This HTML5 document contains 67 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n21https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
n4http://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n13http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/casdce/3:2008cv01987/282314/283/
n7http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/08/08/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n20https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2017/09/15/
n9http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n15http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:CollegeSource,_Inc._v._AcademyOne,_Inc.
rdfs:label
CollegeSource, Inc. v. AcademyOne, Inc.
rdfs:comment
CollegeSource, Inc. v. AcademyOne, Inc., 653 F.3d 1066 (9th Cir. 2011), was a United States legal case in which CollegeSource sued AcademyOne for a number of claims including the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). The case was dismissed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on September 24, 2015 clearing AcademyOne of any wrongdoing. CollegeSource appealed the 9th Circuit District Court's dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which unanimously affirmed the lower Court's decision on September 15, 2017.
foaf:depiction
n9:Seal_of_the_United_States_Courts,_Ninth_Judicial_Circuit.svg
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit_cases
dbo:wikiPageID
45424761
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1088872606
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Typography dbr:William_A._Fletcher dbr:Pennsylvania dbr:Southern_District_of_California dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit dbr:Prima_facie dbr:Cease-and-desist_letter dbr:California dbr:Barbara_M._Lynn dbr:Trade_fair dbr:Summary_judgement dbr:Burger_King_Corp._v._Rudzewicz dbr:Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act dbr:College_transfer dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit_cases dbr:Google_AdWords dbr:Copyright dbr:Digital_collection dbr:Gonzalo_P._Curiel dbr:Direct_competitors dbr:J._McIntyre_Machinery,_Ltd._v._Nicastro dbr:Database dbr:San_Diego dbr:Remand_(court_procedure) dbr:Misappropriation dbr:Intellectual_property dbr:Kim_McLane_Wardlaw dbr:Economic_loss dbr:Personal_jurisdiction dbr:Digitization
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n4:124167np.pdf n7:09-56528.pdf%7Cquote= n13: n15:viewcontent.cgi%3Farticle=1167&context=historical n20:15-56994.pdf%7Cquote=
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q19879507 freebase:m.012zckb2 n21:tzk2
dbp:university
University of California, Berkeley
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Cite_court dbt:Reflist dbt:Primary_sources dbt:Infobox_court_case dbt:More_citations_needed dbt:WAP_assignment dbt:Cleanup dbt:Short_description dbt:Multiple_issues
dbo:thumbnail
n9:Seal_of_the_United_States_Courts,_Ninth_Judicial_Circuit.svg?width=300
dbp:arguedate
2010-10-08
dbp:citations
25920.0
dbp:course
Education_Program:University_of_California,_Berkeley/Cyberlaw_
dbp:court
dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit
dbp:fullName
CollegeSource, Inc. v. AcademyOne, Inc.
dbp:judges
Kim McLane Wardlaw, William A. Fletcher, and Barbara M. Lynn
dbp:project
WikiProject Cyberlaw
dbp:term
2015
dbo:abstract
CollegeSource, Inc. v. AcademyOne, Inc., 653 F.3d 1066 (9th Cir. 2011), was a United States legal case in which CollegeSource sued AcademyOne for a number of claims including the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). The case was dismissed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on September 24, 2015 clearing AcademyOne of any wrongdoing. CollegeSource appealed the 9th Circuit District Court's dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which unanimously affirmed the lower Court's decision on September 15, 2017. Prior to summary judgement and its affirmation, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that AcademyOne was subject to specific personal jurisdiction in California, but not general personal jurisdiction. The court then remanded the case to the District Court for the Southern District of California for further proceedings.
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:CollegeSource,_Inc._v._AcademyOne,_Inc.?oldid=1088872606&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
12051
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:CollegeSource,_Inc._v._AcademyOne,_Inc.