This HTML5 document contains 83 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dcthttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
dbpedia-kohttp://ko.dbpedia.org/resource/
n13https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Rule_in_Shelley's_Case
rdf:type
dbo:Country yago:Cognition100023271 yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Rule105846054 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Idea105833840 owl:Thing yago:WikicatCommonLawRules yago:Content105809192 yago:Concept105835747
rdfs:label
Rule in Shelley's Case 쉘리사건의 원칙
rdfs:comment
The Rule in Shelley's Case is a rule of law that may apply to certain future interests in real property and trusts created in common law jurisdictions. It was applied as early as 1366 in The Provost of Beverly's Case but in its present form is derived from Shelley's Case (1581), in which counsel stated the rule as follows: 쉘리사건의 원칙(Rule in Shelley's Case)란 자유보유권의 이전이 있으며, 동시에 피이전자의 법정상속인에게 직접 또는 간접으로 단순 봉토권(fee simple) 또는 한사봉토권으로서 권리의 양도가 있는 경우, 그 후계자라는 말은 권리의 범위를 나타내는 한정문언(words of limitation)으로서 권리를 부여하는 양수인 지정문언(words of purchase)은 아니라는 법리이다. 1725년 이 원칙은 폐지되었다.
dct:subject
dbc:English_property_case_law dbc:1581_in_law dbc:Real_property_law dbc:Common_law_rules dbc:1581_in_England
dbo:wikiPageID
33657291
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1120584030
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Vested_remainder dbr:England dbc:English_property_case_law dbr:Sir_William_Shelley dbr:Trusts dbr:Remainder_(law) dbc:1581_in_law dbr:Rule_against_perpetuities dbr:The_Common_Law_(Holmes) dbr:Fee_simple dbr:Estate_tax dbr:Fee_tail dbr:Lawsuit dbr:En_banc dbr:Estate_in_land dbr:States_of_the_United_States dbr:Lord_Chancellor dbr:Edward_Coke dbr:Future_interests dbc:Real_property_law dbr:John_V._Orth dbr:Occam's_razor dbr:Merger_doctrine_(property_law) dbc:Common_law_rules dbr:Common_law dbc:1581_in_England dbr:Easter_term dbr:English_common_law dbr:Life_tenant dbr:Future_interest dbr:Sir_Thomas_Bromley dbr:King's_Bench dbr:Blackacre dbr:Doctrine_of_worthier_title dbr:Words_of_purchase dbr:Intestacy dbr:Law_of_Property_Act_1925 dbr:Precedent dbr:Real_property dbr:Sion_Monastery
owl:sameAs
yago-res:Rule_in_Shelley's_Case n13:4v7iv freebase:m.055bng wikidata:Q7378950 dbpedia-ko:쉘리사건의_원칙
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:EB1911_poster dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Blockquote dbt:Attribution_needed dbt:Notelist dbt:Reflist dbt:Rp dbt:Efn dbt:Authority_control dbt:Short_description dbt:Property_law
dbo:abstract
The Rule in Shelley's Case is a rule of law that may apply to certain future interests in real property and trusts created in common law jurisdictions. It was applied as early as 1366 in The Provost of Beverly's Case but in its present form is derived from Shelley's Case (1581), in which counsel stated the rule as follows: …when the ancestor by any gift or conveyance takes an estate of freehold, and in the same gift or conveyance an estate is limited either mediately or immediately to his heirs in fee simple or in fee tail; that always in such cases, 'the heirs' are words of limitation of the estate, not words of purchase. The rule was reported by Lord Coke in England in the 17th century as well-settled law. In England, it was abolished by the Law of Property Act 1925. During the twentieth century, it was abolished in most common law jurisdictions, including the majority of the states of the United States. However, in states where the abrogation has been interpreted to apply only to conveyances made after abrogation, the relevance of the rule today varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and in many states remains unclear. 쉘리사건의 원칙(Rule in Shelley's Case)란 자유보유권의 이전이 있으며, 동시에 피이전자의 법정상속인에게 직접 또는 간접으로 단순 봉토권(fee simple) 또는 한사봉토권으로서 권리의 양도가 있는 경우, 그 후계자라는 말은 권리의 범위를 나타내는 한정문언(words of limitation)으로서 권리를 부여하는 양수인 지정문언(words of purchase)은 아니라는 법리이다. 1725년 이 원칙은 폐지되었다.
gold:hypernym
dbr:Rule
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Rule_in_Shelley's_Case?oldid=1120584030&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
9911
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Rule_in_Shelley's_Case