This HTML5 document contains 870 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n13http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/print_documents/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
dbpedia-trhttp://tr.dbpedia.org/resource/
dbpedia-zhhttp://zh.dbpedia.org/resource/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbpedia-kohttp://ko.dbpedia.org/resource/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
dbpedia-simplehttp://simple.dbpedia.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n6https://web.archive.org/web/20080409010037/http:/bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/239/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
n14https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_the_United_States
rdfs:label
List of landmark court decisions in the United States 미국의 랜드마크 판례 목록 美国公民权领域重要判例列表
rdfs:comment
本条目收录美国法院在公民权领域内作出的具有里程碑意义的重大影响力判例。“具有里程碑意义”判例(在英国往往称为leading cases)通常是对宪法及法律中富有争议性的法律问题作出的重要的解释和指引,其通过以下多种方式对法律的解释做出改变: * 确立一项重要的新法律原则或新概念; * 因某项在先案例中存在负面影响或缺陷而将其推翻; * 从在先的法律原则中发展出更完善的新原则,在不违反尊重先例的原则下做出有区别的新判例; * 确立一项可验证或可衡量的标准,供法院在未来的审判中应用。 美国绝大多数具有重要影响力的判例均来自美国联邦最高法院。如最高法院不受理上诉或决定直接采用下级法院的判例,美国上诉法院的部分判决也会具有里程碑意义(如)。而各州最高法院做出的不少判决尽管在本州范围内具有重要影响力,但只有极少数具有革命性意义的案例会被其他州的法院所借鉴参考。 미국의 랜드마크 판례 목록은 미국 연방 대법원과 미국 연방 항소법원의 유명한 판례들을 모은 것이다. Landmark court decisions in the United States change the interpretation of existing law. Such a decision may settle the law in more than one way: * establishing a significant new legal principle or concept; * overturning prior precedent based on its negative effects or flaws in its reasoning; * distinguishing a new principle that refines a prior principle, thus departing from prior practice without violating the rule of stare decisis; * establishing a test or a measurable standard that can be applied by courts in future decisions.
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_case_law_lists dbc:Lists_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_by_status dbc:Lists_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:History_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
dbo:wikiPageID
14137098
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1124156762
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Desegregation_busing dbr:Minnesota_Voters_Alliance_v._Mansky dbr:Grand_jury dbr:Japanese_American_internment dbr:Hurtado_v._California dbr:Shaw_v._Reno dbr:Robinson_v._California dbr:U.S._state dbr:Abstention_doctrine dbr:Barnes_v._Glen_Theatre,_Inc. dbr:Reasonable_suspicion dbr:Elk_v._Wilkins dbr:Yick_Wo_v._Hopkins dbr:States'_rights dbr:Judiciary_Act_of_1789 dbr:Riley_v._California dbr:Youngberg_v._Romeo dbr:Elaine_Race_Riot dbr:Corporal_punishment dbr:Florida dbr:Muller_v._Oregon dbr:Mutual_Film_Corp._v._Industrial_Commission_of_Ohio dbr:Tenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Swann_v._Charlotte-Mecklenburg_Board_of_Education dbr:Katzenbach_v._McClung dbr:Bearden_v._Georgia dbr:Adarand_Constructors,_Inc._v._Peña dbr:List_of_amendments_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Twenty-sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Schmerber_v._California dbr:Home_rule_in_the_United_States dbr:Violence_Against_Women_Act dbr:Manual_Enterprises,_Inc._v._Day dbr:Apprendi_v._New_Jersey dbr:Establishment_Clause dbr:Bond_v._United_States_(2011) dbr:Kato_Kaelin dbr:Gun-Free_School_Zones_Act_of_1990 dbr:Diamond_v._Chakrabarty dbr:Due_process dbr:Eisenstadt_v._Baird dbr:Revlon,_Inc._v._MacAndrews_&_Forbes_Holdings,_Inc. dbr:Due_Process_Clause dbr:Sovereign_immunity dbr:Sovereign_immunity_in_the_United_States dbr:Murphy_v._National_Collegiate_Athletic_Association dbr:Mancusi_v._DeForte dbr:In_re_Gault dbr:National_Federation_of_Independent_Business_v._Sebelius dbr:Law_of_the_United_States dbr:Plessy_v._Ferguson dbr:Obligee dbr:Near_v._Minnesota dbr:Evidence dbr:McCulloch_v._Maryland dbr:Bolling_v._Sharpe dbr:Obscenity dbr:New_York_(state) dbr:Pierson_v._Ray dbr:Rucho_v._Common_Cause dbr:Gregg_v._Georgia dbr:Probation dbr:United_States_House_of_Representatives dbr:Lingle_v._Chevron_U.S.A._Inc. dbr:Gibbons_v._Ogden dbr:Double_jeopardy dbr:Speech_or_Debate_Clause dbr:Concurring_opinion dbr:Texas_v._White dbr:Sell_v._United_States dbr:Right_to_silence dbr:Solem_v._Bartlett dbr:Indictment dbr:Reynolds_v._Sims dbr:Illinois dbr:Carpenter_v._United_States dbr:Reynolds_v._United_States dbr:Marijuana dbr:Reid_v._Covert dbr:Citizens_to_Preserve_Overton_Park_v._Volpe dbr:Hazelwood_v._Kuhlmeier dbr:Gonzales_v._Carhart dbr:Texas_v._Johnson dbr:Gonzales_v._Oregon dbr:Birth_control dbr:Gonzales_v._Raich dbr:Batson_v._Kentucky dbr:Everson_v._Board_of_Education dbr:Marsh_v._Alabama dbr:Prosecution dbr:Marsh_v._Chambers dbr:Shapiro_v._Thompson dbr:Legal_principle dbr:Persistent_vegetative_state dbr:Treaty_of_Paris_(1783) dbr:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Police_power_(United_States_constitutional_law) dbr:Ableman_v._Booth dbr:Craig_v._Boren dbr:Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act dbr:Westboro_Baptist_Church dbr:Enemy_combatant dbr:Breard_v._Greene dbr:Public_accommodations dbr:Compulsory_vaccination dbr:Sweat_of_the_brow dbr:State_supreme_court dbr:Bowsher_v._Synar dbr:Crow_people dbr:Agins_v._City_of_Tiburon dbr:Lucas_v._South_Carolina_Coastal_Council dbr:Federal_Communications_Commission_v._Pacifica_Foundation dbr:Smith_v._Allwright dbr:Furman_v._Georgia dbr:Goldberg_v._Kelly dbr:Lee_v._Weisman dbr:Contributory_copyright_infringement dbr:Buckley_v._Valeo dbr:Employment_Division_v._Smith dbr:Guantanamo_Bay_detention_camp dbr:South_Carolina_v._Katzenbach dbr:Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964 dbr:Cleveland_Board_of_Education_v._Loudermill dbr:Weeks_v._United_States dbr:Civil_Rights_Act_of_1968 dbr:Steele_v._Louisville_&_Nashville_Railway_Co. dbr:Air_pollution dbr:Civil_Rights_Cases dbr:Bethel_School_District_v._Fraser dbr:Wyoming dbr:African_American dbr:P.2d dbr:Sexism dbr:Indigenous_people_of_the_United_States dbr:Stanley_v._Illinois dbr:Civil_Rights_Act_of_1866 dbr:Zelman_v._Simmons-Harris dbr:Felony_murder_rule dbr:Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc._v._Natural_Resources_Defense_Council,_Inc. dbr:Mapp_v._Ohio dbr:Federal_government_of_the_United_States dbr:Gomillion_v._Lightfoot dbr:Felony dbr:Prima_Paint_Corp._v._Flood_&_Conklin_Manufacturing_Co. dbr:Gregory_v._Helvering dbr:Eleventh_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Bostock_v._Clayton_County dbr:Oregon_v._Mitchell dbr:Virginia_State_Pharmacy_Board_v._Virginia_Citizens_Consumer_Council dbr:Citizenship_in_the_United_States dbr:Peer-to-peer dbr:Reno_v._American_Civil_Liberties_Union dbr:Interstate_Commerce_Commission dbr:Patent dbr:Juries_in_the_United_States dbr:United_States_National_Guard dbr:Product_liability dbr:Strict_scrutiny dbr:Fair_Labor_Standards_Act dbr:Federalism_in_the_United_States dbr:Wisconsin_v._Yoder dbr:Agostini_v._Felton dbr:Steward_Machine_Company_v._Davis dbr:Roper_v._Simmons dbr:United_States_presidential_election_in_Florida,_2000 dbr:Monopoly dbr:Dusky_v._United_States dbr:American_Legion_v._American_Humanist_Association dbr:Red_flag_(politics) dbr:Jurisdiction dbr:Fuck dbr:Military_tribunals_in_the_United_States dbr:Sodomy_laws_in_the_United_States dbr:Genetically_modified_organism dbr:Good_conduct_time dbr:Harassment dbr:Powers_of_the_president_of_the_United_States dbr:List_of_United_States_federal_agencies dbr:Eighth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Tison_v._Arizona dbr:Gravel_v._United_States dbr:Ohio_v._Robinette dbr:Southland_Corp._v._Keating dbr:Title_42_of_the_United_States_Code dbr:Nixon_v._Fitzgerald dbr:Nixon_v._General_Services_Administration dbr:Posadas_de_Puerto_Rico_Associates_v._Tourism_Co._of_Puerto_Rico dbr:Edwards_v._Aguillard dbr:Marquette_National_Bank_of_Minneapolis_v._First_of_Omaha_Service_Corp. dbr:Edwards_v._California dbr:Edwards_v._South_Carolina dbr:United_States_courts_of_appeals dbr:Flag_of_the_United_States dbr:Intentional_infliction_of_emotional_distress dbr:Defense_of_Marriage_Act dbr:Tinker_v._Des_Moines_Independent_Community_School_District dbr:Japanese_Americans dbr:Miller_test dbr:Corfield_v._Coryell dbr:Territories_of_the_United_States dbr:Wickard_v._Filburn dbr:Louisiana dbr:Constitution_of_Massachusetts dbr:Privacy_laws_of_the_United_States dbr:Skinner_v._Oklahoma dbr:Patent_Act_of_1952 dbr:Schuette_v._Coalition_to_Defend_Affirmative_Action dbr:Medellín_v._Texas dbr:Geneva_Conventions dbr:Block_booking dbr:Padilla_v._Kentucky dbr:United_States_v._Cooley dbr:North_Carolina dbr:Justiciability dbr:Gertz_v._Robert_Welch,_Inc. dbr:Proffitt_v._Florida dbr:Trump_v._Vance dbr:Dred_Scott_v._Sandford dbr:Montejo_v._Louisiana dbr:Rape dbr:Diversity_of_citizenship dbr:Chaplinsky_v._New_Hampshire dbr:Thirteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Command_hierarchy dbr:Trump_v._Hawaii dbr:Workplace_discrimination dbr:Assistance_of_Counsel_Clause dbr:Clear_and_present_danger dbr:Republican_Party_(United_States) dbr:Trump_v._Mazars_USA,_LLP dbr:Abington_School_District_v._Schempp dbr:United_States_constitutional_criminal_procedure dbr:Executive_Order_9066 dbr:Professional_and_Amateur_Sports_Protection_Act_of_1992 dbr:Miller_v._Alabama dbr:Colorado_River_Water_Conservation_District_v._United_States dbr:Global_Positioning_System dbr:Miller_v._California dbr:Illinois_v._Gates dbr:Entrapment dbr:New_York_State_Rifle_&_Pistol_Association,_Inc._v._Bruen dbr:Arnett_v._Kennedy dbr:Executive_privilege dbr:Meyer_v._Nebraska dbr:Board_of_directors dbr:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:New_York_v._Ferber dbr:Incorporation_of_the_Bill_of_Rights dbr:Espinoza_v._Montana_Department_of_Revenue dbr:United_States_Department_of_Justice dbr:Selective_Draft_Law_Cases dbr:Ex_parte_Milligan dbr:Afroyim_v._Rusk dbr:Selective_Service_Act_of_1917 dbr:Will_v._Michigan_Department_of_State_Police dbr:United_States_ex_rel._Accardi_v._Shaughnessy dbr:Ex_parte_Crow_Dog dbr:West_Virginia_State_Board_of_Education_v._Barnette dbr:Separate_but_equal dbr:U.S._Term_Limits,_Inc._v._Thornton dbr:Laidlaw_v._Organ dbr:Guantanamo_military_commission dbr:Ramos_v._Louisiana dbr:Foreign_policy_of_the_United_States dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:AT&T_Mobility_LLC_v._Concepcion dbr:US_Congress dbr:Garcia_v._San_Antonio_Metropolitan_Transit_Authority dbr:Unocal_Corp._v._Mesa_Petroleum_Co. dbr:Mathews_v._Eldridge dbr:Real_estate dbr:Sixteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Double_Jeopardy_Clause dbr:Massachusetts_Supreme_Judicial_Court dbr:City_of_Boerne_v._Flores dbr:Harlow_v._Fitzgerald dbr:Dolan_v._City_of_Tigard dbr:Dombrowski_v._Pfister dbr:J.E.B._v._Alabama_ex_rel._T.B. dbr:West_Virginia_v._EPA dbr:Sharp_v._Murphy dbr:Baze_v._Rees dbr:Guarantee_Clause dbr:Prince_v._Massachusetts dbr:Bicameralism dbr:Ex_parte_Young dbr:Hosanna-Tabor_Evangelical_Lutheran_Church_and_School_v._Equal_Employment_Opportunity_Commission dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:International_Court_of_Justice dbr:Cruzan_v._Director,_Missouri_Department_of_Health dbr:Pierce_v._Society_of_Sisters dbr:State_legislature_(United_States) dbr:Bucklew_v._Precythe dbr:R.G._&_G.R._Harris_Funeral_Homes_Inc._v._Equal_Employment_Opportunity_Commission dbr:Equal_protection_clause dbr:Confederate_States_of_America dbr:Sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Juvenile_delinquency_in_the_United_States dbr:Printz_v._United_States dbr:Massachusetts_v._Environmental_Protection_Agency dbr:Greenhouse_gas dbr:Goodridge_v._Department_of_Public_Health dbr:Oklahoma dbr:Glasser_v._United_States dbr:Glossip_v._Gross dbr:Arizona_v._United_States dbr:Balancing_test dbr:Coker_v._Georgia dbr:Racism_in_the_United_States dbr:Kahler_v._Kansas dbr:Federal_common_law dbr:Frontiero_v._Richardson dbr:Capital_punishment_in_the_United_States dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Southern_District_of_New_York dbr:Escola_v._Coca-Cola_Bottling_Co. dbr:Zoning_in_the_United_States dbr:Contract_Clause dbr:Carson_v._Makin dbr:Hans_v._Louisiana dbr:Defamation dbr:Missouri_ex_rel._Gaines_v._Canada dbr:Supremacy_Clause dbr:Jones_v._Alfred_H._Mayer_Co. dbr:Missouri_v._Holland dbr:Church_of_Lukumi_Babalu_Aye_v._City_of_Hialeah dbr:McCutcheon_v._Federal_Election_Commission dbr:Abatement_in_pleading dbr:McCollum_v._Board_of_Education dbr:Wolff_v._McDonnell dbr:Chae_Chan_Ping_v._United_States dbr:Graham_v._Florida dbr:Law dbr:Clinton_v._City_of_New_York dbr:Cruel_and_unusual_punishment dbr:Clinton_v._Jones dbr:Federal_preemption dbr:United_States_Environmental_Protection_Agency dbr:Obergefell_v._Hodges dbr:Norris–La_Guardia_Act_of_1932 dbr:Free_rider_problem dbr:Sony_Corp._of_America_v._Universal_City_Studios,_Inc. dbr:Same-sex_marriage_in_the_United_States dbr:United_States_v._U.S._District_Court dbr:Mitigating_factor dbr:Fiduciary dbr:Fair_use dbr:Federal_judiciary_of_the_United_States dbr:Ware_v._Hylton dbr:United_States_v._South-Eastern_Underwriters_Association dbr:Necessary_and_Proper_Clause dbr:Assisted_suicide dbr:Brady_Handgun_Violence_Prevention_Act dbr:National_Labor_Relations_Board dbr:Roe_v._Wade dbr:Sports_betting dbr:Romer_v._Evans dbr:Joseph_Burstyn,_Inc._v._Wilson dbr:Pentagon_Papers dbr:Stare_decisis dbr:Poll_tax_(United_States) dbr:Kennedy_v._Bremerton_School_District dbr:District_of_Columbia dbr:School_segregation_in_the_United_States dbr:Kennedy_v._Louisiana dbr:Central_Hudson_Gas_&_Electric_Corp._v._Public_Service_Commission dbr:United_States_Foreign_Intelligence_Surveillance_Court_of_Review dbr:Substantial_similarity dbr:Crawford_v._Washington dbr:Morrissey_v._Brewer dbr:Erie_Railroad_Co._v._Tompkins dbr:Janus_v._AFSCME dbr:Oliphant_v._Suquamish_Indian_Tribe dbr:Lochner_v._New_York dbr:2000_United_States_presidential_election dbr:Luther_v._Borden dbr:New_York_Times_Co._v._United_States dbr:Supplemental_jurisdiction dbr:United_States_Senate dbr:Privileges_and_Immunities_Clause dbr:Roger_Traynor dbr:Forum_(legal) dbr:Altitude_Express,_Inc._v._Zarda dbr:Brown_v._Entertainment_Merchants_Association dbr:Just_compensation dbr:Polygamy dbr:Brady_v._Maryland dbr:Swift_v._Tyson dbr:Third_Enforcement_Act dbr:Gerrymandering_in_the_United_States dbr:Berghuis_v._Thompkins dbr:Brown_v._Mississippi dbr:Brown_v._Board_of_Education dbr:Pollock_v._Farmers'_Loan_&_Trust_Co. dbr:Exculpatory_evidence dbr:Prior_restraint dbr:Bible dbr:Michigan_v._Jackson dbr:Whole_Woman's_Health_v._Hellerstedt dbr:Gideon_v._Wainwright dbr:Aboriginal_title_in_the_United_States dbr:Original_jurisdiction dbr:Flast_v._Cohen dbr:Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District dbr:Aboriginal_title dbr:Clean_Air_Act_(United_States) dbr:Interstate_Commerce_Act_of_1887 dbr:Thompson_v._City_of_Louisville dbr:Michigan_v._EPA dbr:Bryan_v._Itasca_County dbr:Overbreadth_doctrine dbr:Mentally_retarded dbr:Hylton_v._United_States dbr:Brnovich_v._Democratic_National_Committee dbr:O'Connor_v._Donaldson dbr:District_of_Columbia_v._Heller dbr:O'Connor_v._Ortega dbr:Reporters'_privilege dbr:Americans_with_Disabilities_Act_of_1990 dbr:Perfect_10,_Inc._v._Visa_Int'l_Serv._Ass'n dbr:Davis_v._Beason dbr:Chiafalo_v._Washington dbr:Heart_of_Atlanta_Motel,_Inc._v._United_States dbr:Court dbr:Fetal_viability dbr:Citizens_United_v._Federal_Election_Commission dbr:Judicial_review_in_the_United_States dbr:Presser_v._Illinois dbr:One,_Inc._v._Olesen dbr:Planned_Parenthood_v._Casey dbr:Humphrey's_Executor_v._United_States dbr:Background_check dbr:Film dbr:Springer_v._Government_of_the_Philippine_Islands dbr:Estate_(law) dbr:Burwell_v._Hobby_Lobby_Stores,_Inc. dbr:Hustler_Magazine_v._Falwell dbr:Declaratory_judgment dbr:Microsoft dbr:Rogers_v._Okin dbr:Jackson_v._Indiana dbr:Board_of_Education_v._Earls dbr:Daubert_v._Merrell_Dow_Pharmaceuticals dbr:Bushrod_Washington dbr:Stenberg_v._Carhart dbr:Corporate_political_spending dbr:Boumediene_v._Bush dbr:Henderson_v._United_States_(1950) dbr:Foreign_national dbr:Saenz_v._Roe dbr:Anti-miscegenation_laws_in_the_United_States dbr:United_States_v._Windsor dbr:Cause_of_action dbr:Free_Speech_Clause dbr:International_Shoe_v._Washington dbr:Internet dbr:Santa_Fe_Independent_School_Dist._v._Doe dbr:American_Civil_War dbr:United_States_v._Wheeler_(1920) dbr:United_States_v._Wheeler_(1978) dbr:Strauder_v._West_Virginia dbr:Franklin_D._Roosevelt dbr:Penn_Central_Transportation_Co._v._New_York_City dbr:Minister_(Christianity) dbr:Buck_v._Bell dbr:United_States_v._Virginia dbr:Halkin_v._Helms dbr:U.S._Congress dbr:Intelligent_design dbr:United_States_Bill_of_Rights dbr:Hernandez_v._Texas dbr:Reed_v._Reed dbr:Price_Waterhouse_v._Hopkins dbr:Burford_v._Sun_Oil_Co. dbr:Involuntary_commitment dbr:Washington_v._Glucksberg dbr:Hamdan_v._Rumsfeld dbr:Parole_board dbr:Texas dbr:Rasul_v._Bush dbr:Intermediate_scrutiny dbr:Lawrence_v._Texas dbr:South_Dakota_v._Dole dbr:Shelby_County_v._Holder dbr:Federal_Communications_Commission dbr:Association_for_Molecular_Pathology_v._Myriad_Genetics,_Inc. dbr:Art dbr:Coleman_v._Miller dbc:United_States_case_law_lists dbr:Major_Crimes_Act dbr:New_Negro_Alliance_v._Sanitary_Grocery_Co. dbr:Taxing_and_Spending_Clause dbr:Health_insurance_mandate dbr:United_States_v._Wong_Kim_Ark dbr:Probable_cause dbr:Kentucky dbr:Wesberry_v._Sanders dbr:Selle_v._Gibb dbr:Griswold_v._Connecticut dbr:United_States_Congress dbr:Presentment_Clause dbc:Lists_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_by_status dbr:Cooley_v._Board_of_Wardens dbr:Crandall_v._Nevada dbr:Hamdi_v._Rumsfeld dbr:Baker_v._Carr dbr:Latin_cross dbr:Irene_Morgan dbr:Controlled_Substances_Act dbr:Executive_Order_13780 dbr:Uniform_Code_of_Military_Justice dbr:Swift_and_Company_v._United_States dbr:Gitlow_v._New_York dbr:Draft-card_burning dbr:Racism dbr:National_Labor_Relations_Act dbr:Lord's_Prayer dbr:Blakely_v._Washington dbr:National_Association_for_the_Advancement_of_Colored_People_v._Alabama dbr:Heath_v._Alabama dbr:Symbolic_speech dbr:Vagueness_doctrine dbr:Kelo_v._City_of_New_London dbr:Murdock_v._Pennsylvania dbr:Abortion dbr:United_States_Constitution dbr:Fighting_words dbr:Oneida_Indian_Nation_of_New_York_v._County_of_Oneida dbr:Garcetti_v._Ceballos dbr:Moore_v._Dempsey dbr:Compagnie_Francaise_de_Navigation_a_Vapeur_v._Louisiana_Board_of_Health dbr:Welfare dbr:NSA dbr:Vernonia_School_District_47J_v._Acton dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Seventh_Circuit dbr:Fifteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbc:Lists_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Virginia_Sterilization_Act_of_1924 dbr:Ford_v._Wainwright dbr:Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965 dbr:Lethal_injection dbr:Louisiana_ex_rel._Francis_v._Resweber dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit dbr:Corporation_of_Presiding_Bishop_of_Church_of_Jesus_Christ_of_Latter-day_Saints_v._Amos dbr:Zucht_v._King dbr:United_States_v._One_Book_Called_Ulysses dbr:Gates_v._Collier dbr:Cantwell_v._Connecticut dbr:Right_to_counsel dbr:Lemon_v._Kurtzman dbr:Johnson_v._M'Intosh dbc:History_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Masterpiece_Cakeshop_v._Colorado_Civil_Rights_Commission dbr:U.S._Constitution dbr:Immigration_and_Nationality_Act dbr:Privileges_or_Immunities_Clause dbr:Harris_v._Harvey_(1979) dbr:Hurley_v._Irish-American_Gay,_Lesbian,_and_Bisexual_Group_of_Boston dbr:Immigration_and_Naturalization_Service_v._Chadha dbr:Town_of_Greece_v._Galloway dbr:Ineffective_assistance_of_counsel dbr:Legal_doctrine dbr:Roth_v._United_States dbr:Voting_rights_in_the_United_States dbr:Regents_of_the_University_of_California_v._Bakke dbr:Common_law dbr:Legal_liability dbr:The_Paquete_Habana dbr:San_Antonio_Independent_School_District_v._Rodriguez dbr:Commerce_Clause dbr:Fulton_v._City_of_Philadelphia dbr:McCleskey_v._Kemp dbr:Barron_v._Baltimore dbr:Bivens_v._Six_Unknown_Named_Agents dbr:Parochial_school dbr:Legislative_veto dbr:Youngstown_Sheet_&_Tube_Co._v._Sawyer dbr:Right_to_keep_and_bear_arms_in_the_United_States dbr:Mississippi_University_for_Women dbr:Mississippi_University_for_Women_v._Hogan dbr:Stromberg_v._California dbr:Bowers_v._Hardwick dbr:Animal_sacrifice dbr:United_States_v._Butler dbr:California_Motor_Transport_Co._v._Trucking_Unlimited dbr:New_Jersey_v._T._L._O. dbr:Newspaper dbr:Betts_v._Brady dbr:Involuntary_servitude dbr:Constitution_of_the_United_States dbr:Mississippi_State_Penitentiary dbr:Mob_violence dbr:New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan dbr:United_States dbr:Property dbr:Insanity_Defense dbr:Korematsu_v._United_States dbr:Fletcher_v._Peck dbr:Slavery_in_the_United_States dbr:Incarceration_in_the_United_States dbr:Browder_v._Gayle dbr:Conscription_in_the_United_States dbr:Covenant_(law) dbr:Kent_v._Dulles dbr:United_States_v._Cruikshank dbr:United_States_v._Curtiss-Wright_Export_Corp. dbr:Expectation_of_privacy dbr:United_States_v._Darby_Lumber_Co. dbr:Monroe_v._Pape dbr:Parole dbr:Line_Item_Veto_Act_of_1996 dbr:Talton_v._Mayes dbr:Impeachment_in_the_United_States dbr:Loving_v._Virginia dbr:Freedom_of_movement dbr:Freedom_of_movement_under_United_States_law dbr:State_governments_of_the_United_States dbr:George_W._Bush dbr:Edmunds_Act dbr:Income_tax_in_the_United_States dbr:Property_tax_in_the_United_States dbr:Free_Exercise_Clause dbr:Feist_v._Rural dbr:Freedom_of_contract dbr:Jurek_v._Texas dbr:Stump_v._Sparkman dbr:DNA dbr:Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Contract_law dbr:Compulsory_sterilization dbr:Minersville_School_District_v._Gobitis dbr:United_States_v._Guest dbr:Atkins_v._Virginia dbr:Presidency_of_George_W._Bush dbr:Boynton_v._Virginia dbr:Herrera_v._Wyoming dbr:Marbury_v._Madison dbr:Customary_international_law dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Communications_Decency_Act dbr:School_district dbr:Chambers_v._Florida dbr:Bad_faith dbr:Self-incrimination dbr:Taylor_v._Louisiana dbr:Napster dbr:Godinez_v._Moran dbr:Pledge_of_Allegiance_(United_States) dbr:Roberts_v._Louisiana dbr:Peremptory_challenge dbr:Indian_tribe dbr:Bush_v._Gore dbr:Jacobson_v._Massachusetts dbr:False_imprisonment dbr:Rosenberger_v._University_of_Virginia dbr:Diversity_jurisdiction dbr:Exclusionary_rule dbr:Public_figure dbr:Partial-Birth_Abortion_Ban_Act dbr:Sarah_Keys_v._Carolina_Coach_Company dbr:Epperson_v._Arkansas dbr:Auer_v._Robbins dbr:American_Indian_Religious_Freedom_Act dbr:Sorrells_v._United_States dbr:Snyder_v._Phelps dbr:Search_and_seizure dbr:Cohen_v._California dbr:Competence_(law) dbr:Preliminary_hearing dbr:United_States_v._Lopez dbr:Brandenburg_v._Ohio dbr:Connick_v._Myers dbr:President_of_the_United_States dbr:Lyng_v._Northwest_Indian_Cemetery_Protective_Ass'n dbr:Cohens_v._Virginia dbr:Broadcasting_in_the_United_States dbr:Competency_evaluation_(law) dbr:Minimum_wage dbr:Village_of_Euclid_v._Ambler_Realty_Co. dbr:United_States_v._Lara dbr:Racial_quota dbr:Medicaid dbr:Chisholm_v._Georgia dbr:United_States_v._Kagama dbr:McCarran_Internal_Security_Act dbr:Plenary_power dbr:Pennsylvania dbr:Escobedo_v._Illinois dbr:Local_government_in_the_United_States dbr:Interest dbr:Cooper_v._Aaron dbr:Workplace_harassment dbr:United_States_v._Jones_(2012) dbr:Boy_Scouts_of_America_v._Dale dbr:Fruit_of_the_poisonous_tree dbr:Title_II_of_the_Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964 dbr:Burlington_Northern_&_Santa_Fe_Railway_Co._v._White dbr:Article_Two_of_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Freedom_of_speech_in_the_United_States dbr:United_States_v._Morrison dbr:Canterbury_v._Spence dbr:Dividend dbr:Regulatory_taking dbr:Powell_v._Alabama dbr:File-sharing dbr:Connally_v._General_Construction_Co. dbr:Political_question dbr:Equal_Protection_Clause dbr:Lone_Wolf_v._Hitchcock dbr:Tribal_sovereignty_in_the_United_States dbr:Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Act dbr:United_States_v._Morgan_(1954) dbr:Silverthorne_Lumber_Co._v._United_States dbr:Oncale_v._Sundowner_Offshore_Services dbr:Dartmouth_College_v._Woodward dbr:Qualified_immunity dbr:Term_limits_in_the_United_States dbr:United_States_v._Microsoft_Corp. dbr:Harper_v._Virginia_State_Board_of_Elections dbr:Federal_Arbitration_Act dbr:United_States_v._Miller dbr:Washington_(state) dbr:Intellectual_disability dbr:Commercial_speech dbr:Allgeyer_v._Louisiana dbr:Freedom_of_thought dbr:Duty_of_fair_representation dbr:Barker_v._Wingo dbr:United_States_Armed_Forces dbr:Phillips_v._Martin_Marietta_Corp. dbr:Woodson_v._North_Carolina dbr:Myers_v._United_States dbr:Treason dbr:Tribe_(Native_American) dbr:Consular_nonreviewability dbr:Indian_reservation dbr:United_States_v._Paramount_Pictures,_Inc. dbr:Wheaton_v._Peters dbr:Bighorn_National_Forest dbr:National_Labor_Relations_Board_v._Jones_&_Laughlin_Steel_Corporation dbr:Berman_v._Parker dbr:Arbitration_in_the_United_States dbr:Garner_v._Louisiana dbr:Pickering_v._Board_of_Education dbr:Outline_of_United_States_federal_Indian_law_and_policy dbr:Alice_Corp._v._CLS_Bank_International dbr:Addington_v._Texas dbr:McGirt_v._Oklahoma dbr:Terry_v._Ohio dbr:United_States_v._Nixon dbr:Burden_of_proof_(law) dbr:Coram_nobis dbr:Statute_of_limitations dbr:Injunction dbr:United_States_v._O'Brien dbr:Engblom_v._Carey dbr:Vacco_v._Quill dbr:Creationism dbr:J._W._Hampton,_Jr._&_Co._v._United_States dbr:Santa_Clara_Pueblo_v._Martinez dbr:Monell_v._Department_of_Social_Services_of_the_City_of_New_York dbr:Video_game dbr:Katzenbach_v._Morgan dbr:State_court_(United_States) dbr:Little_v._Barreme dbr:Engel_v._Vitale dbr:Katz_v._United_States dbr:McDonald_v._City_of_Chicago dbr:Conflict_of_interest dbr:Enmund_v._Florida dbr:A&M_Records,_Inc._v._Napster,_Inc. dbr:Trusty_system_(prison) dbr:Strickland_v._Washington dbr:Shelley_v._Kraemer dbr:Slaughter-House_Cases dbr:West_Coast_Hotel_Co._v._Parrish dbr:Deportation dbr:NAACP_v._Claiborne_Hardware_Co. dbr:Accardi_Doctrine dbr:Copyright_law_of_the_United_States dbr:Renting dbr:Curtis_Publishing_Co._v._Butts dbr:Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women's_Health_Organization dbr:Branzburg_v._Hayes dbr:Worcester_v._Georgia dbr:Militia_(United_States) dbr:Implied_powers dbr:Copyrights dbr:Martin_v._Hunter's_Lessee dbr:Admission_to_the_Union dbr:Hunter_v._City_of_Pittsburgh dbr:Regulation dbr:Treaty dbr:Undue_burden_standard dbr:Menominee_Tribe_v._United_States dbr:Writ dbr:Schenck_v._United_States dbr:Affirmative_action_in_the_United_States dbr:Native_Americans_in_the_United_States dbr:Direct_tax dbr:County_of_Oneida_v._Oneida_Indian_Nation_of_New_York_State dbr:Diminishment dbr:National_Socialist_Party_of_America_v._Village_of_Skokie dbr:Caveat_emptor dbr:Article_Four_of_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Grutter_v._Bollinger dbr:Tort dbr:Actual_malice dbr:Dillon_v._Gloss dbr:Georgia_v._Randolph dbr:Carey_v._Population_Services_International dbr:Williams_v._Lee dbr:Judicial_immunity dbr:Mitsubishi_Motors_Corp._v._Soler_Chrysler-Plymouth,_Inc. dbr:Miranda_v._Arizona dbr:Miranda_warning dbr:Aptheker_v._Secretary_of_State dbr:Gagnon_v._Scarpelli dbr:Racial_segregation_in_the_United_States dbr:Subject-matter_jurisdiction dbr:Georgia_(U.S._state) dbr:Citizenship_Clause dbr:Nonintercourse_Act
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n6:239.F3d.1004.00-16403.00-16401.html n13:a4_2_1s18.html
owl:sameAs
dbpedia-tr:Amerika_Birleşik_Devletleri'ndeki_emsal_kararlar_listesi wikidata:Q6624907 n14:4qqNb dbpedia-zh:美国公民权领域重要判例列表 dbpedia-simple:List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_the_United_States dbpedia-ko:미국의_랜드마크_판례_목록
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Short_description dbt:SCOTUScaselists dbt:For dbt:Main dbt:Ussc dbt:Apostrophe
dbp:page
390 714 919 241 510
dbp:volume
462 478 262 268 379
dbp:year
1925 1923 1983 1964 1986
dbo:abstract
Landmark court decisions in the United States change the interpretation of existing law. Such a decision may settle the law in more than one way: * establishing a significant new legal principle or concept; * overturning prior precedent based on its negative effects or flaws in its reasoning; * distinguishing a new principle that refines a prior principle, thus departing from prior practice without violating the rule of stare decisis; * establishing a test or a measurable standard that can be applied by courts in future decisions. In the United States, landmark court decisions come most frequently from the Supreme Court. United States courts of appeals may also make such decisions, particularly if the Supreme Court chooses not to review the case or if it adopts the holding of the lower court, such as in Smith v. Collin. Although many cases from state supreme courts are significant in developing the law of that state, only a few are so revolutionary that they announce standards that many other state courts then choose to follow. 本条目收录美国法院在公民权领域内作出的具有里程碑意义的重大影响力判例。“具有里程碑意义”判例(在英国往往称为leading cases)通常是对宪法及法律中富有争议性的法律问题作出的重要的解释和指引,其通过以下多种方式对法律的解释做出改变: * 确立一项重要的新法律原则或新概念; * 因某项在先案例中存在负面影响或缺陷而将其推翻; * 从在先的法律原则中发展出更完善的新原则,在不违反尊重先例的原则下做出有区别的新判例; * 确立一项可验证或可衡量的标准,供法院在未来的审判中应用。 美国绝大多数具有重要影响力的判例均来自美国联邦最高法院。如最高法院不受理上诉或决定直接采用下级法院的判例,美国上诉法院的部分判决也会具有里程碑意义(如)。而各州最高法院做出的不少判决尽管在本州范围内具有重要影响力,但只有极少数具有革命性意义的案例会被其他州的法院所借鉴参考。 미국의 랜드마크 판례 목록은 미국 연방 대법원과 미국 연방 항소법원의 유명한 판례들을 모은 것이다.
gold:hypernym
dbr:List
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_the_United_States?oldid=1124156762&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
138587
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_the_United_States