This HTML5 document contains 50 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

Prefix	IRI
dcterms	http://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbo	http://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foaf	http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n7	https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbt	http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfs	http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebase	http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n5	http://dbpedia.org/property/concurrence/
rdf	http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owl	http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-en	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbp	http://dbpedia.org/property/
dbc	http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
prov	http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdh	http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidata	http://www.wikidata.org/entity/
gold	http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
dbr	http://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item

dbr:Arnold_v_Teno

rdf:type

dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase

rdfs:label

Arnold v Teno

rdfs:comment

Arnold v Teno, [1978] 2 SCR 287 is a leading tort case from the Supreme Court of Canada. This decision was part of a trilogy of personal injury cases including Andrews v Grand & Toy Alberta Ltd (1978) and Thornton v Prince George School Board (1978).

dcterms:subject

dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases dbc:1978_in_Canadian_case_law dbc:Canadian_tort_case_law dbc:Ice_cream_vans

dbo:wikiPageID

5227005

dbo:wikiPageRevisionID

999442785

dbo:wikiPageWikiLink

dbr:Ice_cream_truck dbr:Brain_damage dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Canada dbr:List_of_Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases_(Laskin_Court) dbr:Samuel_Sereth_Lieberman dbr:Kuipers_v_Gordon_Riley_Transport dbr:Personal_injury dbc:Canadian_tort_case_law dbc:Ice_cream_vans dbr:Tort dbc:1978_in_Canadian_case_law dbr:Court_of_Appeal_for_Ontario

owl:sameAs

n7:4SMtv wikidata:Q4795332 freebase:m.0d8vsl

dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate

dbt:SCCInfoBox dbt:Canada-law-stub dbt:Lexum-scc2 dbt:Reflist

dbp:joinmajority

Laskin CJ and Judson and Dickson JJ

dbp:citations

[1978] 2 SCR 287

dbp:history

Mixed judgment by the Court of Appeal for Ontario.

dbp:majority

Spence J

dbp:ratio

Various rulings made regarding damages for personal injury.

dbo:abstract

Arnold v Teno, [1978] 2 SCR 287 is a leading tort case from the Supreme Court of Canada. This decision was part of a trilogy of personal injury cases including Andrews v Grand & Toy Alberta Ltd (1978) and Thornton v Prince George School Board (1978).

dbp:caseName

Arnold v Teno

dbp:concurrence

Pigeon J

n5:dissent

de Grandpré J

dbp:decidedDate

1978-01-19

dbp:fullCaseName

Yvonne Teno and Orville Teno J.B. Jackson Limited and Stuart Galloway v. Diane Marie Teno, an Infant by her Next Friend Orville Teno, the Said Orville Teno and Yvonne Teno and Teno in her Capacity as Defendant to a Claim for Indemnity Wallace Arnold and Brian Arnold v. Diane Marie Teno, an Infant by her Next Friend Orville Teno, the Said Orville Teno and Yvonne Teno

dbp:heardDate

0001-06-16

dbp:joinconcurrence

Martland, Ritchie, and Beetz JJ

dbp:ruling

Appeal allowed in part.

dbp:scc

1973

gold:hypernym

dbr:Case

prov:wasDerivedFrom

wikipedia-en:Arnold_v_Teno?oldid=999442785&ns=0

dbo:wikiPageLength

3881

foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf

wikipedia-en:Arnold_v_Teno