This HTML5 document contains 95 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n18http://library2.usask.ca/native/cnlc/vol07/
n15https://web.archive.org/web/20060720030000/http:/www.collectionscanada.ca/women/
n9https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
n12http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-12.3/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Canada_(AG)_v_Lavell
rdf:type
dbo:Place
rdfs:label
Canada (AG) v Lavell
rdfs:comment
Canada (AG) v Lavell, [1974] S.C.R. 1349, was a landmark 5–4 Supreme Court of Canada decision holding that Section 12(1)(b) of the Indian Act did not violate the respondents' right to "equality before the law" under Section 1 (b) of the Canadian Bill of Rights. The two respondents, Lavell and Bédard, had alleged that the impugned section was discriminatory under the Canadian Bill of Rights by virtue of the fact that it deprived Indian women of their status for marrying a non-Indian, but not Indian men.
dcterms:subject
dbc:Canadian_federal_government_litigation dbc:Minority_rights_case_law dbc:1973_in_Canadian_case_law dbc:Gender_discrimination_lawsuits dbc:Canadian_Aboriginal_case_law dbc:Canadian_civil_rights_case_law dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases
dbo:wikiPageID
3575973
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1124188932
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:A._V._Dicey dbr:Section_15_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms dbr:Statement_of_claim dbr:Concurring_opinion dbr:Judicial_Committee_of_the_Privy_Council dbr:Curr_v._The_Queen dbr:Indian_Health_Transfer_Policy_(Canada) dbr:Indian_Register dbr:Section_Thirty-five_of_the_Constitution_Act,_1982 dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Canada dbr:Canadian_Bill_of_Rights dbc:Minority_rights_case_law dbr:Rule_of_law dbr:Judge dbr:Numbered_Treaties dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Ontario dbc:Canadian_federal_government_litigation dbr:Section_Fifteen_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms dbr:Bora_Laskin dbc:Gender_discrimination_lawsuits dbr:Injunction dbc:Canadian_Aboriginal_case_law dbr:Roland_Ritchie dbc:1973_in_Canadian_case_law dbr:The_Canadian_Crown_and_First_Nations,_Inuit_and_Métis dbr:R_v_Drybones dbr:Jeannette_Vivian_Corbiere_Lavell dbr:R._v._Drybones dbr:Dissenting_opinion dbr:Ryerson_Polytechnical_Institute dbr:Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms dbr:Indian_and_Northern_Affairs_Canada dbc:Canadian_civil_rights_case_law dbr:List_of_gender_equality_lawsuits dbr:Federal_Court_of_Appeal dbr:Louis-Philippe_Pigeon dbr:Constitution_Act,_1867 dbr:Discrimination dbr:Parliament_of_Canada dbr:Plurality_opinion dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases dbr:Common_law dbr:Wiikwemkoong_First_Nation dbr:Indian_Act
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n12:index.html n15:002026-302-e.html n18:009.html n18:222.html n18:230.html
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q4818631 n9:4To8r freebase:m.09mlzd yago-res:Canada_(AG)_v_Lavell
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Canadian_Indigenous_case_law dbt:Clarify dbt:Reflist dbt:SCCInfoBox dbt:Lexum-scc2
dbp:dissent
Abbott J. Laskin J.
dbp:joindissent
Hall and Spence JJ.
dbp:lawsapplied
Canadian BilI of Rights, R.S.C. 1970, App. III; Indian Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. I-6.
dbp:citations
38
dbp:date
October 2018
dbp:history
Judgment for Bédard in the Supreme Court of Ontario Judgment for Lavell in the Federal Court of Appeal
dbp:ratio
Section 12 of the Indian Act does not violate the right to equality before the law and the protection of the law, as guaranteed under Section 1 of the Canadian Bill of Rights, and is therefore not inoperative.
dbp:reason
There are three quotemarks here, breaking the quotation.
dbo:abstract
Canada (AG) v Lavell, [1974] S.C.R. 1349, was a landmark 5–4 Supreme Court of Canada decision holding that Section 12(1)(b) of the Indian Act did not violate the respondents' right to "equality before the law" under Section 1 (b) of the Canadian Bill of Rights. The two respondents, Lavell and Bédard, had alleged that the impugned section was discriminatory under the Canadian Bill of Rights by virtue of the fact that it deprived Indian women of their status for marrying a non-Indian, but not Indian men. The Supreme Court's decision proved very controversial, later influencing the wording of Section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms during the drafting process.
dbp:caseName
Canada v Lavell
dbp:concurrence
Pigeon J.
dbp:decidedDate
1973-08-27
dbp:fullCaseName
The Attorney General of Canada v. Jeannette Vivian Corbiere Lavell; Richard Isaac, Leonard Staats, Clarence Jamieson, Rena Hill, Norman Lickers, William White, Nina Burnham, John Capton, Howard Lickers, Clifford Lickers, Mitchell Sandy, Ronald Monture, Gordon Hill, Sydney Henhawk, Ross Powless, Victor Porter, Frank Monture, Renson Jamieson and Vincent Sandy v. Yvonne Bédard
dbp:heardDate
0001-02-22
dbp:joinplurality
Fauteux C.J., and Martland and Judson JJ.
dbp:plurality
Ritchie J.
dbp:ruling
Appeals allowed.
dbp:scc
1970
gold:hypernym
dbr:Court
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Canada_(AG)_v_Lavell?oldid=1124188932&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
38867
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Canada_(AG)_v_Lavell