This HTML5 document contains 32 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n15https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Graat_v_R
rdf:type
dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:label
Graat v R
rdfs:comment
Graat v R, [1982] 2 S.C.R. 819, is the leading case decided by the Supreme Court of Canada on the admissibility of opinion evidence. The Court held that lay persons may give opinion evidence, which is normally reserved only for expert witnesses, where the opinion so closely infers fact that it is a "compendious statement of fact". The determination is left to the discretion of the trial judge.
dcterms:subject
dbc:1982_in_Canadian_case_law dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_case_articles_without_infoboxes dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases dbc:Canadian_evidence_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
5698077
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1116561764
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbc:Canadian_evidence_case_law dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Canada dbr:Lay_person dbr:Admissible_evidence dbr:London,_Ontario dbr:Breathalyzer dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases dbr:Opinion_evidence dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_case_articles_without_infoboxes dbr:List_of_Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases dbc:1982_in_Canadian_case_law
owl:sameAs
freebase:m.0d_qvl n15:4kEMU wikidata:Q5590541
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Lexum-scc2 dbt:Italic_title dbt:Canada-law-stub dbt:Short_description
dbo:abstract
Graat v R, [1982] 2 S.C.R. 819, is the leading case decided by the Supreme Court of Canada on the admissibility of opinion evidence. The Court held that lay persons may give opinion evidence, which is normally reserved only for expert witnesses, where the opinion so closely infers fact that it is a "compendious statement of fact". The determination is left to the discretion of the trial judge.
gold:hypernym
dbr:Case
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Graat_v_R?oldid=1116561764&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
2206
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Graat_v_R