This HTML5 document contains 60 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n11http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep011/usrep011382/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n10https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n20https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/11/382/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
n14https://openjurist.org/11/us/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Cargo_of_the_Brig_Aurora_v._United_States
rdf:type
yago:Happening107283608 dbo:Case yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 wikidata:Q2334719 owl:Thing dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:label
Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States
rdfs:comment
Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States, 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 382 (1813), involved a forfeiture statute that Congress passed with a condition. The 1809 trade prohibition against Great Britain was to be reinstated in 1810 unless the President declared, by proclamation, that Great Britain was no longer violating the neutrality of the United States. The defendant argued unsuccessfully that such a conditional law unconstitutionally delegated congressional legislative authority to the President. The Court unequivocally upheld "reviving the act...either expressly or conditionally, as their judgment should direct."
foaf:name
Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Marshall_Court dbc:1813_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_nondelegation_doctrine_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
26595784
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1067751435
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:L._Ed. dbr:William_Cranch dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Marshall_Court dbc:United_States_nondelegation_doctrine_case_law dbc:1813_in_United_States_case_law dbr:United_States_Congress
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n11:usrep011382.pdf n14:382 n20:
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q5039286 n10:4fczT freebase:m.0bh97sv yago-res:Cargo_of_the_Brig_Aurora_v._United_States
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Reflist dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Ussc dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case
dbp:joinmajority
unanimous
dbp:lawsapplied
dbr:Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:parallelcitations
7
dbp:uspage
382
dbp:usvol
11
dbp:case
Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States,
dbp:decideyear
1813
dbp:fullname
Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States
dbp:holding
Congress may revive a law by conditioning its revival on certain inaction by the President. Such is not an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority.
dbp:justia
n20:
dbp:litigants
Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States
dbp:majority
Johnson
dbp:loc
n11:usrep011382.pdf
dbo:abstract
Cargo of the Brig Aurora v. United States, 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 382 (1813), involved a forfeiture statute that Congress passed with a condition. The 1809 trade prohibition against Great Britain was to be reinstated in 1810 unless the President declared, by proclamation, that Great Britain was no longer violating the neutrality of the United States. The defendant argued unsuccessfully that such a conditional law unconstitutionally delegated congressional legislative authority to the President. The Court unequivocally upheld "reviving the act...either expressly or conditionally, as their judgment should direct."
dbp:openjurist
n14:382
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Cargo_of_the_Brig_Aurora_v._United_States?oldid=1067751435&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
2160
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Cargo_of_the_Brig_Aurora_v._United_States