This HTML5 document contains 105 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n17https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
n10https://freemarry.3cdn.net/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n4https://www.leagle.com/decision/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n18http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/20/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
n16https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx%3FFileName=/docketfiles/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/
n21https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/1354856/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Bourke_v._Beshear
rdf:type
dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork dbo:Case wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase owl:Thing
rdfs:label
Bourke v. Beshear
rdfs:comment
The lead cases on same-sex marriage in Kentucky are Bourke v. Beshear, and its companion case Love v. Beshear. In Bourke, a U.S. district court found that the Equal Protection Clause requires Kentucky to recognize valid same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions. In Love, the same court found that this same clause renders Kentucky's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. Both decisions were stayed and consolidated upon appeal to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, which heard oral arguments in both cases on August 6, 2014. On November 6, the Sixth Circuit upheld Kentucky's ban on same-sex marriage.
foaf:name
Bourke v. Beshear
foaf:homepage
n16:14-574.htm
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_same-sex_union_case_law dbc:2014_in_Kentucky dbc:Legal_history_of_Kentucky dbc:LGBT_in_Kentucky dbc:2014_in_LGBT_history dbc:2014_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court
dbo:wikiPageID
41927526
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1117337282
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Jefferson_County,_Kentucky dbr:Jeffrey_Sutton dbr:U.S._Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit dbr:Turner_v._Safley dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Western_District_of_Kentucky dbc:United_States_same-sex_union_case_law dbr:Brief_(law) dbr:Motion_(law) dbr:Kitchen_v._Herbert dbc:2014_in_Kentucky dbr:Constitutional_avoidance dbr:Zablocki_v._Redhail dbr:Stay_of_execution dbr:W.D._Ky. dbr:Jack_Conway_(politician) dbr:Interlocutory_appeal dbr:Equal_Protection_Clause dbc:Legal_history_of_Kentucky dbr:Tanco_v._Haslam dbr:Martha_Craig_Daughtrey dbc:LGBT_in_Kentucky dbr:Bowers_v._Hardwick dbr:Windsor_v._United_States dbr:Lawrence_v._Texas dbr:De_jure dbr:DeBoer_v._Snyder dbr:Obergefell_v._Hodges dbr:Same-sex_marriage_in_the_Sixth_Circuit dbc:2014_in_LGBT_history dbc:2014_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Certiorari dbr:Equal_protection dbr:Same-sex_marriage_in_the_United_States dbr:F._Supp._2d dbr:Birthrate dbr:Same-sex_marriage_in_Kentucky dbr:Same-sex_marriage_in_Ontario dbr:Rational_basis_review dbr:Loving_v._Virginia dbr:Romer_v._Evans dbr:Suspect_class dbr:Heightened_scrutiny dbr:Fundamental_right dbr:Steve_Beshear dbr:Baker_v._Nelson dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:F.3d dbr:John_G._Heyburn_II dbr:LGBT_rights_in_Kentucky dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n4:infdco20140213a85 n4:infdco20140702a18 n4:infco20141106144 n16:14-574.htm n10:a451e58ab634d16ae9_gxm6i6uxk.pdf n18:greg-bourke-michael-deleon_n_7024888.html%3Fir=Parents n21:6th-circuit.pdf
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q17986031 n17:jzDV yago-res:Bourke_v._Beshear freebase:m.011q4lb7
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Use_mdy_dates dbt:Hatnote dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Blockquote
dbp:lawsapplied
dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:prior
25920.0
dbp:arguedate
0001-04-28
dbp:argueyear
2015
dbp:case
172800.0
dbp:fullname
Bourke v. Beshear
dbp:litigants
Bourke v. Beshear
dbp:otherSource
Slip opinion
dbp:otherUrl
n10:a451e58ab634d16ae9_gxm6i6uxk.pdf
dbp:related
Obergefell v. Hodges, DeBoer v. Snyder, Tanco v. Haslam.
dbo:abstract
The lead cases on same-sex marriage in Kentucky are Bourke v. Beshear, and its companion case Love v. Beshear. In Bourke, a U.S. district court found that the Equal Protection Clause requires Kentucky to recognize valid same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions. In Love, the same court found that this same clause renders Kentucky's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. Both decisions were stayed and consolidated upon appeal to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, which heard oral arguments in both cases on August 6, 2014. On November 6, the Sixth Circuit upheld Kentucky's ban on same-sex marriage. On January 16, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court consolidated these cases with three others and agreed to review the case under the name Obergefell v. Hodges. Oral arguments were heard on April 28, 2015, and the Court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in June 2015.
dbp:leagle
n4:infdco20140213a85
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Bourke_v._Beshear?oldid=1117337282&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
21889
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Bourke_v._Beshear