This HTML5 document contains 89 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
n22https://scholar.google.com/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n17https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n21https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/321/
n10https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/103933/prince-v-massachusetts/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n7https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/321/158/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n12http://openjurist.org/321/us/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/
n16http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep321/usrep321158/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Prince_v._Massachusetts
rdf:type
wikidata:Q2334719 yago:Event100029378 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:Abstraction100002137 owl:Thing yago:Abstraction105854150 yago:Idea105833840 dbo:UnitOfWork yago:Right105174653 yago:Happening107283608 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:LegalCase yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Concept105835747 yago:Case107308889 yago:WikicatChildren'sRights yago:Cognition100023271 dbo:Case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Content105809192
rdfs:label
Prince v. Massachusetts
rdfs:comment
Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158 (1944), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the government has broad authority to regulate the actions and treatment of children. Parental authority is not absolute and can be permissibly restricted if doing so is in the interests of a child's welfare. While children share many of the rights of adults, they face different potential harms from similar activities.
foaf:name
Sarah Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
dcterms:subject
dbc:1944_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_children's_rights_case_law dbc:Jehovah's_Witnesses_litigation_in_the_United_States dbc:Children's_rights dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Stone_Court
dbo:wikiPageID
13993502
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1048948805
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbr:Wiley_Blount_Rutledge dbc:1944_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Felix_Frankfurter dbr:Frank_Murphy dbr:Owen_Roberts dbr:L._Ed. dbc:United_States_children's_rights_case_law dbr:Jehovah's_Witness dbc:Children's_rights dbr:Children's_rights dbr:Robert_H._Jackson dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Stone_Court dbr:Jacobson_v._Massachusetts dbc:Jehovah's_Witnesses_litigation_in_the_United_States
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n10: n7: n21:158.html n12:158 n16:usrep321158.pdf n22:scholar_case%3Fcase=3012582275354260465
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q7244415 n17:4tt9E freebase:m.03cqfqg yago-res:Prince_v._Massachusetts
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Wikisource-inline dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:More_citations_needed dbt:Ussc dbt:Reflist dbt:Caselaw_source
dbp:dissent
Murphy Jackson
dbp:joindissent
Roberts, Frankfurter
dbp:joinmajority
Stone, Black, Reed, Douglas
dbp:parallelcitations
64
dbp:uspage
158
dbp:usvol
321
dbp:arguedate
0001-12-14
dbp:argueyear
1943
dbp:case
Prince v. Massachusetts,
dbp:courtlistener
n10:
dbp:decidedate
0001-01-31
dbp:decideyear
1944
dbp:findlaw
n21:158.html
dbp:fullname
Sarah Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
dbp:justia
n7:
dbp:litigants
Prince v. Massachusetts
dbp:majority
Rutledge
dbp:loc
n16:usrep321158.pdf
dbo:abstract
Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158 (1944), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the government has broad authority to regulate the actions and treatment of children. Parental authority is not absolute and can be permissibly restricted if doing so is in the interests of a child's welfare. While children share many of the rights of adults, they face different potential harms from similar activities.
dbp:googlescholar
n22:scholar_case%3Fcase=3012582275354260465
dbp:openjurist
n12:158
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Prince_v._Massachusetts?oldid=1048948805&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
6591
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Prince_v._Massachusetts