This HTML5 document contains 50 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n14https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n12http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/1982/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbpedia-frhttp://fr.dbpedia.org/resource/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Descôteaux_v_Mierzwinski
rdf:type
dbo:Place
rdfs:label
Descôteaux c. Mierzwinski Descôteaux v Mierzwinski
rdfs:comment
Descôteaux c. Mierzwinski est un arrêt de principe de la Cour suprême du Canada sur le secret professionnel de l'avocat. La cour a réaffirmé l'opinion contenue dans Solosky c. La Reine que ce privilège est un droit substantiel qui existe même en dehors d'une instance. Descôteaux v Mierzwinski, [1982] 1 SCR 860 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on solicitor-client privilege. The court reaffirmed the opinion in R. v. Solosky that privilege was a substantive right that even existed outside of a proceeding.
dcterms:subject
dbc:Legal_professional_privilege dbc:1982_in_Canadian_case_law dbc:Evidentiary_privilege_case_law dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases dbc:Canadian_evidence_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
5413150
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1118267000
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Quebec_Court_of_Appeal dbc:1982_in_Canadian_case_law dbc:Evidentiary_privilege_case_law dbr:Quebec_Superior_Court dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases dbr:R._v._Solosky dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Canada dbr:Solicitor-client_privilege dbc:Canadian_evidence_case_law dbc:Legal_professional_privilege dbr:Antonio_Lamer
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n12:1982scc10011.html
owl:sameAs
dbpedia-fr:Descôteaux_c._Mierzwinski freebase:m.0dkrnj n14:4j98v wikidata:Q5263820
dbp:unanimous
Lamer J
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Canada-law-stub dbt:Infobox_SCC dbt:Single_source dbt:Italic_title dbt:Quote
dbp:docket
16113
dbp:citations
[1982] 1 SCR 860
dbp:history
APPEAL from Descôteaux v Mierzwinski, [1980] 16 CR 188 , affirming Descôteaux v Mierzwinski, [1978] Que SC 792
dbo:abstract
Descôteaux v Mierzwinski, [1982] 1 SCR 860 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on solicitor-client privilege. The court reaffirmed the opinion in R. v. Solosky that privilege was a substantive right that even existed outside of a proceeding. Descôteaux c. Mierzwinski est un arrêt de principe de la Cour suprême du Canada sur le secret professionnel de l'avocat. La cour a réaffirmé l'opinion contenue dans Solosky c. La Reine que ce privilège est un droit substantiel qui existe même en dehors d'une instance.
dbp:caseName
Descôteaux et al v Mierzwinski
dbp:decidedDate
1982-06-23
dbp:fullCaseName
Simon Descôteaux and Centre communautaire juridique de Montréal v Alexandre Mierzwinski
dbp:heardDate
0001-10-28
dbp:notparticipating
Laskin CJ and McIntyre J
dbp:ruling
Appeal dismissed
dbp:scc
1980
gold:hypernym
dbr:Court
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Descôteaux_v_Mierzwinski?oldid=1118267000&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
3794
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Descôteaux_v_Mierzwinski