This HTML5 document contains 75 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n6http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:
n14https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n15http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
dbpedia-commonshttp://commons.dbpedia.org/resource/
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Green_v_Lord_Somerleyton
rdf:type
dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:Event100029378 yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Happening107283608
rdfs:label
Green v Lord Somerleyton
rdfs:comment
Green v Lord Somerleyton is an English land law and tort law case, concerning easements of surface water/ditch drainage and the tests for nuisance in English law. In this case there was no remedy for the flooding found to be natural and not recently exacerbated by the defendant. The court attached to the properties an old, 1921, easement of drainage passing both land holdings, in this case two common examples of lowland water engineering, dykes controlled against tides by one-way valves, mentioned in the properties' deeds and, duplicatively, established the right by prescription. The dykes lay in the claimant's own land who had failed to maintain them and failed to account for the flows caused by reduction of water extraction from the lake upstream. The claimant had failed to repair the pu
dbp:name
Green v Lord Somerleyton
foaf:depiction
n15:St_Olave's_Priory,_Priory_Farm,_1883-1897.jpg n15:The_restaurant_at_Priory_Farm,_St_Olaves_-_geograph.org.uk_-_1801601.jpg n15:St_Olaves_wind_pump_-_geograph.org.uk_-_242656.jpg
dcterms:subject
dbc:2003_in_case_law dbc:English_land_case_law dbc:Court_of_Appeal_(England_and_Wales)_cases dbc:2003_in_British_law
dbo:wikiPageID
35739514
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1108924103
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
n6:St_Olave's_Priory,_Priory_Farm,_1883-1897.jpg dbr:Jonathan_Parker dbr:English_tort_law dbr:Nuisance_in_English_law dbr:St_Olaves dbc:2003_in_case_law n6:The_restaurant_at_Priory_Farm,_St_Olaves_-_geograph.org.uk_-_1801601.jpg dbr:English_property_law dbr:Konrad_Schiemann dbr:Easement_by_prescription dbr:Honey_v_Silversprings dbc:2003_in_British_law dbr:Savile_Crossley,_3rd_Baron_Somerleyton dbc:Court_of_Appeal_(England_and_Wales)_cases dbr:Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales dbr:Rylands_v_Fletcher dbr:Easements_in_English_law dbr:English_land_law dbr:Christopher_Staughton dbr:Pwllbach_Colliery_Co_Ltd_v_Woodman dbr:English_trusts_law dbr:Norfolk_Broads dbr:The_Broads_National_Park dbr:Law_of_Property_Act_1925 dbc:English_land_case_law
owl:sameAs
n14:4ksag dbpedia-commons:Fritton_Decoy freebase:m.0jt76gc wikidata:Q5603616
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Infobox_court_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Cite_bailii dbt:Clist_easements dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Cquote dbt:Abbreviation dbt:Commons
dbo:thumbnail
n15:St_Olaves_wind_pump_-_geograph.org.uk_-_242656.jpg?width=300
dbp:caption
The claimant blamed inter alia the lack of renewal of the water pump replacing St Olaves windmill but its failure was expressly subject to a heavy rainfall exclusion. The claimant's farmhouse restaurant and defendant's lake are attractions in The Broads National Park.
dbp:court
dbr:Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales
dbp:fullName
John Green v Lord Somerleyton and others [trustees of a family settlement owning land neighbouring Green's land]
dbp:judges
dbr:Jonathan_Parker Sir Christopher Staughton dbr:Konrad_Schiemann
dbp:keywords
Easements; natural flooding; lakes; abatement of nuisance; law of mitigation of damage; declaratory relief sought; enlarged lake outside of Rylands v Fletcher type nuisance
dbo:abstract
Green v Lord Somerleyton is an English land law and tort law case, concerning easements of surface water/ditch drainage and the tests for nuisance in English law. In this case there was no remedy for the flooding found to be natural and not recently exacerbated by the defendant. The court attached to the properties an old, 1921, easement of drainage passing both land holdings, in this case two common examples of lowland water engineering, dykes controlled against tides by one-way valves, mentioned in the properties' deeds and, duplicatively, established the right by prescription. The dykes lay in the claimant's own land who had failed to maintain them and failed to account for the flows caused by reduction of water extraction from the lake upstream. The claimant had failed to repair the pump and clear ditches on his own land which had been agreed between the previous owners to give channelled drainage from a lake above. It was for the claimant to recognise the danger posed by its waterline being raised in 1954 by the building up of a weir.
dbp:concurring
Sir Christopher Staughton dbr:Konrad_Schiemann
dbp:dateDecided
2003-02-28
dbp:decisionBy
Jonathan Parker LJ
dbp:priorActions
Appellant failed at first instance before HHJ Rich QC sitting as High Court judge
gold:hypernym
dbr:Case
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Green_v_Lord_Somerleyton?oldid=1108924103&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
10121
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Green_v_Lord_Somerleyton