This HTML5 document contains 47 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n16https://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
n10http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n2http://dbpedia.org/resource/G_1/03_and_G_2/
n17https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n19http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_1/03_and_G_2/
n13https://e-courses.epo.org/wbts/caselaw2012/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n12http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:03
rdfs:label
G 1/03 and G 2/03
rdfs:comment
G 1/03 and G 2/03 are two decisions of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO), which were both issued on April 8, 2004. The decisions, which are identical, relate to the allowability of introducing disclaimers during the prosecution of a European patent application or during opposition proceedings relating to a granted European patent. More precisely, they relate to whether and under which circumstances an amendment introducing a negative limitation to a claim is allowable, when neither the negative limitation nor the subject-matter excluded by it from the scope of the claim have a basis in the application as filed (Article 123(2) EPC).
foaf:depiction
n12:Scale_of_justice.png
dcterms:subject
dbc:Case_law_of_the_Enlarged_Board_of_Appeal_of_the_European_Patent_Office dbc:2004_in_Europe dbc:2004_in_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
4547549
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1117638545
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbc:Case_law_of_the_Enlarged_Board_of_Appeal_of_the_European_Patent_Office dbr:European_Patent_Organisation dbr:Amendments_under_the_European_Patent_Convention n10:Scale_of_justice.png dbr:Patentability dbr:Appeal_procedure_before_the_European_Patent_Office dbr:European_Patent_Convention dbr:Novelty_(patent) dbr:Inventive_step_under_the_European_Patent_Convention dbr:Disclosure_of_the_invention_under_the_European_Patent_Convention dbr:State_of_the_art dbr:Claim_(patent) dbr:Invention dbr:Opposition_procedure_before_the_European_Patent_Office dbr:Disclaimer_(patent) dbr:Filing_date dbc:2004_in_Europe dbr:Person_skilled_in_the_art dbc:2004_in_case_law dbr:Peter_Messerli
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n13:index.html n16:g030001ep1.html n16:g030002ep1.html
owl:sameAs
freebase:m.0c88pp wikidata:Q5515109 n17:4k5r4
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Further_reading_cleanup dbt:Reflist dbt:EPO_Case_law_book_2022 dbt:Decisions_and_opinions_of_the_Enlarged_Board_of_Appeal_of_the_European_Patent_Office dbt:Cite_video dbt:EPC_Article dbt:ECLI
dbo:thumbnail
n12:Scale_of_justice.png?width=300
dbo:abstract
G 1/03 and G 2/03 are two decisions of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO), which were both issued on April 8, 2004. The decisions, which are identical, relate to the allowability of introducing disclaimers during the prosecution of a European patent application or during opposition proceedings relating to a granted European patent. More precisely, they relate to whether and under which circumstances an amendment introducing a negative limitation to a claim is allowable, when neither the negative limitation nor the subject-matter excluded by it from the scope of the claim have a basis in the application as filed (Article 123(2) EPC).
gold:hypernym
dbr:Decisions
prov:wasDerivedFrom
n19:03?oldid=1117638545&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
12830
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
n19:03