This HTML5 document contains 54 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n15https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Tax_and_spend
rdf:type
dbo:Person
rdfs:label
Tax and spend
rdfs:comment
"Tax and spend" is a term used in politics meaning government policy to increase or collect taxes for the purpose of increasing public spending. The term is commonly used as criticism; some have embraced the label. The 1936 United States Supreme Court case United States v. Butler grappled with the question of the constitutionality of tax and spend policy, with the Court majority concluding that "the power to tax and spend includes the power to relieve a nationwide economic maladjustment by conditional gifts of money."
dcterms:subject
dbc:Tax dbc:Political_slurs
dbo:wikiPageID
13394794
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1116209437
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:New_Deal dbr:Criticism_of_Franklin_D._Roosevelt dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbr:Frank_Hague dbr:The_New_York_Times dbr:United_States_Constitution dbr:Great_Depression dbr:Referendum dbc:Tax dbr:James_Farley dbr:Guy_Vander_Jagt dbr:Public_works dbr:Tax dbr:The_Washington_Times dbr:Democratic_Party_(United_States) dbr:George_H._W._Bush dbr:No_new_taxes dbr:Government_policy dbr:Works_Progress_Administration dbr:Property_tax_in_the_United_States dbr:Harry_Hopkins dbr:Franklin_D._Roosevelt dbr:United_States_v._Butler dbr:Taxing_and_Spending_Clause dbr:National_Republican_Congressional_Committee dbr:Jim_Manley_(strategist) dbc:Political_slurs dbr:Public_spending dbr:State_school dbr:Yonkers,_New_York dbr:Sales_tax_in_the_United_States dbr:Arthur_Krock
owl:sameAs
freebase:m.03c3x66 wikidata:Q7689403 n15:4vEiw freebase:m.09gbqm
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Failed_verification dbt:Short_description dbt:'%22 dbt:Reflist
dbp:date
August 2010
dbp:reason
There is something wrong with this quote. There is no way to verify it via the source given and a Google search turns up nothing but wiki and mirrors of wiki. If Krock really did say "while it fitting completely into ..." then a "" needs to be included.
dbo:abstract
"Tax and spend" is a term used in politics meaning government policy to increase or collect taxes for the purpose of increasing public spending. The term is commonly used as criticism; some have embraced the label. The 1936 United States Supreme Court case United States v. Butler grappled with the question of the constitutionality of tax and spend policy, with the Court majority concluding that "the power to tax and spend includes the power to relieve a nationwide economic maladjustment by conditional gifts of money."
gold:hypernym
dbr:Epithet
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Tax_and_spend?oldid=1116209437&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
8568
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Tax_and_spend