This HTML5 document contains 141 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dbpedia-dehttp://de.dbpedia.org/resource/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n13http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:
n16https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
n15https://www.oyez.org/cases/2019/
n11https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n14https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/591/18-9526/
n21http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbpedia-frhttp://fr.dbpedia.org/resource/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:McGirt_v._Oklahoma
rdf:type
wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase owl:Thing dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork dbo:Case
rdfs:label
McGirt v. Oklahoma McGirt v. Oklahoma McGirt v. Oklahoma
rdfs:comment
McGirt v. Oklahoma bezeichnet ein Gerichtsverfahren, das vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten verhandelt und mit dessen Urteil am 9. Juli 2020 abgeschlossen wurde. Es gilt als eines der weitreichendsten Urteile des Gerichts in den letzten 50 Jahren. Das Gericht entschied, dass das Indianerreservat der Muskogee-Indianer bei der Gründung des Staates Oklahoma nicht legal aufgelöst worden ist, und dass das Reservat in seinen Grenzen von 1866 fortbesteht.Grundlage für das Gerichtsverfahren bildete das Major Crimes Act aus dem Jahre 1885. Das Gericht entschied, dass Verbrechen, welche auf Reservatsgebiet begangen wurden, von einem Bundesgericht behandelt werden müssen, und nicht von einem Gericht des Staates Oklahoma. Auf dem Urteil baut das Gerichtsurteil Sharp v. Murphy auf, we McGirt v. Oklahoma est une décision de la Cour suprême des États-Unis arrêtée le 9 juillet 2020. Elle établit que la moitié orientale de l'Oklahoma fait toujours partie de cinq réserves indiennes jusqu'alors considérées comme démantelées de longue date, le Congrès des États-Unis n'en ayant pas explicitement décidé autrement. * Portail du droit * Portail des années 2020 * Portail des Nord-Amérindiens * Portail de l’Oklahoma McGirt v. Oklahoma, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case which ruled that, as pertaining to the Major Crimes Act, much of the eastern portion of the state of Oklahoma remains as Native American lands of the prior Indian reservations of the Five Civilized Tribes, never disestablished by Congress as part of the Oklahoma Enabling Act of 1906. As such, prosecution of crimes by Native Americans on these lands falls into the jurisdiction of the tribal courts and federal judiciary under the Major Crimes Act, rather than Oklahoma's courts.
rdfs:seeAlso
dbr:Oklahoma_v._Castro-Huerta dbr:Sharp_v._Murphy
foaf:name
Jimcy McGirt, Petitioner, v. Oklahoma
foaf:depiction
n21:Boundaries_of_the_Five_Tribes_in_1866.svg
dcterms:subject
dbc:Native_American_history_of_Oklahoma dbc:Broken_Arrow,_Oklahoma dbc:2020_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Native_American_case_law dbc:United_States_Native_American_criminal_jurisdiction_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:United_States_Native_American_treaty_case_law dbc:Seminole_tribe
dbo:wikiPageID
63925660
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1122267752
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Oklahoma_Tribal_Statistical_Area dbr:Neil_Gorsuch dbr:Ian_Heath_Gershengorn dbr:Suzerainty dbr:COVID-19_pandemic dbr:Trail_of_Tears dbc:United_States_Native_American_case_law dbr:Tulsa_County dbr:United_States_Congress dbc:Broken_Arrow,_Oklahoma dbr:List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_the_United_States n13:Boundaries_of_the_Five_Tribes_in_1866.svg dbr:Major_Crimes_Act dbr:Oklahoma_Supreme_Court dbc:United_States_Native_American_criminal_jurisdiction_case_law dbr:Tribal_court dbr:Quapaw,_Oklahoma dbr:Chickasaw_Nation dbr:Lawyers'_Edition dbr:Clarence_Thomas dbr:Elena_Kagan dbr:Ottawa_County,_Oklahoma dbr:Judiciary_of_Oklahoma dbr:Indian_reservation dbr:John_M._O'Connor dbr:Seminole dbr:Choctaw dbr:Indian_country_jurisdiction dbr:Kevin_Stitt dbr:Former_Indian_reservations_in_Oklahoma dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbr:Oklahoma_Court_of_Criminal_Appeals dbr:Broken_Arrow,_Oklahoma dbr:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg dbr:Muscogee dbr:Off-reservation_trust_land dbr:Muscogee_(Creek)_Nation dbr:Oklahoma_Enabling_Act dbr:Certiorari dbr:Statute_of_limitations dbr:Tribal_sovereignty_in_the_United_States dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Tenth_Circuit dbr:Cherokee dbr:Stephen_Breyer dbr:Five_Civilized_Tribes dbr:Federal_judiciary_of_the_United_States dbc:United_States_Native_American_treaty_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Per_curiam dbr:Oklahoma dbr:Sonia_Sotomayor dbr:Native_American_reservation_politics dbr:Sharp_v._Murphy dbc:Seminole_tribe dbr:Seminole_Nation_of_Oklahoma dbr:Chickasaw dbr:John_Roberts dbr:Samuel_Alito dbr:Brett_Kavanaugh dbr:Tulsa dbr:Quapaw_Nation dbr:Aboriginal_title_in_the_United_States dbr:Michael_J._Hunter dbr:Cherokee_Nation dbr:Oklahoma_v._Castro-Huerta dbr:Choctaw_Nation_of_Oklahoma dbc:2020_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Native_American_history_of_Oklahoma
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n14: n11:18-9526_9okb.pdf n15:18-9526
owl:sameAs
dbpedia-fr:McGirt_v._Oklahoma n16:C1GwS dbpedia-de:McGirt_v._Oklahoma wikidata:Q96392414
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:See_also dbt:Frac dbt:Native_American_rights dbt:Reflist dbt:Br dbt:Ussc dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case
dbo:thumbnail
n21:Boundaries_of_the_Five_Tribes_in_1866.svg?width=300
dbp:dissent
Thomas Roberts
dbp:docket
18
dbp:joindissent
Alito, Kavanaugh; Thomas
dbp:joinmajority
Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan
dbp:lawsapplied
Oklahoma Enabling ActMajor Crimes Act
dbp:oyez
n15:18-9526
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
Denial for relief, PC-2018-1057 ; Cert. granted, 140 S. Ct. 659
dbp:uspage
___
dbp:usvol
591
dbp:arguedate
0001-05-11
dbp:argueyear
2020
dbp:decidedate
0001-07-09
dbp:decideyear
2020
dbp:fullname
Jimcy McGirt, Petitioner, v. Oklahoma
dbp:holding
For Major Crimes Act purposes, land reserved for the Creek Nation since the 19th century remains "Indian country."
dbp:justia
n14:
dbp:litigants
McGirt v. Oklahoma
dbp:majority
Gorsuch
dbp:otherSource
Supreme Court
dbp:otherUrl
n11:18-9526_9okb.pdf
dbo:abstract
McGirt v. Oklahoma est une décision de la Cour suprême des États-Unis arrêtée le 9 juillet 2020. Elle établit que la moitié orientale de l'Oklahoma fait toujours partie de cinq réserves indiennes jusqu'alors considérées comme démantelées de longue date, le Congrès des États-Unis n'en ayant pas explicitement décidé autrement. * Portail du droit * Portail des années 2020 * Portail des Nord-Amérindiens * Portail de l’Oklahoma McGirt v. Oklahoma bezeichnet ein Gerichtsverfahren, das vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten verhandelt und mit dessen Urteil am 9. Juli 2020 abgeschlossen wurde. Es gilt als eines der weitreichendsten Urteile des Gerichts in den letzten 50 Jahren. Das Gericht entschied, dass das Indianerreservat der Muskogee-Indianer bei der Gründung des Staates Oklahoma nicht legal aufgelöst worden ist, und dass das Reservat in seinen Grenzen von 1866 fortbesteht.Grundlage für das Gerichtsverfahren bildete das Major Crimes Act aus dem Jahre 1885. Das Gericht entschied, dass Verbrechen, welche auf Reservatsgebiet begangen wurden, von einem Bundesgericht behandelt werden müssen, und nicht von einem Gericht des Staates Oklahoma. Auf dem Urteil baut das Gerichtsurteil Sharp v. Murphy auf, welches am selben Tag entschieden wurde. McGirt v. Oklahoma, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case which ruled that, as pertaining to the Major Crimes Act, much of the eastern portion of the state of Oklahoma remains as Native American lands of the prior Indian reservations of the Five Civilized Tribes, never disestablished by Congress as part of the Oklahoma Enabling Act of 1906. As such, prosecution of crimes by Native Americans on these lands falls into the jurisdiction of the tribal courts and federal judiciary under the Major Crimes Act, rather than Oklahoma's courts. McGirt was related to Sharp v. Murphy, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), heard in the 2018–19 term on the same question but which was believed to be deadlocked due to Justice Neil Gorsuch's recusal; Gorsuch recused because he had prior judicial oversight of the case. Sharp was decided per curiam alongside McGirt. In the wake of McGirt, Oklahoma state courts began reviewing and vacating past criminal cases heard at state courts involving Native Americans and transferred their overview to federal courts. However, this included crimes where the defendants were non-Native Americans but the victims were, which state government and law authorities believed was beyond the intent of the McGirt decision. In 2022 the Supreme Court ruled in Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta that jurisdiction to prosecute non-Native Americans who commit crimes against Native Americans on tribal lands was jointly held by federal and state governments.
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:McGirt_v._Oklahoma?oldid=1122267752&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
34348
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:McGirt_v._Oklahoma