr:James_Robertson_(judge) dbr:Bruner_v._United_States dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_548 dbr:Motion_to_dismiss dbr:MTV dbr:Legal_case dbr:Enemy_combatant dbr:Omar_Khadr dbr:Geneva_convention dbr:NSA_warrantless_surveillance_controversy dbc:United_States_military_case_law dbr:Uniform_Code_of_Military_Justice dbr:Statute dbr:United_States_Department_of_Justice dbr:Black_sites dbr:Conspiracy_(crime) dbr:The_New_York_Review_of_Books dbr:Rapanos_v._United_States dbr:NSA_electronic_surveillance_program dbr:Court-martial dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Suspension_Clause dbr:Associate_Justice dbr:Amicus_curiae dbr:Foreign_Intelligence_Surveillance_Act dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_Columbia dbr:Emily_Bazelon dbr:Federal_government_of_the_United_States dbr:USA_Today dbr:Judge_Advocate_General's_Corps dbr:Hague_Conventions_(1899_and_1907) dbr:Stephen_F._Williams dbc:Human_rights_case_law dbr:Rules_of_evidence dbr:Osama_bin_Laden dbr:Bush_administration_(2000) dbr:Perkins_Coie
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n7:%23more-21632%7Ctitle=George n9:grandinquestshis00rehn_0 n10:AR2006062900928_pf.html n11:A49809-2004Jul14.html n12:2004-0702.resp.html n11:A50013-2004Jul14.html n13:Amicus%20Brief%20of%20Quirin%20Historians_001.pdf n17: n21:05-184.pdf n24:why-hamdan-is-right-about-conspiracy.php n25:hamdan-v-rumsfeld-supreme-court.php n28:hamdan-common-article-3-and-true.php n31:GuantanamoI.html n29:05-184.ZS.html n26:05-184.pdf n32:05-184.pdf n33:amicusbrief-hamdan.html n34:071505LURS.pdf n35: n27:090723-LS-in-pursuit-justice-09-update.pdf n38:casedetail.asp%3Fdetail=303 n39:04-5393a.pdf n30: n40:071106silliman.html n42:d20020321ord.pdf n43:19212 n45:20050720.html n47:285 n29:05-184.ZD2.html n29:05-184.ZO.html n50:2004-08-24-gitmo-driver_x.htm n29:05-184.ZC.html n29:05-184.ZC1.html n29:05-184.ZD.html n29:05-184.ZD1.html n52:%23more-21632%7Carchive-date=September
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q476339 freebase:m.06_y4n dbpedia-nl:Hamdan_v._Rumsfeld dbpedia-ms:Hamdan_lwn._Rumsfeld n48:4Qptr yago-res:Hamdan_v._Rumsfeld dbpedia-de:Hamdan_v._Rumsfeld
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Small dbt:USGWOTlaw dbt:Reflist dbt:USC dbt:For dbt:'%22 dbt:Ussc dbt:Webarchive dbt:Primary_sources dbt:Citation dbt:Cite_news dbt:Cite_web dbt:Use_mdy_dates dbt:Expand_section dbt:Cite_book dbt:Short_description dbt:Main dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Blockquote dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Good_article
dbo:thumbnail
n16:John_Paul_Stevens,_SCOTUS_photo_portrait.jpg?width=300
dbp:dissent
Scalia Thomas Alito
dbp:docket
5
dbp:joindissent
Thomas, Alito Scalia; Alito Scalia, Thomas
dbp:joinmajority
Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
dbp:lawsapplied
U.S. Const.; Geneva Conventions, Common Arts. 2 & 3; UCMJ, Arts. 21 & 36; Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 §1005; AUMF
dbp:oralargument
n17:
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
25920.0
dbp:uspage
557
dbp:usvol
548
dbp:arguedate
0001-03-28
dbp:argueyear
2006
dbp:case
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld,
dbp:date
2009-11-11
dbp:decidedate
0001-06-29
dbp:decideyear
2006
dbp:fullname
Salim Ahmed Hamdan, Petitioner v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, United States Secretary of Defense; John D. Altenburg, Jr., Appointing Authority for Military Commissions, Department of Defense; Brigadier General Thomas L. Hemingway, Legal Advisor to the Appointing Authority for Military Commissions; Brigadier General Jay Hood, Commander Joint Task Force, Guantanamo, Camp Echo, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; George W. Bush, President of the United States
dbp:holding
Military commission to try petitioner is illegal and lacking the protections required under the Geneva Conventions and United States Uniform Code of Military Justice.
dbp:justia
n30:
dbp:litigants
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
dbp:majority
Stevens
dbp:otherSource
Supreme Court
dbp:otherUrl
n26:05-184.pdf
dbp:title
In Pursuit of Justice; Prosecuting Terrorism Cases in the Federal Courts
dbp:url
n27:090723-LS-in-pursuit-justice-09-update.pdf
dbo:abstract
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld was de rechtszaak voor het Hooggerechtshof van de Verenigde Staten in Washington D.C. van Salim Hamdan, de bodyguard en chauffeur van Osama bin Laden die sinds 2001 op Guantánamo Bay zonder aanklacht gevangen wordt gehouden, tegen Donald Rumsfeld, minister van Defensie van de Verenigde Staten, onder president George W. Bush. Op 29 juni 2006 bepaalde het gerecht met een meerderheid van 5 tegen 3 dat de door de regering Bush opgezette speciale militaire tribunalen voor de gevangenen van Guantánamo Bay niet toegestaan waren onder de bepalingen van het Amerikaanse militaire recht (Amerikaanse Uniform Code of Military Justice) en het internationaal recht (Conventie van Genève, 1949). Hamdan werd bijgestaan door Charles D. Swift, advocaat van de Amerikaanse marine, en Neal Katyal, professor in de rechten aan de Emory University School of Law. De zaak Hamdan v. Rumsfeld is beschreven in de thriller The Challenge (2008) van . In augustus 2008 kocht de Amerikaanse acteur en filmmaker George Clooney de rechten van het boek. Die Entscheidung des Obersten Gerichts der Vereinigten Staaten im Fall Hamdan v. Rumsfeld ist das dritte Präzedenzurteil zu Maßnahmen der US-Regierung im so genannten „Krieg gegen den Terror“ betreffend Personen, die als ungesetzliche Kombattanten festgehalten werden. Sie verbietet die Praxis der US-Regierung, die prozessualen und materiellen Rechte der Gefangenen massiv einzuschränken, und stellt fest, dass für Sondergerichte in Form von „Militärkommissionen“ keine Rechtsgrundlage besteht. Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that military commissions set up by the Bush administration to try detainees at Guantanamo Bay violated both the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and the Geneva Conventions ratified by the U.S. Hamdan raises several legal issues: Whether the United States Congress may pass legislation preventing the Supreme Court from hearing the case of an accused combatant before his military commission takes place; whether the special military commissions established by the executive branch violated federal law (including the UCMJ and treaty obligations); and whether courts can enforce the articles of the Geneva Conventions. An unusual aspect of the case was an amicus brief filed by Senators Jon Kyl and Lindsey Graham, which presented an "extensive colloquy" added to the Congressional record as evidence that "Congress was aware" that the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 would strip the Supreme Court of jurisdiction to hear cases brought by the Guantanamo detainees. Because these statements were not included in the December 21 debate at the time, Emily Bazelon of Slate magazine has argued that their brief was an attempt to mislead the court. After hearing oral arguments on March 28, 2006, on June 29, 2006, the Court issued a 5–3 decision holding that it had jurisdiction; that the administration lacked either the constitutional power or congressional authorization to establish these particular military commissions; that, absent such authority, the military commissions had to comply with the "ordinary laws" of the U.S. and of war, which include the UCMJ and the Geneva Conventions incorporated therein; and that Hamdan's trial, having violated the rights and procedures under both bodies of law, was illegal.
dbp:concurrence
Breyer Kennedy
dbp:cornell
n29:05-184.ZS.html
dbp:joinconcurrence
Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
dbp:joinplurality
Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
dbp:notparticipating
Roberts
dbp:plurality
Stevens
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Hamdan_v._Rumsfeld?oldid=1112462287&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
51419
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Hamdan_v._Rumsfeld