This HTML5 document contains 60 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n13https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Frey_v_Fedoruk
rdf:type
yago:Group100031264 yago:Law108441203 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Collection107951464 yago:WikicatSexLaws
rdfs:label
Frey v Fedoruk
rdfs:comment
Frey v Fedoruk [1950] S.C.R. 517 is a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on the definition of a breach of the peace and whether being a "peeping tom" is a crime. The Court found that actions do not necessarily breach the peace just because they cause violent reactions. Due to this finding, courts would have less say in determining what is criminal as a breach of the peace, and the Parliament of Canada would have more.
dcterms:subject
dbc:1950_in_Canadian_case_law dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases dbc:Sex_laws
dbo:wikiPageID
6674449
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1007533961
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:John_Robert_Cartwright dbr:Court_of_Appeal_for_British_Columbia dbr:Parliament_of_Canada dbr:Breach_of_the_peace dbr:Adultery dbr:Insult dbc:1950_in_Canadian_case_law dbr:British_Columbia_Court_of_Appeal dbr:Criminal_Code_(Canada) dbr:False_imprisonment dbr:Common_law dbr:Lexicon dbr:Voyeurism dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases dbr:Police_constable dbr:Revenge dbr:Patrick_Kerwin dbr:Arrest_warrant dbr:Riot dbr:Imprisonment dbr:Legal_burden_of_proof dbc:Sex_laws dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Canada dbr:Butcher_knife dbr:List_of_Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases_(Richards_Court_through_Fauteux_Court)
owl:sameAs
freebase:m.0ggw_g n13:4jjxQ yago-res:Frey_v_Fedoruk wikidata:Q5503289
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Lexum-scc2 dbt:Infobox_SCC
dbp:joinmajority
Rinfret C.J., Taschereau, Rand, Kellock, and Locke JJ.
dbp:citations
[1950] SCR 517, 1950 CanLII 1
dbp:history
Judgement for Fedoruk in the Court of Appeal for British Columbia
dbp:majority
Cartwright J.
dbp:ratio
Imprisonment in this case failed to be justified since peeping was not a recognized crime.
dbo:abstract
Frey v Fedoruk [1950] S.C.R. 517 is a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on the definition of a breach of the peace and whether being a "peeping tom" is a crime. The Court found that actions do not necessarily breach the peace just because they cause violent reactions. Due to this finding, courts would have less say in determining what is criminal as a breach of the peace, and the Parliament of Canada would have more.
dbp:caseName
Frey v Fedoruk
dbp:concurrence
Kerwin J.
dbp:decidedDate
1950-04-25
dbp:fullCaseName
Bernard Frey v. Stephen Fedoruk and Richard Percy Stone
dbp:heardDate
1950-02-07
dbp:scc
1949
gold:hypernym
dbr:Decision
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Frey_v_Fedoruk?oldid=1007533961&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
4650
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Frey_v_Fedoruk