This HTML5 document contains 64 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
n9http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n4https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n8http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Political_polarization_in_Turkey
rdfs:label
Political polarization in Turkey
rdfs:comment
Political polarization is the bimodal distribution, meaning that two obvious peaks of opinion in the political sense. It can be observed through people's choices, sociopolitical approaches, and even where they live. In the last years, political polarization has caused many political results in the governments and the law-making organs. However it may not be classified as a "negative" aspect, and it can be used by politicians to examine the social and economic parts to develop in a country. Citizens would be more prone to do skeptical analysis on the subjects, and gain more meaning in their lives. Mexico, Turkey, India, South Africa, Brazil and Venezuela are amongst the countries that have the highest polarization.
foaf:depiction
n8:Demokrat_Parti_(1946)_logo.svg n8:Gezi_Park_protests.jpg n8:Bimodal.png
dcterms:subject
dbc:Politics_of_Turkey
dbo:wikiPageID
65090633
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1123970810
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:WhatsApp dbr:Umbrella_Movement dbr:Coalition_governments_in_Turkey dbr:Snapchat dbr:Non-governmental_organization dbr:Bimodal_polarity dbr:Republican_People's_Party dbr:Sociopolitical dbr:Vote_and_Beyond dbr:Istanbul dbr:Ekşi_Sözlük dbr:Instagram dbr:Citizen_journalism n9:Gezi_Park_protests.jpg dbr:Press_Freedom_Index dbr:Grand_National_Assembly_of_Turkey dbr:Democrat_Party_(Turkey,_1946–1961) dbr:Facebook n9:Bimodal.png dbr:Reporters_Without_Borders dbr:Justice_and_Development_Party_(Turkey) dbr:Nationalist_Movement_Party n9:Demokrat_Parti_(1946)_logo.svg dbr:Ethnicity dbr:Second_Constitutional_Era dbr:CNN_Türk dbr:Twitter dbr:COVID-19_pandemic dbr:1971_Turkish_military_memorandum dbr:Gezi_Park_protests dbr:Periscope_(app) dbr:Good_Party dbr:BBC_World_Service dbr:1970_in_Turkey dbr:Sözcü dbr:Secularism_in_Turkey dbr:Deutsche_Welle dbr:Recep_Tayyip_Erdoğan dbc:Politics_of_Turkey dbr:Comparative_Study_of_Electoral_Systems dbr:BirGün dbr:Peoples'_Democratic_Party_(Turkey) dbr:Sunni_Islam dbr:140journos dbr:World_Values_Survey dbr:1990_in_Turkey dbr:Felicity_Party
owl:sameAs
n4:FPTiD wikidata:Q104852943
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Reflist
dbo:thumbnail
n8:Bimodal.png?width=300
dbo:abstract
Political polarization is the bimodal distribution, meaning that two obvious peaks of opinion in the political sense. It can be observed through people's choices, sociopolitical approaches, and even where they live. In the last years, political polarization has caused many political results in the governments and the law-making organs. However it may not be classified as a "negative" aspect, and it can be used by politicians to examine the social and economic parts to develop in a country. Citizens would be more prone to do skeptical analysis on the subjects, and gain more meaning in their lives. Mexico, Turkey, India, South Africa, Brazil and Venezuela are amongst the countries that have the highest polarization.
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Political_polarization_in_Turkey?oldid=1123970810&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
18036
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Political_polarization_in_Turkey