This HTML5 document contains 154 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
n26https://scholar.google.com/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
n20http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n28https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/104961/briggs-v-elliott/
n11https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
n14https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/98/529/1899720/
n25http://brownvboard.org/content/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n23https://web.archive.org/web/20070927222427/http:/www.usca.edu/aasc/
n7https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/132/776/1454854/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n22https://web.archive.org/web/20080518134226/http:/www.teachingushistory.org/tTrove/
n32https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/342/
n15https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/342/350/
n19http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n6https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/342/
dbpedia-ithttp://it.dbpedia.org/resource/
n21http://americanarchive.org/catalog/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
n24http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep342/usrep342350/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbpedia-nlhttp://nl.dbpedia.org/resource/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Briggs_v._Elliott
rdf:type
yago:Case107308889 dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork yago:Concept105835747 yago:WikicatHumanRights yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Abstraction105854150 yago:Cognition100023271 dbo:Case yago:Happening107283608 yago:Right105174653 owl:Thing yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 wikidata:Q2334719 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:HumanRight105176846 yago:Idea105833840 yago:Content105809192 yago:Event100029378 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases
rdfs:label
Briggs contro Elliott Briggs v. Elliott Briggs v. Elliott
rdfs:comment
Il caso Briggs contro Elliott, del 1952, è un appello della Corte Distrettuale degli Stati Uniti per il distretto orientale della Carolina del Sud che si pose contro la segregazione nelle scuole di Summerton, nella Carolina del Sud. Fu il primo dei cinque casi riuniti nel processo Brown v. Board of Education del 1954, il famoso caso in cui la Corte Suprema degli Stati Uniti dichiarò illegale la segregazione razziale nelle scuole pubbliche, poiché in disaccordo con il quattordicesimo emendamento per la tutela dei diritti e dell'uguaglianza. A seguito della decisione sul caso Brown, la corte distrettuale sentenziò l'incostituzionalità della segregazione nelle scuole e varò leggi in merito per rendere obbligatoria l'integrazione nelle scuole statali. Briggs v. Elliott was een Amerikaanse rechtszaak in de jaren '50, die samen met drie andere gecombineerd werd als Brown v. Board of Education en leidde tot de afschaffing van rassenscheiding op openbare scholen. Briggs v. Elliott kwam oorspronkelijk uit Summerton in South Carolina. Briggs v. Elliott, 342 U.S. 350 (1952), on appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of South Carolina, challenged school segregation in Summerton, South Carolina. It was the first of the five cases combined into Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the famous case in which the U.S. Supreme Court declared racial segregation in public schools to be unconstitutional by violating the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. Following the Brown decision, the district court issued a decree that struck down the school segregation law in South Carolina as unconstitutional and required the state's schools to integrate. Harry and Eliza Briggs, Reverend Joseph A. DeLaine, and Levi Pearson were awarded Congressional Gold Medals posthumously in 2003.
foaf:name
Harry Briggs Jr. et al. v. R.W. Elliott, chairman, et al.
foaf:depiction
n19:Educational_separation_in_the_US_prior_to_Brown_Map.svg n19:2003_Brown_et_al._v._the_Board_of_Education_of_Topeka_et_al._Congressional_Gold_Medal.jpg n19:Letter,_1947_October_1,_Levi_Pearson_to_Vander_Stukes.jpg
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Vinson_Court dbc:African-American_history_between_emancipation_and_the_civil_rights_movement dbc:Clarendon_County,_South_Carolina dbc:Public_education_in_South_Carolina dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:Civil_rights_movement_case_law dbc:United_States_school_desegregation_case_law dbc:African-American_history_of_South_Carolina dbc:1952_in_United_States_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
635664
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1120668003
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:John_W._Davis dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_342 dbr:United_States_Code dbr:Buffalo,_New_York dbr:Injunction dbr:Thurgood_Marshall dbr:Joseph_DeLaine dbr:List_of_former_United_States_district_courts dbr:Clarendon_County,_South_Carolina dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Vinson_Court dbr:Code_of_Laws_of_South_Carolina dbr:Joseph_A._DeLaine dbr:Modjeska_Monteith_Simkins dbr:Constitution_of_South_Carolina dbr:Mandamus dbr:Judgment_(law) n20:Educational_separation_in_the_US_prior_to_Brown_Map.svg dbr:NAACP dbc:African-American_history_between_emancipation_and_the_civil_rights_movement n20:2003_Brown_et_al._v._the_Board_of_Education_of_Topeka_et_al._Congressional_Gold_Medal.jpg dbr:F._Supp. dbr:George_Bell_Timmerman_Jr. dbc:Clarendon_County,_South_Carolina dbr:Congressional_Gold_Medal dbr:Summerton,_South_Carolina dbr:Summerton_High_School dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:African_American dbr:Kenneth_and_Mamie_Clark dbr:American_Archive_of_Public_Broadcasting dbr:Equal_Protection_Clause dbr:Spottswood_William_Robinson_III dbc:Public_education_in_South_Carolina dbc:Civil_rights_movement_case_law dbr:African-Americans dbr:U.S._Supreme_Court dbr:John_J._Parker dbr:Separate_but_equal dbr:Julius_Waties_Waring dbr:Race_(classification_of_human_beings) dbc:United_States_school_desegregation_case_law n20:Letter,_1947_October_1,_Levi_Pearson_to_Vander_Stukes.jpg dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Brown_v._Board_of_Education dbc:African-American_history_of_South_Carolina dbr:Order_of_the_Palmetto dbr:Drive-by_shooting dbc:1952_in_United_States_case_law dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Eastern_District_of_South_Carolina dbr:Robert_L._Carter dbr:Eyes_on_the_Prize
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n6:350 n7: n14: n15: n21:cpb-aacip-151-r785h7cs9k n21:cpb-aacip-151-w08w951k14 n22:briggsvelliott.htm n23:BriggsvElliot.htm n24:usrep342350.pdf n25:opinion-briggs-supp920 n28: n26:scholar_case%3Fcase=16693048563837275531 n32:350.html
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q4967282 n11:4bJw9 dbpedia-nl:Briggs_v._Elliott yago-res:Briggs_v._Elliott freebase:m.02z432 dbpedia-it:Briggs_contro_Elliott
dbp:subsequent
0001-03-13
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Citation_needed dbt:US14thAmendment dbt:Blockquote dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:ISBN dbt:Civil_rights_movement dbt:Ussc dbt:Caselaw_source
dbo:thumbnail
n19:Educational_separation_in_the_US_prior_to_Brown_Map.svg?width=300
dbp:dissent
Black
dbp:joindissent
Douglas
dbp:lawsapplied
28
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
0001-06-23
dbp:uspage
350
dbp:usvol
342
dbp:author
0001-10-01
dbp:case
Briggs v. Elliott,
dbp:courtlistener
n28:
dbp:decidedate
0001-01-28
dbp:decideyear
1952
dbp:findlaw
n32:350.html
dbp:fullname
Harry Briggs Jr. et al. v. R.W. Elliott, chairman, et al.
dbp:holding
In order that the Supreme Court may have the benefit of the views of the district court upon the additional facts brought out in the appellees report on the implementation of district court's mandate to equalize segregated South Carolina schools, and that the district court may have the opportunity to take whatever action it may deem appropriate in light of that report, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
dbp:justia
n15:
dbp:litigants
Briggs v. Elliott
dbp:text
"A Petition on behalf of my children and all other school children in School District #26, Clarendon County, South Carolina, was mailed to you, since that date I have had no communication from you with regard to this petition nor has any efforts been made to furnish bus transportation to Negroes in this School District. Please advise me if efforts are being made to furnish school bus transportation."
dbp:loc
n24:usrep342350.pdf
dbo:abstract
Il caso Briggs contro Elliott, del 1952, è un appello della Corte Distrettuale degli Stati Uniti per il distretto orientale della Carolina del Sud che si pose contro la segregazione nelle scuole di Summerton, nella Carolina del Sud. Fu il primo dei cinque casi riuniti nel processo Brown v. Board of Education del 1954, il famoso caso in cui la Corte Suprema degli Stati Uniti dichiarò illegale la segregazione razziale nelle scuole pubbliche, poiché in disaccordo con il quattordicesimo emendamento per la tutela dei diritti e dell'uguaglianza. A seguito della decisione sul caso Brown, la corte distrettuale sentenziò l'incostituzionalità della segregazione nelle scuole e varò leggi in merito per rendere obbligatoria l'integrazione nelle scuole statali. Briggs v. Elliott, 342 U.S. 350 (1952), on appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of South Carolina, challenged school segregation in Summerton, South Carolina. It was the first of the five cases combined into Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the famous case in which the U.S. Supreme Court declared racial segregation in public schools to be unconstitutional by violating the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. Following the Brown decision, the district court issued a decree that struck down the school segregation law in South Carolina as unconstitutional and required the state's schools to integrate. Harry and Eliza Briggs, Reverend Joseph A. DeLaine, and Levi Pearson were awarded Congressional Gold Medals posthumously in 2003. Briggs v. Elliott was een Amerikaanse rechtszaak in de jaren '50, die samen met drie andere gecombineerd werd als Brown v. Board of Education en leidde tot de afschaffing van rassenscheiding op openbare scholen. Briggs v. Elliott kwam oorspronkelijk uit Summerton in South Carolina. In 1948 diende , een advocaat van de NAACP, een klacht in bij een districtsrechtbank om ervoor te zorgen dat zwarte kinderen, die altijd naar school moesten lopen, voorzien werden van een bus. De zaak werd ingediend in naam van een lokale kleurling, Levi Pearson, wiens kinderen meer dan tien kilometer moesten lopen voordat ze bij hun school waren. De rechter wees de eis af, omdat Pearsons boerderij dichter bij een school zou liggen dan diegene waar zijn kinderen opdat moment werden onderwezen. Uit wraak weigerde de blanke bevolking van Summerton nog zijn producten te kopen. De NAACP stemde in 1949 toe om een petitie te sponsoren die gelijke rechten voor iedereen eiste. De petitie werd geschreven door de burgerrechten-activiste en de dominee Joseph DeLaine, en ondertekend door zo'n twintig zwarte burgers. Minstens vijf van hen werden ontslagen, en een aantal moest werk zoeken in een andere staat. In mei 1951 werd de zaak gehoord door de districtsrechtbank; twee van de rechters stelden de aanklagers in het ongelijk. De derde, , schreef dat "uit rassenscheiding sowieso ongelijkheid voortvloeit". Hoewel de rechtbank Summerton wel opdroeg de leerlingen van gelijke faciliteiten te voorzien, bleven de gescheiden scholen legaal. De NAACP ging in hoger beroep bij het Federale Gerechtshof. Daar werd de zaak gecombineerd met Brown v. Board of Education uit Kansas, Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County (Virginia) en (Delaware). Hoewel Briggs de eerste rechtszaak was die aan het Hooggerechtshof werd voorgelegd, koos men ervoor om de zaak te noemen naar de aanklacht uit Kansas, zodat men segregatie niet zou zien als een typisch zuiderse zaak. Op 17 mei 1954 beslisten de negen rechters van het hooggerechtshof unaniem dat rassenscheiding op openbare scholen een schending vormde van de gelijkheidsclausule van het veertiende amendement van de Amerikaanse Grondwet. Hoewel het een overwinning voor de NAACP was, liep het geheel uit op een drama voor lokale betrokkenen. Joseph DeLaines kerk werd in brand gestoken, en hijzelf overleefd ternauwernood een moordpoging; in 1955 verhuisde hij naar New York. Harry en Eliza Briggs, in wier naam de eis aan de rechtbank werd voorgelegd, raakten werkloos en moesten met hun kinderen noodgedwongen naar een noordelijke staat verhuizen.
dbp:cornell
n6:350
dbp:googlescholar
n26:scholar_case%3Fcase=16693048563837275531
dbp:percuriam
Yes
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Briggs_v._Elliott?oldid=1120668003&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
22368
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Briggs_v._Elliott