This HTML5 document contains 58 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n11https://scholar.google.com/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n14https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4299187/intellectual-ventures-i-llc-v-symantec-corp/
n17https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n12http://dbpedia.org/property/concurrence/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Intellectual_Ventures_I_LLC_v._Symantec_Corp.
rdfs:label
Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Symantec Corp.
rdfs:comment
Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Symantec Corp., 838 F.3d 1307 (Fed. Cir. 2016) is a 2016 Federal Circuit decision concerning the patent eligibility of a computer-software claimed invention. In a split decision, a three-member panel of the court discussed the current legal status of such patents. The court held all three patents invalid as patent ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
dcterms:subject
dbc:2016_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit_cases dbc:Software_patent_case_law dbc:Gen_Digital dbc:United_States_patent_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
52734211
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1123346968
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Intellectual_Ventures dbc:2016_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Alice_Corp._v._CLS_Bank_Int'l dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit_cases dbc:Software_patent_case_law dbc:United_States_patent_case_law dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit dbr:U.S.P.Q.2d dbr:Federal_Supplement dbr:Non-practicing_entity dbr:Haldane_Robert_Mayer dbr:Mayo_Collaborative_Services_v._Prometheus_Labs.,_Inc. dbc:Gen_Digital dbr:Kara_Farnandez_Stoll dbr:Symantec_Corp dbr:Timothy_Dyk dbr:Trend_Micro dbr:Federal_Reporter
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n11:scholar_case%3Fcase=5504815906025170966 n14:
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q28456705 n17:2eG4Q
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Quote dbt:BBstyle dbt:Reflist dbt:Infobox_U.S._Courts_of_Appeals_case dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:USC
dbp:prior
259200.0
dbp:case
25920.0
dbp:citations
17280.0
dbp:court
dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit
dbp:courtlistener
n14:
dbp:decidedate
0001-09-30
dbp:decideyear
2016
dbp:fullname
Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Symantec Corp., et al
dbp:judges
dbr:Kara_Farnandez_Stoll dbr:Timothy_Dyk dbr:Haldane_Robert_Mayer
dbp:litigants
Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Symantec Corp.
dbp:majority
Dyk
dbp:otherSource
Google Scholar
dbp:otherUrl
n11:scholar_case%3Fcase=5504815906025170966
dbo:abstract
Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Symantec Corp., 838 F.3d 1307 (Fed. Cir. 2016) is a 2016 Federal Circuit decision concerning the patent eligibility of a computer-software claimed invention. In a split decision, a three-member panel of the court discussed the current legal status of such patents. The court held all three patents invalid as patent ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
dbp:concurrence
Mayer
n12:dissent
Stoll
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Intellectual_Ventures_I_LLC_v._Symantec_Corp.?oldid=1123346968&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
27425
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Intellectual_Ventures_I_LLC_v._Symantec_Corp.