This HTML5 document contains 111 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n8https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/555/135/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n24https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/08pdf/
n25https://scholar.google.com/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n21https://www.oyez.org/cases/2008/
n7https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
umbel-rchttp://umbel.org/umbel/rc/
n23https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n10https://www.leagle.com/decision/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n15https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/145922/herring-v-united-states/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Herring_v._United_States
rdf:type
wikidata:Q2334719 umbel-rc:Event yago:Happening107283608 owl:Thing yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases dbo:Case yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:Event100029378 dbo:LegalCase yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Abstraction100002137 dbo:UnitOfWork yago:Case107308889
rdfs:label
Herring v. United States
rdfs:comment
Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 14, 2009. The court decided that the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies when a police officer makes an arrest based on an outstanding warrant in another jurisdiction, but the information regarding that warrant is later found to be incorrect because of a negligent error by that agency.
foaf:name
Bennie Dean Herring, Plaintiff, v. United States of America
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:2009_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbc:Coffee_County,_Alabama
dbo:wikiPageID
16022163
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1026250350
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Orin_Kerr dbr:Parallel_construction dbr:M.D._Ala. dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Middle_District_of_Alabama dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Fruit_of_the_poisonous_tree dbr:Alabama dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Adam_Liptak dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:United_States_v._Leon dbr:Journal_of_Criminal_Law_&_Criminology dbr:Methamphetamine dbc:2009_in_United_States_case_law dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:F.3d dbr:Mapp_v._Ohio dbr:F._Supp._2d dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Coffee_County,_Alabama dbr:Certiorari dbr:Chief_Justice_of_the_United_States dbr:SCOTUSblog dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbr:11th_Cir. dbr:Federal_prison dbr:Weeks_v._United_States dbr:John_G._Roberts dbr:Tom_Goldstein dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Eleventh_Circuit dbr:Exclusionary_rule dbr:Dale_County,_Alabama dbr:Good-faith_exception dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_555 dbr:Arizona_v._Evans dbc:Coffee_County,_Alabama
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n8: n10:20051741451fsupp2d129011640 n10:20071704492f3d121211704 n15: n21:07-513 n23:07-513.pdf n24:07-513.pdf n25:scholar_case%3Fcase=10573986864908308313
owl:sameAs
n7:4mHvc wikidata:Q5744122 freebase:m.03ql0qd yago-res:Herring_v._United_States
dbp:subsequent
Rehearing denied, .
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Reflist dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Ussc dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:US4thAmendment
dbp:dissent
Ginsburg Breyer
dbp:docket
7
dbp:joindissent
Souter Stevens, Souter, Breyer
dbp:joinmajority
Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito
dbp:lawsapplied
dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:oyez
n21:07-513
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
25920.0
dbp:uspage
135
dbp:usvol
555
dbp:arguedate
0001-10-07
dbp:argueyear
2008
dbp:case
Herring v. United States,
dbp:courtlistener
n15:
dbp:decidedate
0001-01-14
dbp:decideyear
2009
dbp:fullname
Bennie Dean Herring, Plaintiff, v. United States of America
dbp:holding
Evidence obtained after illegal searches or arrests based on simple police mistakes that are not the result of repeated patterns or flagrant misconduct cannot have the exclusionary rule used to suppress evidence. Convictions upheld.
dbp:justia
n8:
dbp:litigants
Herring v. United States
dbp:majority
Roberts
dbp:otherSource
Supreme Court
dbp:otherUrl
n24:07-513.pdf
dbo:abstract
Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 14, 2009. The court decided that the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies when a police officer makes an arrest based on an outstanding warrant in another jurisdiction, but the information regarding that warrant is later found to be incorrect because of a negligent error by that agency.
dbp:googlescholar
n25:scholar_case%3Fcase=10573986864908308313
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Herring_v._United_States?oldid=1026250350&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
13939
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Herring_v._United_States