This HTML5 document contains 274 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
n16https://scholar.google.com/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n22https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/335/173/248813/
n17https://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_844/
n11http://openjurist.org/392/us/364/
n15https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
n9https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/392/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n21https://www.oyez.org/cases/1967/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n23https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/379/897/361886/
n20http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep392/usrep392364/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n14http://supreme.justia.com/us/392/364/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Mancusi_v._DeForte
rdf:type
dbo:Case yago:Case107308889 owl:Thing yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 wikidata:Q2334719 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:UnitOfWork dbo:LegalCase yago:Event100029378 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:Happening107283608 yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases
rdfs:label
Mancusi v. DeForte
rdfs:comment
Mancusi v. DeForte, 392 U.S. 364 (1968), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court on privacy and the Fourth Amendment. It originated in the lower courts as United States ex rel. Frank DeForte, appellant v. Vincent R. Mancusi, Warden of Attica Prison, Attica, New York, appellee, a petition for a writ of habeas corpus by a prisoner who had exhausted all his state appeals. By a 6–3 margin the Court affirmed the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit's reversal of a district court denial of the petition.
foaf:name
United States ex rel. Frank DeForte, appellant v. Vincent R. Mancusi, Warden of Attica Prison, Attica, New York, appellee
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbc:United_States_privacy_case_law dbc:International_Brotherhood_of_Teamsters dbc:1968_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Nassau_County,_New_York dbc:United_States_habeas_corpus_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:Jukeboxes dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court
dbo:wikiPageID
31460021
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1056719337
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Labor_union dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbr:Holding_(law) dbr:John_Little_McClellan dbr:Real_property dbr:Precedent dbr:Jones_v._United_States_(1960) dbr:Suspended_sentence dbr:Oral_argument dbr:Sting_operation dbr:Green_Haven_Correctional_Facility dbr:Akron,_Ohio dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbr:Miranda_rights dbr:Collective_bargaining dbr:Self-incrimination dbr:Termination_of_employment dbr:Habeas_corpus dbr:Trespassing dbr:Information_technology dbr:Internet_Service_Provider dbr:Felony dbr:Section_1983 dbr:Plurality_opinion dbr:Camp_bed dbr:Antonin_Scalia dbr:Silverthorne_Lumber_Co._v._United_States dbr:Covert_listening_device dbr:Alex_Kozinski dbr:Immigration_and_Naturalization_Service dbr:Bookmaker dbr:Alien_(law) dbr:Rakas_v._Illinois dbr:Child_pornography dbr:Harry_Blackmun dbr:Lecturer dbr:Byron_White dbr:Oliver_Wendell_Holmes,_Jr. dbr:Washington_(state) dbr:Tupperware_party dbr:Potter_Stewart dbr:Workplace_privacy dbr:Electronic_mail dbr:Jimmy_Hoffa dbr:Concurring_opinion dbr:Union_organizer dbr:Louis_Brandeis dbr:SWAT dbr:Hard_drive dbr:Post_hoc_theorizing dbr:Extortion dbr:Nassau_County,_New_York dbr:Writ dbr:Kaufman_v._United_States dbr:Racketeering dbc:United_States_privacy_case_law dbr:New_York_Metropolitan_area dbr:Impasse dbr:Wiretapping dbr:Witness_impeachment dbr:Attica_Correctional_Facility dbr:Frank_M._Hull dbr:Indictment dbr:Kansas_Supreme_Court dbr:Paper_local dbr:Southern_California dbr:New_York_Court_of_Appeals dbr:Plea_bargain dbr:Exclusionary_rule dbr:United_States_Senate_Select_Committee_on_Improper_Activities_in_Labor_and_Management dbr:Securities_fraud dbr:Mary_Beck_Briscoe dbr:Shell_casing dbr:Hugo_Black dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Tenth_Circuit dbc:International_Brotherhood_of_Teamsters dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Third_Circuit dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fourth_Circuit dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit dbr:Majority_opinion dbr:Westchester_County,_New_York dbr:Character_(computing) dbr:Habeas_corpus_in_the_United_States dbr:Leonard_Page_Moore dbr:New_York_Supreme_Court,_Appellate_Division dbr:F._Supp. dbr:En_banc dbr:Reproductive_freedom dbr:Case_law dbr:International_Brotherhood_of_Teamsters dbr:University_of_Washington_School_of_Law dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Western_District_of_New_York dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Eleventh_Circuit dbr:Summary_judgement dbr:Mineola,_New_York dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Fifth_Circuit dbr:Residency_(medicine) dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_First_Circuit dbr:Olmstead_v._United_States dbr:Chief_Judge_of_the_New_York_Court_of_Appeals dbr:The_New_York_Times dbr:O'Connor_v._Ortega dbr:Ontario_v._Quon dbr:Web_cache dbr:Jukebox dbr:Mail_fraud dbr:Search_warrant dbr:F.2d dbr:Internet dbr:Civil_procedure dbr:Alphanumeric_paging dbr:Sexting dbr:Exigent_circumstances dbr:Conspiracy_(crime) dbr:Charles_S._Desmond dbr:Diarmuid_O'Scannlain dbr:Fruit_of_the_poisonous_tree dbr:Prison_warden dbr:Dissenting_opinion dbr:Hudson_Valley dbr:John_Oliver_Henderson dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Anthony_Kennedy dbr:Certiorari dbr:N.E.2d dbr:Subpoena_duces_tecum dbr:Sleep_deprivation dbr:Reasonable_suspicion dbr:Sing_Sing dbr:Chief_of_staff dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Reasonable_expectation_of_privacy dbr:Dictum dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_392 dbr:Mapp_v._Ohio dbr:Stone_v._Powell dbr:Sandra_Day_O'Connor dbr:Standing_(law) dbr:Dutchess_County,_New_York dbr:Independence_Day_(United_States) dbr:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Lewis_F._Powell,_Jr. dbr:First_impression_(law) dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Southern_District_of_New_York dbr:Jury_instructions dbr:Grand_jury dbr:Robert_F._Kennedy dbr:Dave_Beck dbr:Rum-running dbr:Thomas_Gibbs_Gee dbr:Office_politics dbr:De_facto dbr:Connick_v._Myers dbr:Prohibition dbr:Information_Age dbr:John_Marshall_Harlan_II dbr:Organized_crime dbc:United_States_habeas_corpus_case_law dbr:District_attorney dbr:New_York_metropolitan_area dbr:Telephone_exchange dbr:Hung_jury dbc:1968_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Coercion dbc:Jukeboxes dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court dbr:Cocaine dbr:John_Carbone_Porfilio dbr:Telephone_booth dbc:Nassau_County,_New_York dbr:Juke_box dbr:Vote_stacking dbr:Minnesota_v._Carter dbr:Second_wind_(sleep) dbr:Sua_sponte dbr:Stipulation dbr:Closing_argument dbr:Irving_Kaufman dbr:De_jure dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Paul_Joseph_Kelly,_Jr. dbr:Exhibit_(legal) dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Warren_Court dbr:Katz_v._United_States dbr:Terry_v._Ohio dbr:Warren_Court dbr:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:New_York_State_Court_of_Appeals
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n9:364.html n16:scholar_case%3Fcase=13609296636737320599 n16:scholar_case%3Fcase=16918510101497672858 n16:scholar_case%3Fcase=17003587970529480018 n16:scholar_case%3Fcase=6028613023966454848 n20:usrep392364.pdf n22: n14:case.html n23: n11:mancusi-v n17:opinion n21:844 n17:argument
owl:sameAs
n15:4rNxG wikidata:Q6747676 yago-res:Mancusi_v._DeForte freebase:m.0gky8t5
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Ussc dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Reflist dbt:Quote dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Clear dbt:Wikisource-inline dbt:Portal dbt:Short_description
dbp:dissent
White Black
dbp:docket
68
dbp:joindissent
Stewart
dbp:joinmajority
Warren, Douglas, Brennan, Fortas, Marshall
dbp:lawsapplied
dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:opinionannouncement
n17:opinion
dbp:oralargument
n17:argument
dbp:oyez
n21:844
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
17280.0
dbp:uspage
364
dbp:usvol
392
dbp:arguedate
0001-04-25
dbp:argueyear
1968
dbp:case
Mancusi v. DeForte,
dbp:decidedate
0001-06-17
dbp:decideyear
1968
dbp:findlaw
n9:364.html
dbp:fullname
United States ex rel. Frank DeForte, appellant v. Vincent R. Mancusi, Warden of Attica Prison, Attica, New York, appellee
dbp:holding
Documents obtained by prosecutor personally executing subpoena duces tecum from desk of union official were unconstitutionally admitted as evidence in later trial that convicted official of rackeetering-related charges; reasonable expectation of privacy under Fourth Amendment can exist in workplace without possessory interest in same. Second Circuit affirmed.
dbp:justia
n14:case.html
dbp:litigants
Mancusi v. DeForte
dbp:majority
Harlan
dbp:loc
n20:usrep392364.pdf
dbo:abstract
Mancusi v. DeForte, 392 U.S. 364 (1968), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court on privacy and the Fourth Amendment. It originated in the lower courts as United States ex rel. Frank DeForte, appellant v. Vincent R. Mancusi, Warden of Attica Prison, Attica, New York, appellee, a petition for a writ of habeas corpus by a prisoner who had exhausted all his state appeals. By a 6–3 margin the Court affirmed the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit's reversal of a district court denial of the petition. The prisoner, Frank DeForte, was one of several labor union officials on Long Island who had been convicted of racketeering-related charges connected to a scheme in which they attempted to monopolize the jukebox market in the New York Metropolitan area. Early in the investigation, local prosecutors had issued a subpoena duces tecum for records from the union officials. When they refused to comply, the prosecutors went to the union offices themselves and seized the records from the officials' desks themselves. DeForte had been present and voiced his objections. The state later admitted the action was illegal but the documents, which formed the bulk of the case against the officials, were not suppressed at trial. Both the state's appellate court and the New York State Court of Appeals sustained the verdict, and all the defendants went to prison. There they began filing habeas petitions to the federal courts. The first, alleging that the court's orders to the jury to continue deliberating after they had done so for almost 24 hours and twice asked for a break constituted coercion, was denied. DeForte's second, arguing as he had at trial and on his state appeal, that the search of his desk violated his reasonable expectation of privacy and thus his Fourth Amendment rights, was the one the Supreme Court heard. Justice John Marshall Harlan II wrote for the majority that under the Court's recent holding in Katz v. United States, DeForte had a reasonable expectation of privacy over the papers he kept at work even though they were not his personal property and he shared the office with his co-defendants. Nor did the subpoena authorize the prosecutor to act as he might with a search warrant, since the subpoena was not subject to independent judicial review before its execution. In dissent, Hugo Black, who had also dissented in Katz, said he could not find why the Court chose to depart from previous holdings that documents in the possession of one's employer enjoyed no Fourth Amendment protection, and was misreading the cases it relied on. The case is seen as a seminal case in privacy law, since it extended it for the first time to a non-residential space. Lower courts have used it to guide them in distinguishing Fourth Amendment claims into the present day. The Supreme Court has, in later holdings, extended it to include public employees during administrative investigations and considered its application in the context of modern telecommunications.
dbp:googlescholar
n16:scholar_case%3Fcase=13609296636737320599
dbp:openjurist
n11:mancusi-v
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Mancusi_v._DeForte?oldid=1056719337&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
79502
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Mancusi_v._DeForte