This HTML5 document contains 103 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n24http://dbpedia.org/resource/Wikipedia:
n31http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/2009/06/
n13http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n4http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:
n30https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/
n14https://books.google.com/
n25https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:35761/
n26https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
n9https://escholarship.org/uc/item/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
n29http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n27https://www.jcel-pub.org/article/view/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n32http://dbpedia.org/resource/Idea/
n18https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_comm_ent_law_journal/vol11/iss1/
n23http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n17https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview/vol26/iss1/
dbpedia-arhttp://ar.dbpedia.org/resource/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Paraphrasing_of_copyrighted_material
rdf:type
yago:Cognition100023271 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Content105809192 yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Belief105941423 yago:WikicatLegalDoctrinesAndPrinciples yago:Doctrine105943300
rdfs:label
Paraphrasing of copyrighted material إعادة صياغة المواد المحمية بحقوق التأليف والنشر
rdfs:comment
Paraphrasing of copyrighted material may, under certain circumstances, constitute copyright infringement. In most countries that have national copyright laws, copyright applies to the original expression in a work rather than to the meanings or ideas being expressed. Whether a paraphrase is an infringement of expression, or a permissible restatement of an idea, is not a binary question but a matter of degree. Copyright law in common law countries tries to avoid theoretical discussion of the nature of ideas and expression such as this, taking a more pragmatic view of what is called the idea/expression dichotomy. The acceptable degree of difference between a prior work and a paraphrase depends on a variety of factors and ultimately depends on the judgement of the court in each individual cas قد ينخفض احتمال اكتشاف تزوير حقوق تأليف ونشر مادة ما إثر إعادة صياغة تلك المادة محفوظة الحقوق. لكن في الكثير من الحالات، اكتُشف أن إعادة الصياغة باستخدام الكلمات وتراكيب الجمل المختلفة عن الأصلية تُعتبر انتهاكًا لحقوق نشر وتأليف العمل الأصلي السابق لإعادة الصياغة. هناك درجة من القبول بخصوص الفرق بين العمل الأصلي والعمل المعاد صياغته بناءً على عدد من العوامل، وتعتمد درجة القبول تلك بشكل نهائي على قرار المحكمة بخصوص كل حالة فردية.
foaf:depiction
n23:Zedler_-_Protokoll_Verf%C3%BCgung_gegen_Zedler_(letzte_Seite).jpg n23:Zedler_-_Universal-Lexicon,_Band_1_(Titelblatt).jpg
dcterms:subject
dbc:Intellectual_property_law dbc:Legal_doctrines_and_principles
dbo:wikiPageID
36189390
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1112991731
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
n4:Zedler_-_Universal-Lexicon,_Band_1_(Titelblatt).jpg dbr:Touro_Law_Review dbr:Merger_doctrine_(copyright_law) dbc:Intellectual_property_law dbr:Second_Circuit dbr:Arnstein_v._Porter dbr:Circuit_split dbr:Harvard_University_Press dbr:Aspen_Publishers dbr:Article_spinning dbr:Kluwer_Law_International dbr:Copyright_law_of_the_Soviet_Union dbr:The_Journal_of_World_Intellectual_Property dbr:Michigan_State_Law_Review dbr:Paraphrase dbr:Grosses_vollständiges_Universal-Lexicon dbr:Feist_Publications,_Inc.,_v._Rural_Telephone_Service_Co. dbr:Threshold_of_originality n24:Close_paraphrasing dbc:Legal_doctrines_and_principles dbr:Copyright_Act_of_1976 dbr:Fair_use dbr:Federal_Judicial_Center dbr:Johann_Heinrich_Zedler dbr:Common_law dbr:Fordham_Intellectual_Property,_Media_and_Entertainment_Law_Journal dbr:Idea–expression_distinction dbr:Substantial_similarity dbr:Copyright_Clause dbr:Copyright_infringement dbr:Hastings_Communications_and_Entertainment_Law_Journal dbr:Dresden dbr:Search_engine_optimization dbr:Scènes_à_faire dbr:Georgetown_Law_Journal dbr:Copyright_law n32:expression_dichotomy
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n9:6j86d60d%7Cjournal= n13:Zedler_-_Protokoll_Verf%C3%BCgung_gegen_Zedler_(letzte_Seite).jpg%3Fuselang=de n14:books%3Fid=rQINrHtwNU0C&pg=PA243%7Caccess-date=2012-06-19 n14:books%3Fid=rdF_Ptl3PeAC&pg=PA31%7Caccess-date=2012-06-19%7Cyear=2011 n17:10%7Cjournal= n18:3%7Cjournal= n14:books%3Fid=IqWoTkiveVEC&pg=PA163%7Caccess-date=2012-06-19%7Cdate=2010-10-28 n14:books%3Fid=y16QAAAAMAAJ&q=gorman+copyright n25: n14:books%3Fid=JuVf2WVGXLIC&pg=PA130%7Caccess-date=2012-06-21 n27:6481%7Cjournal=Journal n29:viewcontent.cgi%3Farticle=1034&context=iplj n14:books%3Fid=6je0tPcGMzYC&pg=SA13-PA7 n30:jwip.12172%7Cjournal= n31:the-future-of-newspapers--posner.html n14:books%3Fid=L2P3EHagf8cC%7Ctitle=The n14:books%3Fid=8-4catWPy84C&pg=PA100%7Caccess-date=2012-06-19%7Cdate=2012-03-08 n14:books%3Fid=FetCwyUjdFwC&pg=PA162%7Caccess-date=2012-06-19%7Cdate=2008-03-19 n14:books%3Fid=3_v3HwgAaJ0C&pg=PA509%7Caccess-date=2012-06-24%7Cdate=2008-05-22
owl:sameAs
freebase:m.0k0vcb7 yago-res:Paraphrasing_of_copyrighted_material wikidata:Q7135661 n26:4tKMv dbpedia-ar:إعادة_صياغة_المواد_المحمية_بحقوق_التأليف_والنشر
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Intellectual_property dbt:Sfn dbt:Sfnm dbt:Refbegin dbt:Cite_book dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Refend dbt:Reflist dbt:Cite_web dbt:Harvid dbt:Selfref
dbo:thumbnail
n23:Zedler_-_Universal-Lexicon,_Band_1_(Titelblatt).jpg?width=300
dbp:1a
Bently Ginsburg Davis
dbp:1p
191
dbp:1y
2010
dbp:2a
Head
dbp:2p
243
dbp:2y
2006
dbo:abstract
Paraphrasing of copyrighted material may, under certain circumstances, constitute copyright infringement. In most countries that have national copyright laws, copyright applies to the original expression in a work rather than to the meanings or ideas being expressed. Whether a paraphrase is an infringement of expression, or a permissible restatement of an idea, is not a binary question but a matter of degree. Copyright law in common law countries tries to avoid theoretical discussion of the nature of ideas and expression such as this, taking a more pragmatic view of what is called the idea/expression dichotomy. The acceptable degree of difference between a prior work and a paraphrase depends on a variety of factors and ultimately depends on the judgement of the court in each individual case. قد ينخفض احتمال اكتشاف تزوير حقوق تأليف ونشر مادة ما إثر إعادة صياغة تلك المادة محفوظة الحقوق. لكن في الكثير من الحالات، اكتُشف أن إعادة الصياغة باستخدام الكلمات وتراكيب الجمل المختلفة عن الأصلية تُعتبر انتهاكًا لحقوق نشر وتأليف العمل الأصلي السابق لإعادة الصياغة. هناك درجة من القبول بخصوص الفرق بين العمل الأصلي والعمل المعاد صياغته بناءً على عدد من العوامل، وتعتمد درجة القبول تلك بشكل نهائي على قرار المحكمة بخصوص كل حالة فردية.
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Paraphrasing_of_copyrighted_material?oldid=1112991731&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
15891
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Paraphrasing_of_copyrighted_material