This HTML5 document contains 114 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
n17http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n10https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
n19https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/
n18https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/593/19-863/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n14https://www.oyez.org/cases/2020/
n12http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Niz-Chavez_v._Garland
rdf:type
wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:Case owl:Thing dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork
rdfs:label
Niz-Chavez v. Garland
rdfs:comment
Niz-Chavez v. Garland, 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was an immigration decision by the United States Supreme Court. In a 6–3 decision authored by Neil Gorsuch, the Court ruled against the federal government, holding that deportation hearing notices need to be in a single document. Although a highly technical case, the decision received attention for being predicated on the single-letter word a.
foaf:name
Agusto Niz-Chavez, Petitioner v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General
foaf:depiction
n12:Neil_Gorsuch,_Anthony_Kennedy,_and_Brett_Kavanaugh.jpg
dcterms:subject
dbc:2021_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_immigration_and_naturalization_case_law dbc:History_of_immigration_to_the_United_States dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court
dbo:wikiPageID
69056977
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1094307445
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:William_Barr dbr:Lawyers'_Edition dbr:Deportation dbr:Barton_v._Barr dbr:Libertarianism_in_the_United_States dbr:American_Immigration_Lawyers'_Association dbc:2021_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Stephen_Breyer dbr:Federal_Appendix dbr:Clarence_Thomas dbr:John_Roberts dbr:Bostock_v._Clayton_County dbr:Anthony_Kennedy dbr:Antonin_Scalia dbr:Textualism dbr:Law_clerk dbr:Amy_Coney_Barrett dbr:Merrick_Garland dbr:Sonia_Sotomayor dbr:Donald_Trump_Supreme_Court_candidates dbr:Certiorari dbr:Samuel_Alito dbc:United_States_immigration_and_naturalization_case_law dbr:Circuit_split dbr:Guatemala dbr:Stephen_Yale-Loehr dbc:History_of_immigration_to_the_United_States dbr:Attorney_General_of_the_United_States dbr:Elena_Kagan dbr:Biden_administration dbr:Ideological_leanings_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_justices dbr:English_articles dbr:SCOTUSblog dbr:United_States_Department_of_Justice n17:Neil_Gorsuch,_Anthony_Kennedy,_and_Brett_Kavanaugh.jpg dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Plaintiff dbr:Neil_Gorsuch dbr:Cornell_Law_School dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit dbr:Illegal_Immigration_Reform_and_Immigrant_Responsibility_Act_of_1996 dbr:Board_of_Immigration_Appeals dbr:Georgetown_Preparatory_School dbr:Groundhog_Day_(film) dbr:Trump_administration dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbr:Green_card dbr:Pereira_v._Sessions dbr:Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc._v._Natural_Resources_Defense_Council,_Inc. dbr:Michigan
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n14:19-863 n18: n19:19-863_new_5426.pdf
owl:sameAs
n10:G5xCp wikidata:Q109297554
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Use_mdy_dates dbt:Nbsp dbt:Immigration_to_the_United_States dbt:Infobox_US_Supreme_Court_case dbt:As_of dbt:Reflist dbt:Rp dbt:Short_description dbt:'s dbt:Usc dbt:Ussc dbt:Blockquote dbt:Caselaw_source
dbo:thumbnail
n12:Neil_Gorsuch,_Anthony_Kennedy,_and_Brett_Kavanaugh.jpg?width=300
dbp:dissent
Kavanaugh
dbp:docket
19
dbp:joindissent
Roberts, Alito
dbp:joinmajority
Thomas, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, Barrett
dbp:lawsapplied
IIRIRA,
dbp:oyez
n14:19-863
dbp:parallelcitations
141 172800.0
dbp:prior
*Niz-Chavez v. Barr, 789 F. App'x 523 *Cert. granted, Niz-Chavez v. Barr, 141 S. Ct. 84
dbp:uspage
___
dbp:usvol
593
dbp:arguedate
0001-11-09
dbp:argueyear
2020
dbp:case
Niz-Chavez v. Garland,
dbp:decidedate
0001-04-29
dbp:decideyear
2021
dbp:fullname
Agusto Niz-Chavez, Petitioner v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General
dbp:holding
1229.0
dbp:justia
n18:
dbp:litigants
Niz-Chavez v. Garland
dbp:majority
Gorsuch
dbp:otherSource
Supreme Court
dbp:otherUrl
n19:19-863_new_5426.pdf
dbo:abstract
Niz-Chavez v. Garland, 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was an immigration decision by the United States Supreme Court. In a 6–3 decision authored by Neil Gorsuch, the Court ruled against the federal government, holding that deportation hearing notices need to be in a single document. Although a highly technical case, the decision received attention for being predicated on the single-letter word a.
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Niz-Chavez_v._Garland?oldid=1094307445&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
21120
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Niz-Chavez_v._Garland