This HTML5 document contains 90 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n11https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/499/621/
n9https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n10https://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1990/
n20https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/499/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n17https://www.oyez.org/cases/1990/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/
n18http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep499/usrep499621/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:California_v._Hodari_D.
rdf:type
dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork dbo:Case owl:Thing wikidata:Q2334719
rdfs:label
California v. Hodari D.
rdfs:comment
California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case where the Court held that a fleeing suspect is not "seized" under the terms of the Fourth Amendment unless the pursuing officers apply physical force to the suspect or the suspect submits to officers' demands to halt. Consequently, evidence that is discarded by a fleeing suspect prior to the point in time at which they are seized is not subject to the Fourth Amendment's exclusionary rule.
foaf:name
California v. Hodari D.
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court dbc:1991_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
dbo:wikiPageID
47324820
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1122438524
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_499 dbr:Associate_Justice_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:California_Court_of_Appeal dbr:California_Supreme_Court dbr:Common_law dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Antonin_Scalia dbr:Fruit_of_the_poisonous_tree dbc:1991_in_United_States_case_law dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Rehnquist_Court dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court dbr:New_England_Law_Review dbr:Commonwealth_v._Matos dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Dissenting_opinion dbr:Suppression_of_evidence dbr:Appeal dbr:John_Paul_Stevens dbr:Juvenile_court dbr:Motion_(law) dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbr:Oakland,_California dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Fourth_Amendment_of_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Petition_for_review dbr:Lists_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_volume dbr:Torres_v._Madrid dbr:Crack_cocaine dbr:Exclusionary_rule dbr:Northern_Illinois_University_Law_Review dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n10:1990_89_1632 n17:89-1632 n18:usrep499621.pdf n11: n20:621.html
owl:sameAs
n9:pjom wikidata:Q19019832 yago-res:California_v._Hodari_D.
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Refn dbt:US4thAmendment dbt:Ussc dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Bots dbt:Caselaw_source
dbp:dissent
Stevens
dbp:docket
89
dbp:joindissent
Marshall
dbp:joinmajority
Rehnquist, White, Blackmun, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter
dbp:lawsapplied
dbr:Fourth_Amendment_of_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:oralargument
n10:1990_89_1632
dbp:oyez
n17:89-1632
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
Certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District
dbp:uspage
621
dbp:usvol
499
dbp:arguedate
0001-01-14
dbp:argueyear
1991
dbp:case
California v. Hodari D.,
dbp:decidedate
0001-04-23
dbp:decideyear
1991
dbp:findlaw
n20:621.html
dbp:fullname
California v. Hodari D.
dbp:holding
During police pursuits, a fleeing suspect is not seized unless pursuing officers apply physical force to the suspect or the suspect submits to shows of authority
dbp:justia
n11:
dbp:litigants
California v. Hodari D.
dbp:majority
Scalia
dbp:loc
n18:usrep499621.pdf
dbo:abstract
California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case where the Court held that a fleeing suspect is not "seized" under the terms of the Fourth Amendment unless the pursuing officers apply physical force to the suspect or the suspect submits to officers' demands to halt. Consequently, evidence that is discarded by a fleeing suspect prior to the point in time at which they are seized is not subject to the Fourth Amendment's exclusionary rule.
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:California_v._Hodari_D.?oldid=1122438524&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
8303
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:California_v._Hodari_D.