This HTML5 document contains 57 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n8https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
n14http://internetisapropernoun.net/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Open_discourse
rdfs:label
Open discourse
rdfs:comment
Open Discourse is a technical term used in discourse analysis and Sociolinguistics and is commonly contrasted with Closed Discourse. The concept of open and closed discourse is associated with the overlay of open and closed discourse communities and open and closed communication events. Keys to determining whether a discourse is open or closed include access to information, equity of access, open access, quality of discourse and mechanisms and modalities of discourse control: overt, covert, implicit and incidental. As a conceptual filter and cultural construct, ideology is a function and mechanism of discourse control. Channel and signal of a communication event and register of communication together control discourse and therefore, determine the degree of social inclusion and social exclu
dcterms:subject
dbc:Sociolinguistics dbc:Applied_linguistics dbc:Discourse_analysis
dbo:wikiPageID
26922673
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
941178695
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Register_(sociolinguistics) dbr:Sociolinguistics dbr:Social_media dbr:Discourse_analysis dbr:Teun_A._van_Dijk dbr:Discourse_community dbc:Applied_linguistics dbr:Complex_adaptive_system dbr:Blog dbc:Sociolinguistics dbr:Internet dbr:Discourse dbr:Equity_theory dbr:Social_exclusion dbr:Information_access dbr:Semiotics dbr:Signal_(electronics) dbr:Pedagogical dbr:Cultural_artifact dbr:Ideology dbr:Urban_development dbr:Dialogical_analysis dbr:Communication_noise dbr:Stylistics_(linguistics) dbr:Rhetoric dbr:Case_studies dbr:Technical_terminology dbr:Channel_(communications) dbr:Living_document dbr:Open_access_(publishing) dbr:Social_inclusion dbr:Stakeholder_engagement dbr:Analysis_of_subjective_logics dbc:Discourse_analysis dbr:Pragmatics dbr:Critical_Discourse_Analysis dbr:Continuum_(theory) dbr:Public_participation dbr:Urban_planning dbr:Emergent_properties
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n14:
owl:sameAs
n8:4sV6F freebase:m.0bmfr1l wikidata:Q7096357
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Confusing
dbo:abstract
Open Discourse is a technical term used in discourse analysis and Sociolinguistics and is commonly contrasted with Closed Discourse. The concept of open and closed discourse is associated with the overlay of open and closed discourse communities and open and closed communication events. Keys to determining whether a discourse is open or closed include access to information, equity of access, open access, quality of discourse and mechanisms and modalities of discourse control: overt, covert, implicit and incidental. As a conceptual filter and cultural construct, ideology is a function and mechanism of discourse control. Channel and signal of a communication event and register of communication together control discourse and therefore, determine the degree of social inclusion and social exclusion and, by extension, the relative efficiency of that communication event. Open and closed discourse operate along a continuum where absolute closure and complete openness are theoretically untenable due to noise in the channel. The nature of the channel, signal, code, replicability, recording, transmissibility, cataloguing, recall or other variable of a communication event and its information control and context of transmission-as-event, impact its relative position along the continuum between open and closed discourse. In all cases, open discourse is assumed to be sustained discourse. Van Dijk (c.2003: p. 357) holds that: "Although most discourse control is contextual or global, even local details of meaning, form, or style may be controlled, e.g. the details of an answer in class or court, or choice of lexical items or jargon in courtrooms, classrooms or newsrooms (Martin Rojo 1994).
gold:hypernym
dbr:Term
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Open_discourse?oldid=941178695&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
8678
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Open_discourse