This HTML5 document contains 52 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n17https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n13http://dbpedia.org/property/concurrence/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Mackeigan_v_Hickman
rdf:type
dbo:Place
rdfs:label
Mackeigan v Hickman
rdfs:comment
Mackeigan v Hickman, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 796 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on judicial independence. The Court unanimously held that to require a federal judge to explain his or her decisions would violate the principle of judicial independence.
dcterms:subject
dbc:Canadian_constitutional_case_law dbc:1989_in_Canadian_case_law dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases
dbo:wikiPageID
3998961
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
887137801
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Leonard_L._Pace dbr:Constitution_Act,_1867 dbr:Judicial_independence dbr:Provincial_Judges_Reference dbr:Ultra_vires dbc:Canadian_constitutional_case_law dbr:List_of_Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases_(Dickson_Court) dbr:Valente_v._The_Queen dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Canada dbr:Donald_Marshall_Jr. dbr:Beverley_McLachlin dbr:R._v._Généreux dbc:1989_in_Canadian_case_law dbr:Provincial_Court_Judges'_Assn._of_New_Brunswick_v._New_Brunswick_(Minister_of_Justice) dbr:Nova_Scotia_Court_of_Appeal dbr:Aboriginal_peoples_in_Canada dbr:Therrien_(Re) dbc:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases dbr:Royal_commission dbr:Beauregard_v._Canada
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q17109047 freebase:m.0bbsmj n17:fR8w
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Lexum-scc2 dbt:SCCInfoBox
dbp:docket
21351 21315
dbp:joinmajority
L'Heureux‑Dubé and Gonthier JJ.
dbp:history
from NS Court of Appeal
dbp:majority
McLachlin J.
dbo:abstract
Mackeigan v Hickman, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 796 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on judicial independence. The Court unanimously held that to require a federal judge to explain his or her decisions would violate the principle of judicial independence.
dbp:caseName
Mackeigan v Hickman
dbp:concurrence
Lamer J. La Forest J.
n13:dissent
Cory J. Wilson J.
dbp:decidedDate
1989-10-05
dbp:notparticipating
Dickson C.J.
dbp:ruling
Appeal dismissed
dbp:scc
1988
gold:hypernym
dbr:Court
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Mackeigan_v_Hickman?oldid=887137801&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
3818
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Mackeigan_v_Hickman