This HTML5 document contains 110 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n25http://dbpedia.org/resource/Wikt:
n23https://www.oyez.org/cases/1964/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n16https://scholar.google.com/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n26https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
umbel-rchttp://umbel.org/umbel/rc/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
n22http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep379/usrep379184/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n9https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/379/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n21https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/106945/mclaughlin-v-florida/
dbpedia-simplehttp://simple.dbpedia.org/resource/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
n18https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/379/184/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:McLaughlin_v._Florida
rdf:type
yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:Case yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 umbel-rc:Event dbo:UnitOfWork dbo:LegalCase yago:Happening107283608 yago:Abstraction100002137 owl:Thing dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases
rdfs:label
McLaughlin v. Florida
rdfs:comment
McLaughlin v. Florida, 379 U.S. 184 (1964), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously that a cohabitation law of Florida, part of the state's anti-miscegenation laws, was unconstitutional. The law prohibited habitual cohabitation by two unmarried people of opposite sex, if one was black and the other was white. The decision overturned Pace v. Alabama (1883), which had declared such statutes constitutional. It did not overturn the related Florida statute that prohibited interracial marriage between whites and blacks. Such laws were declared unconstitutional in 1967 in Loving v. Virginia.
foaf:name
McLaughlin, et al. v. Florida
dcterms:subject
dbc:Civil_rights_movement_case_law dbc:Legal_history_of_Florida dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court dbc:1964_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Interracial_relationships dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:African-American_history_of_Florida dbc:United_States_equal_protection_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_decisions_that_overrule_a_prior_Supreme_Court_decision
dbo:wikiPageID
2156805
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1075119191
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Miscegenation dbr:Fornication dbr:Loving_v._Virginia dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Perez_v._Sharp dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Adultery dbr:Byron_White dbr:Florida dbc:Legal_history_of_Florida dbr:William_O._Douglas dbr:Pace_v._Alabama dbc:1964_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_of_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Potter_Stewart dbc:Interracial_relationships dbr:Anti-miscegenation_laws dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_379 dbr:American_South dbr:Free_speech dbr:Interracial_marriage dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_decisions_that_overrule_a_prior_Supreme_Court_decision dbr:Miami_Beach dbc:Civil_rights_movement_case_law dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbc:African-American_history_of_Florida dbr:John_Marshall_Harlan_II n25:per_se dbc:United_States_equal_protection_case_law
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n9:184.html n16:scholar_case%3Fcase=17718017251310240391 n18:case.html n21: n22:usrep379184.pdf n23:11
owl:sameAs
yago-res:McLaughlin_v._Florida dbpedia-simple:McLaughlin_v._Florida wikidata:Q6802112 freebase:m.06r0hv n26:4rzFE
dbp:subsequent
Convictions set aside
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Citation_needed dbt:Wikisource dbt:Ussc dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Quote dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:US14thAmendment
dbp:joinmajority
Warren, Black, Clark, Brennan, Goldberg
dbp:lawsapplied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV; Fla. Stat. ยง 798.05
dbp:oyez
n23:11
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
Defendants convicted, Fl Sup Ct affirmed. Appeal from the Supreme Court of Florida
dbp:uspage
184
dbp:usvol
379
dbp:argueyear
1964
dbp:case
McLaughlin v. Florida,
dbp:courtlistener
n21:
dbp:decidedate
0001-12-07
dbp:decideyear
1964
dbp:findlaw
n9:184.html
dbp:fullname
McLaughlin, et al. v. Florida
dbp:holding
Florida statute prohibits an unmarried interracial couple from habitually living in and occupying the same room in the nighttime. The same conduct when engaged in by members of the same race, is not prohibited. This is in violation of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the 14th Amendment and is, therefore, unconstitutional.
dbp:justia
n18:case.html
dbp:litigants
McLaughlin v. Florida
dbp:majority
White
dbp:loc
n22:usrep379184.pdf
dbo:abstract
McLaughlin v. Florida, 379 U.S. 184 (1964), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously that a cohabitation law of Florida, part of the state's anti-miscegenation laws, was unconstitutional. The law prohibited habitual cohabitation by two unmarried people of opposite sex, if one was black and the other was white. The decision overturned Pace v. Alabama (1883), which had declared such statutes constitutional. It did not overturn the related Florida statute that prohibited interracial marriage between whites and blacks. Such laws were declared unconstitutional in 1967 in Loving v. Virginia.
dbp:arguedatea
0001-10-13
dbp:arguedateb
14
dbp:concurrence
Stewart Harlan
dbp:googlescholar
n16:scholar_case%3Fcase=17718017251310240391
dbp:joinconcurrence
Douglas
dbp:overturnedPreviousCase
Pace v. Alabama
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:McLaughlin_v._Florida?oldid=1075119191&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
7679
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:McLaughlin_v._Florida