This HTML5 document contains 92 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n7https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n14http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Florence_v._Shurtleff
rdf:type
yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
rdfs:label
Florence v. Shurtleff
rdfs:comment
Florence v. Shurtleff, Civil No. 2:05CV000485 (D. Utah 2012), was a case in which the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah issued an order stating that individuals could not be prosecuted for posting adult content that was constitutionally protected on general access websites, nor could they be civilly liable for failing to prevent access to adult content, so long as the material is identifiable by filtering software. The order was the result of a 2005 lawsuit, The King's English v. Shurtleff, brought by Utah bookstores, artists, Internet Service Providers and the other organizations challenging the constitutionality of certain portions of a Utah law intended to protect minors from adult content.
foaf:depiction
n14:District-Utah.png
dcterms:subject
dbc:Internet_censorship dbc:United_States_privacy_case_law dbc:2012_in_Utah dbc:Censorship_in_the_United_States dbc:Content-control_software dbc:United_States_copyright_case_law dbc:American_Civil_Liberties_Union_litigation dbc:Self-censorship dbc:2012_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_First_Amendment_case_law dbc:United_States_communications_regulation_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
41913121
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1121701241
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbc:United_States_First_Amendment_case_law dbr:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Strict_scrutiny dbr:Center_for_Democracy_&_Technology_v._Pappert dbr:United_States_v._American_Library_Association dbr:House_Bill_260 dbr:Censorship dbr:Utah_Harmful_to_Minors_Act dbr:Children's_Internet_Protection_Act dbr:Preliminary_injunction dbr:Dee_Benson dbr:Sexual_predator dbc:United_States_privacy_case_law dbr:U.S._District_Court_for_the_District_of_Utah dbr:Legal_standing dbr:Standing_(law) dbc:Internet_censorship dbc:2012_in_Utah dbr:First_Amendment dbr:Reno_v._American_Civil_Liberties_Union dbr:Jon_Huntsman,_Jr. dbr:Nitke_v._Gonzales dbr:First_amendment dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbc:Censorship_in_the_United_States dbr:Ginsberg_v._New_York dbr:Motion_for_summary_judgment dbc:Content-control_software dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Eastern_District_of_Pennsylvania dbr:Filtering_software dbr:ACLU dbr:Sable_Communications_of_California_v._FCC dbr:Declaratory_judgment dbc:United_States_copyright_case_law dbc:Self-censorship dbr:Motion_to_dismiss dbr:Utah_Attorney_General dbc:American_Civil_Liberties_Union_litigation dbr:Dart_v._Craigslist,_Inc. dbr:Commerce_Clause dbr:Free_speech dbr:Internet_service_providers dbc:United_States_communications_regulation_case_law dbr:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbc:2012_in_United_States_case_law
owl:sameAs
n7:f5kx wikidata:Q17006038 freebase:m.0_xcfzy
dbp:university
University of California, Berkeley
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Italic_title dbt:Infobox_U.S._Courts_of_Appeals_case dbt:Reflist dbt:WAP_assignment
dbo:thumbnail
n14:District-Utah.png?width=300
dbp:lawsapplied
dbr:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:arguedate
2012-04-12
dbp:course
Education_Program:University_of_California,_Berkeley/Cyberlaw_
dbp:court
dbr:U.S._District_Court_for_the_District_of_Utah
dbp:courtseal
District-Utah.png
dbp:decidedate
2012-05-15
dbp:holding
Individuals cannot be prosecuted for posting constitutionally protected content for adults on general-access websites. They are not required by the Utah law to label such content.
dbp:imagesize
220
dbp:judges
dbr:Dee_Benson
dbp:litigants
Florence v. Shurtleff
dbp:project
WikiProject Cyberlaw
dbp:term
2014
dbo:abstract
Florence v. Shurtleff, Civil No. 2:05CV000485 (D. Utah 2012), was a case in which the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah issued an order stating that individuals could not be prosecuted for posting adult content that was constitutionally protected on general access websites, nor could they be civilly liable for failing to prevent access to adult content, so long as the material is identifiable by filtering software. The order was the result of a 2005 lawsuit, The King's English v. Shurtleff, brought by Utah bookstores, artists, Internet Service Providers and the other organizations challenging the constitutionality of certain portions of a Utah law intended to protect minors from adult content.
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Florence_v._Shurtleff?oldid=1121701241&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
17553
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Florence_v._Shurtleff