This HTML5 document contains 68 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n18https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n15http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n14http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
n19https://swarb.co.uk/boys-v-chaplin-hl-1969/
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Boys_v_Chaplin
rdf:type
yago:WikicatLordWilberforceCases yago:Happening107283608 yago:Case107308889 dbo:MilitaryConflict yago:Event100029378 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:label
Boys v Chaplin
rdfs:comment
Boys v Chaplin [1971] AC 356 is a leading conflict of laws case decided by the House of Lords.
dbp:name
Boys v Chaplin
foaf:depiction
n15:Royal_Coat_of_Arms_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg
dcterms:subject
dbc:House_of_Lords_cases dbc:1969_in_case_law dbc:Lord_Wilberforce_cases dbc:1969_in_British_law dbc:Malta–United_Kingdom_relations dbc:English_conflict_of_laws_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
9200697
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1071526636
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Phillips_v_Eyre dbc:1969_in_case_law dbr:Lex_fori dbc:Lord_Wilberforce_cases dbr:Judicial_functions_of_the_House_of_Lords dbr:Dicey_Morris_&_Collins dbc:1969_in_British_law dbr:Choice_of_law dbr:Lord_Upjohn dbr:Lord_Denning dbr:Kenneth_Diplock,_Baron_Diplock dbc:Malta–United_Kingdom_relations dbc:English_conflict_of_laws_case_law dbr:Lex_loci_delicti dbr:Red_Sea_Insurance_Co_Ltd_v_Bouygues_SA dbr:Conflict_of_laws dbr:Red_Sea_Insurance_v_Bouygues_SA dbr:Double_actionability dbc:House_of_Lords_cases dbr:List_of_House_of_Lords_cases dbr:House_of_Lords dbr:Tort
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n14:147377958301200402%3FjournalCode=clwa n19:
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q4952733 yago-res:Boys_v_Chaplin freebase:m.0280182 n18:4b4xx
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Nofootnotes dbt:Infobox_court_case dbt:Cite_bailii dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Use_British_English
dbo:thumbnail
n15:Royal_Coat_of_Arms_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg?width=300
dbp:citations
[1969] 2 All ER 1085 [1971] AC 356
dbp:court
dbr:Judicial_functions_of_the_House_of_Lords
dbp:fullName
David Boys v Richard Chaplin
dbp:judges
Lord Denning, Lord Upjohn, and Kenneth Diplock, Baron Diplock
dbp:keywords
choice of law in tort dbr:Double_actionability dbr:Conflict_of_laws
dbo:abstract
Boys v Chaplin [1971] AC 356 is a leading conflict of laws case decided by the House of Lords.
gold:hypernym
dbr:Conflict
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Boys_v_Chaplin?oldid=1071526636&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
4164
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Boys_v_Chaplin