This HTML5 document contains 41 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n16https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n15http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Boat_Park_Ltd_v_Hutchinson
rdf:type
dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:label
Boat Park Ltd v Hutchinson
rdfs:comment
Boat Park Ltd v Hutchinson [1999] 2 NZLR 74 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding what evidence is admissible when considering the express terms of a contract. It follows the English case of the Investors Compensation Scheme.
dbp:name
Boat Park Ltd v Hutchinson
foaf:depiction
n15:Coat_of_arms_of_New_Zealand.svg
dcterms:subject
dbc:New_Zealand_contract_case_law dbc:1998_in_New_Zealand_law dbc:Court_of_Appeal_of_New_Zealand_cases dbc:1998_in_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
44069739
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1096867584
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Court_Appeal_of_New_Zealand dbc:Court_of_Appeal_of_New_Zealand_cases dbr:John_Henry_(judge) dbc:1998_in_New_Zealand_law dbr:Ted_Thomas_(judge) dbr:Valuation_(finance) dbr:Investors_Compensation_Scheme dbr:Andrew_Tipping dbc:1998_in_case_law dbc:New_Zealand_contract_case_law
owl:sameAs
freebase:m.0121_hq4 wikidata:Q18326173 n16:mVAk
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Reflist dbt:Orphan dbt:Infobox_court_case dbt:Use_dmy_dates
dbo:thumbnail
n15:Coat_of_arms_of_New_Zealand.svg?width=300
dbp:citations
[1999] 2 NZLR 74
dbp:court
dbr:Court_Appeal_of_New_Zealand
dbp:fullName
Boat Park Limited & Licaka Holdings Limited v Hutchinson & Findlay
dbp:judges
dbr:Ted_Thomas_(judge) dbr:Andrew_Tipping dbr:John_Henry_(judge)
dbo:abstract
Boat Park Ltd v Hutchinson [1999] 2 NZLR 74 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding what evidence is admissible when considering the express terms of a contract. It follows the English case of the Investors Compensation Scheme.
dbp:dateDecided
1998-11-02
gold:hypernym
dbr:Case
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Boat_Park_Ltd_v_Hutchinson?oldid=1096867584&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
2803
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Boat_Park_Ltd_v_Hutchinson